• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About LatriceRoyale

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. LatriceRoyale

    Intriguing Low Life Characters

    I have been waiting a long time to see The Servant! In keeping with dastardly and vile: Cockney villain Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast (2000).
  2. LatriceRoyale

    Lack of Diversity in *Women's Roles*?

    I agree with you Larry, further to your two choices, I will add Ethel Barrymore and Marie Dressler. All of these actresses are diverse and leave a lasting impression for me.
  3. LatriceRoyale

    my new laptop

    Happy 60th Birthday Nippy!
  4. LatriceRoyale

    For Gastronauts Only!

    Post apocalyptic butcher serving up gourmet meals...not quite Cafe Anglais from Babette’s Feast...
  5. LatriceRoyale

    For Gastronauts Only!

    Babette’s Feast Incidentally: Stéphane Audran, died 27 March 2018, she played Babette, the Parisian refugee and ‘cook’ to the Sisters. Such a glorious and memorable feast on film!
  6. You are absolutely out of line slaytonf. The importance that I place on a topic is factual and accurate information. It is beyond me how you arrive at your conclusion that posters are defending “a child r-apist”, other than to conclude that you do not like an adversarial position, particularly when you are wrong. I do find your statement somewhat ironic in that I worked in Law before retirement but not once in the defence of paedophile.
  7. The Hollywood Reporter interviewed Polanski: ”Most of the facts of the case are undisputed. On March 11, 1977, Polanski, at the time the toast of Hollywood as the director of Rosemary's Baby and Chinatown, was arrested and charged with drugging and **** then-13-year-old Samantha Gailey (now Samantha Geimer). As part of a plea bargain, Polanski pled guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, underwent psychiatric evaluation and spent 42 days in jail. But in 1978, when he heard that a judge was going to disregard the plea bargain and make an example of him, reportedly by giving him up to 50 years in prison, Polanski fled to Paris. He has remained a fugitive ever since, despite repeated attempts, including several pleas by the victim, to have the case dismissed. Last month, California judge Scott Gordon rejected Geimer's latest request, saying the Polanski case would go forward.” (
  8. LatriceRoyale

    Green Berets on Veterans Day

    * “MEET RETIRED U.S. ARMY SERGEANT ERIC HUNTER, WHO SERVED AND SACRIFICED IN BOTH IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. MR. HUNTER SELECTED: THE GREEN BERETS ('68)” Mr. Hunter was severely injured in combat and his dream of becoming a Green Beret was taken away from him. I had no problem watching The Green Berets with John Wayne.
  9. DB, most definitely like the American Conservatives. Calgary PD are ridiculous. Conservative Albertans think that Any music beyond Garth Brooks or the Mormon Tabernacle Choir is considered the work of the devil.
  10. Johnny Depp recently visited the BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada and put smiles on many children, staff, parents and me! Any Star that takes time to make the day of Sick Children is A good guy in my book.
  11. I am really irritated by that Ben, Get a free T-Shirt pop-up! The pop up is relentless on my IPad.
  12. LatriceRoyale

    Who Said It?

  13. LatriceRoyale


    It is obvious that you and DB have an ongoing grudge. Don't assume that people 'side' with anybody on these boards, just because that appears to be your constitution, it is not mine. I am quite certain that if we were discussing topics face-to-face, there would not be the vitriolic behaviour and childishness that goes on here when discussions are adverse in nature. I am retired now but worked in one of the most highly charged and adverse areas that I can think of, that being Law. We had a lot of diverse opinions and had to conduct ourselves with a very regimented code of conduct 'My Friend'. If you wish to discuss this further, PM me. Otherwise, just stop with the insults and conjectures that have no evidence.
  14. LatriceRoyale


    I'd like to know too, so I can block the Cry baby! Just let the moderators do their jobs in applying the terms and conditions of the policy/code of conduct without somebody fettering their discretionary authority.
  15. LatriceRoyale


    “Islamophobia” is not a constructive term—and words do matter. My intention is not to offend or inspire hatred in any form, but to promote honest conversation. In that spirit, I will outline the two major reasons that we should stop saying “Islamophobia.” For starters, this idea silences honest criticism of Islam, which is something both necessary and warranted. Let me be clear on this point: We should be criticizing the religion of Islam and its doctrines. We should absolutely not be criticizing all Muslim people. There is a massive difference and I am arguing in favor of the former and against the latter. First, the doctrines of Islam are in fact worthy of high criticism. This is a religion whose holy book calls for the death of unbelievers, and for apostates to be slain. This same holy book grants men complete control over women, and openly permits and encourages brutal violence against women. This is a religion whose prophet ordered a woman to be stoned to death for adultery, and that anyone participating in homosexual activity is murdered. This is a religion that encourages torture, and that commands its adherents to fight blindly in the name of its God, even against their better judgment. What’s more, there is an entire system of religious law, called Sharia, based solely on the Quran and the words of Muhammed, which happen to be the source of the atrocities I’ve just mentioned. And while it is easy to say that only “a few bad apples” believe in these things, that is simply not true. In a study conducted by Pew Research Center, for example, 99 percent of Muslims surveyed in Afghanistan supported Sharia being imposed as the official law of the land. While the numbers certainly differ by country, and there is variance even within Sharia supporters, the results are far from encouraging. When one makes a truthful criticism of Islam and then is immediately silenced or condemned as an “Islamophobe,” it also silences the people who desperately need and want for that criticism to be heard, but can’t voice it themselves. With the privilege we have been granted, we can give a voice to those who most need one, and by using false claims of ignorance or bigotry to silence those trying to do just that, you are a contributor to the problem. Also, the term “phobia” is unclear. By definition, a “phobia” is an extreme or irrational fear. While I do not believe fear is at all the best way to address this problem and actively advocate against fear, it is not inherently irrational to fear a doctrine or a set of ideas that calls for your death, or that endorses violence against women or that covets world domination. Why is it there is no Christianity-ophobia, or Mormon-ophobia or Scientology-ophobia? Because an author can write a book critical of Christianity and not have to go into hiding for years because of a Fatwah calling for their death. Salman Rushdie cannot say the same for Islam. Because a cartoonist can publish a picture ridiculing Scientology, and not be killed for it. Stéphane Charbonnier cannot say the same for Islam. No one should be killed for publishing a cartoon, or writing a book or leaving a religion, period. There should be no debate on this, no matter the circumstances, and it is not irrational to fear a doctrine that says otherwise. Anti-Muslim bigotry is no doubt a problem and I do not want that to be lost in my criticisms. It needs to be fought whenever it rears its ugly head, but let’s call it what it is: anti-Muslim bigotry. I am opposed to a “Muslim Ban” like the one our president and much of our country had called for. We cannot turn our backs on refugees that have found themselves in the worst of imaginable situations, yet we must keep an even head and think straight when discussing this issue. Women’s rights, free speech, LGBT rights and religious freedom are all liberal values and values that represent everything great about the world, yet when someone truthfully criticizes the institution most threatening to those values, liberals often shout them down as “Islamophobic.” It is time for that to stop. Islam as it currently stands is not a set of ideas that aligns itself with liberal values and actually stands at the antithesis of many of those values and that is simply a fact. That said, there are many liberal Muslims and Muslims who want to reform their religion for the better, and they are the ones who are really going to be able to do it. These are the people we should not only allow into this country, but encourage them to come and give them all of the possible support we can—and that starts with the truth. Please, I implore you, stop silencing the truth and consider the consequences of doing so. Because for every night you lay in bed, satisfied with yourself for sniffing out another “Islamophobe,” a young girl in Afghanistan or Iraq or Pakistan lies voiceless in her bed, steeped in the dread of what tomorrow will bring. K. Driessen

New Members:

Register Here

Learn more about the new message boards:


Having problems?

Contact Us