We're excited to present a great new set of boards to classic movie fans with tons of new features, stability, and performance.

If you’re new to the message boards, please “Register” to get started. If you want to learn more about the new boards, visit our FAQ.

Register

If you're a returning member, start by resetting your password to claim your old display name using your email address.

Re-Register

Thanks for your continued support of the TCM Message Boards.

X

Kyle Kersten was a true friend of TCM. One of the first and most active participants of the Message Boards, “Kyle in Hollywood” (aka, hlywdkjk) demonstrated a depth of knowledge and largesse of spirit that made him one of the most popular and respected voices in these forums. This thread is a living memorial to his life and love of movies, which remain with us still.

X

Jump to content


Photo

Future of Democratic Party?

What do Democrats need to do.

  • Please log in to reply
589 replies to this topic

#521 Hibi

Hibi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,393 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 22 November 2016 - 01:01 PM

She may have been a poor candidate with a lot of baggage but she would have eked out a win if not for Comey.  Trump was in self-destruct mode until that gave him oxygen.  Clinton did not lose by much.  She was 20 points ahead before Comey - not 3 or 4.  I think a lot of people said 'the hell with it' and came in for Trump at the last minute because of all the Clinton negativity and Trump's reinvigorated campaign in the last week.

 

Agree. By the time the FBI said they didnt find anything it was too late. And probably a lot of people thought it was another cover up....



#522 Bogie56

Bogie56

    Prof. Knucklehead

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11,063 posts
  • LocationTralfamadore

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:58 PM

Still though, she probably would have lost.  She was way ahead up until the votes were actually counted.  There were a lot of people out there who were for Trump who never got included in polling, historic or other data.

Clinton was a poor candidate who ran a poor campaign.  Any other Democrat (except Sanders) probably would have won.

 

She may have been a poor candidate with a lot of baggage but she would have eked out a win if not for Comey.  Trump was in self-destruct mode until that gave him oxygen.  Clinton did not lose by much.  She was 20 points ahead before Comey - not 3 or 4.  I think a lot of people said 'the hell with it' and came in for Trump at the last minute because of all the Clinton negativity and Trump's reinvigorated campaign in the last week.



#523 Hibi

Hibi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,393 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:54 PM

the-fbi-reopened-my-investigation-what-y

 

 

And funny there was nothing there.........



#524 Hibi

Hibi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,393 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:53 PM

Still though, she probably would have lost.  She was way ahead up until the votes were actually counted.  There were a lot of people out there who were for Trump who never got included in polling, historic or other data.

Clinton was a poor candidate who ran a poor campaign.  Any other Democrat (except Sanders) probably would have won.

 

 

We'll never really know. I dont think she ran a poor campaign. She just kept getting derailed.  D-MP got all the coverage



#525 TheCid

TheCid

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,723 posts
  • LocationSouth Carolina

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:48 PM

Yep, Hillary was way ahead until Comey decided to stick his neck in.........

Still though, she probably would have lost.  She was way ahead up until the votes were actually counted.  There were a lot of people out there who were for Trump who never got included in polling, historic or other data.

Clinton was a poor candidate who ran a poor campaign.  Any other Democrat (except Sanders) probably would have won.


  • jamesjazzguitar likes this

#526 HIGHWAY

HIGHWAY

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,429 posts

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:44 PM

Yep, Hillary was way ahead until Comey decided to stick his neck in.........

the-fbi-reopened-my-investigation-what-y



#527 jamesjazzguitar

jamesjazzguitar

    There is nothing as bad as something not so bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 18,235 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:27 PM

Reasonable people voted for Clinton.  Obama's hope and change was more believable than: I have a plan and Only I can fix it.

Perhaps if Obama and the Dems had not gotten into the ACA right off the bat and worked on some of the other changes, they would not have lost control in 2010.  After 2010, hope and change was dead.

 

Regardless, as you showed in your breakdown of who controls what, the future is bleak for the Dems.  It will get worse with new Congress and Supreme Court and Trump's cabinet supporting voter suppression by states.

 

Best hope for Dems is that Trump and his appointees will screw things up so badly, the core base will just not vote (as many did before Trump).  AND the Dems will get organized, return to the more moderate, left of center position and reach out to the groups they left behind.

 

While from a political POV related to the Dems you and I agree with  'Best hope for Dems is that Trump and his appointees will screw things up so badly";   I assume as Americans we really don't wish for things to get really bad just so the Dems can regain political power.

 

From day one of Obama taking office the GOP made it their mission to try to ensure things went badly just to ensure Obama was a one term President.     These clowns even had the gall to call themselves the true Americans.

 

I want the Dems to take a different course and for the nation to advance and avoid disasters, and in doing so the Dems are rewarded in 2018 and 2020.   But of course that would take an informed electorate.


  • TheCid likes this

#528 Hibi

Hibi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,393 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 22 November 2016 - 11:40 AM

They said the Republicans would never get back in due to shifting demographics.  It will all boil down to having a dynamic candidate that is not encumbered with a ton of baggage.  It was ridiculous to end up losing to that clown, Trump.  It shouldn't have even been close.  That allowed Comey to hand the election to that buffoon.

 

 

Yep, Hillary was way ahead until Comey decided to stick his neck in.........



#529 Hibi

Hibi

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,393 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 22 November 2016 - 11:39 AM

Reasonable people voted for Clinton.  Obama's hope and change was more believable than: I have a plan and Only I can fix it.

Perhaps if Obama and the Dems had not gotten into the ACA right off the bat and worked on some of the other changes, they would not have lost control in 2010.  After 2010, hope and change was dead.

 

Regardless, as you showed in your breakdown of who controls what, the future is bleak for the Dems.  It will get worse with new Congress and Supreme Court and Trump's cabinet supporting voter suppression by states.

 

Best hope for Dems is that Trump and his appointees will screw things up so badly, the core base will just not vote (as many did before Trump).  AND the Dems will get organized, return to the more moderate, left of center position and reach out to the groups they left behind.

 

 

It wont take long for D-MP to screw things up so badly. BELIEVE ME!!! He'll be so unpopular by the end of his first year (if he makes it) he'll have to hide out in D-MP tower........



#530 Bogie56

Bogie56

    Prof. Knucklehead

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11,063 posts
  • LocationTralfamadore

Posted 22 November 2016 - 11:31 AM

Reasonable people voted for Clinton.  Obama's hope and change was more believable than: I have a plan and Only I can fix it.

Perhaps if Obama and the Dems had not gotten into the ACA right off the bat and worked on some of the other changes, they would not have lost control in 2010.  After 2010, hope and change was dead.

 

Regardless, as you showed in your breakdown of who controls what, the future is bleak for the Dems.  It will get worse with new Congress and Supreme Court and Trump's cabinet supporting voter suppression by states.

 

Best hope for Dems is that Trump and his appointees will screw things up so badly, the core base will just not vote (as many did before Trump).  AND the Dems will get organized, return to the more moderate, left of center position and reach out to the groups they left behind.

 

They said the Republicans would never get back in due to shifting demographics.  It will all boil down to having a dynamic candidate that is not encumbered with a ton of baggage.  It was ridiculous to end up losing to that clown, Trump.  It shouldn't have even been close.  That allowed Comey to hand the election to that buffoon.



#531 MovieMadness

MovieMadness

    Bogie Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,746 posts
  • LocationHigh Sierra

Posted 22 November 2016 - 10:11 AM

Yes, the clueless ones were the winners. Keep believing that, and see how far it goes. Meanwhile since the election the Democrats have only gone farther left, doing exactly what everyone expected.


Things are never so bad they can't be made worse.


#532 TheCid

TheCid

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,723 posts
  • LocationSouth Carolina

Posted 22 November 2016 - 09:20 AM

Just like with Obama and his hope and change rhetoric reasonable people don't believe campaign pandering. 

Reasonable people voted for Clinton.  Obama's hope and change was more believable than: I have a plan and Only I can fix it.

Perhaps if Obama and the Dems had not gotten into the ACA right off the bat and worked on some of the other changes, they would not have lost control in 2010.  After 2010, hope and change was dead.

 

Regardless, as you showed in your breakdown of who controls what, the future is bleak for the Dems.  It will get worse with new Congress and Supreme Court and Trump's cabinet supporting voter suppression by states.

 

Best hope for Dems is that Trump and his appointees will screw things up so badly, the core base will just not vote (as many did before Trump).  AND the Dems will get organized, return to the more moderate, left of center position and reach out to the groups they left behind.



#533 Vautrin

Vautrin

    Quel siecle a mains!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,401 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 21 November 2016 - 11:21 PM

I would but it differently;  The Dems will be in fairly good shape IF Trump screws things up OR if certain negative events happen under his so called watch (regardless if they are due to decisions he or his admin have made). 

Sure, if things go really bad under Trump

then they will be in an excellent position.


Curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid get.


#534 Vautrin

Vautrin

    Quel siecle a mains!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,401 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 21 November 2016 - 11:19 PM

Typical wingnut cluelessness.


  • TheCid likes this

Curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid get.


#535 MovieMadness

MovieMadness

    Bogie Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,746 posts
  • LocationHigh Sierra

Posted 21 November 2016 - 08:11 PM

1.4 million more in the popular vote last I heard.......

 

If we throw out all the dead people who voted, Trump has the lead again.


Things are never so bad they can't be made worse.


#536 jamesjazzguitar

jamesjazzguitar

    There is nothing as bad as something not so bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 18,235 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 21 November 2016 - 07:29 PM

Well, only HE can fix things.  We know this because HE told us so.

 

Just like with Obama and his hope and change rhetoric reasonable people don't believe campaign pandering. 



#537 Bogie56

Bogie56

    Prof. Knucklehead

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11,063 posts
  • LocationTralfamadore

Posted 21 November 2016 - 07:27 PM

I would but it differently;  The Dems will be in fairly good shape IF Trump screws things up OR if certain negative events happen under his so called watch (regardless if they are due to decisions he or his admin have made). 

 

Well, only HE can fix things.  We know this because HE told us so.



#538 jamesjazzguitar

jamesjazzguitar

    There is nothing as bad as something not so bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 18,235 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 21 November 2016 - 07:26 PM

They do have some work to do and will have to tough it out for

a few years in D.C., but they're in fairly good shape for the future,

especially is Trump screws things up. GOTV in off years is still

a big problem for Dems. We might have a Dem governor in NC,

if the vote counting ever ends.

 

I would but it differently;  The Dems will be in fairly good shape IF Trump screws things up OR if certain negative events happen under his so called watch (regardless if they are due to decisions he or his admin have made). 



#539 Vautrin

Vautrin

    Quel siecle a mains!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,401 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 21 November 2016 - 06:04 PM

As for the Dem party position;  it all depends on how one measures this.     Yes, if based on popular vote for President,  the Dems are ahead,  but if measured by the US Congress the Dems don't have a majority in the House or Senate.

 

At the state level things the Dems are very weak: 

 

Governor breakdown is:  Democratic (18) Republican (31) Independent (1).

 

The GOP now controls 68 out of 98 partisan state legislative chambers -- the highest number in the history of the party.

They do have some work to do and will have to tough it out for

a few years in D.C., but they're in fairly good shape for the future,

especially is Trump screws things up. GOTV in off years is still

a big problem for Dems. We might have a Dem governor in NC,

if the vote counting ever ends.


Curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid get.


#540 mr6666

mr6666

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19,364 posts

Posted 21 November 2016 - 05:15 PM

Trump Infrastructure Plan a 'Trap' Democrats Should Reject, Experts Warn-

 

"...Trump's plan is not really an infrastructure plan. It's a tax-cut plan for utility-industry and construction-sector investors, and a massive corporate welfare plan for contractors. The Trump plan doesn't directly fund new roads, bridges, water systems or airports, as did Hillary Clinton's 2016 infrastructure proposal. Instead, Trump's plan provides tax breaks to private-sector investors who back profitable construction projects....

 

"Progressives should not associate themselves with this exercise in crony capitalism."

 

http://www.commondre...ct-experts-warn

 

Said Bernie Sanders:

“Trump would allow corporations that have stashed their profits overseas to pay just a fraction of what the companies owe in federal taxes. And then he would allow the companies to “invest” in infrastructure projects in exchange for even more tax breaks. Trump’s plan is corporate welfare coming and going.”


  • darkblue, BelleLeGrand1, TheCid and 1 other like this

"A small elephant is not a rabbit."





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users