In response to jamesjazzguitar:
As for Louise Tracy, ask yourself why knowing, as she must have, that he was rampantly unfaithful to her and that he wasn't living with her for years, why did she not divorce him? The answer isn't because of their son or the Clinic. She would have got most of Tracy's assets in a divorce. She wasn't going to lose out financially and there was certainly no religious prohibition from her end. So what was Louise thinking?
You know that is a very good point. Ive read several books about both Hepburn and Tracy and all of them seem content to settle for the Catholic/Clinic explanation. The only thing I think of is that either she was reflecting the attitudes of her time (That men were bound to stray and women just had to put up with it--see
The Women, The Philadelphia Story , etc) or she was stopped from doing so by MGM, which had a lot of power in LA at the time. They wouldn't have wanted their "wholesome" Father Falnnagan involved in a messy divorce, especially if the infidelities and drinking came out. It could also be that she was too proud (or possibly in serious denial) While it was humiliating enough to have her husband cheating on her, it would have been far worse to have it become public knowledge beyond Hollywood. As long as it wasn't being splashed all over the tabloids (which came in in the late 40's and early 50's I believe) she could say it wasn't true, it was just rumors.