Princess of Tap

What Are They Saying about trump? " He's a******* Moron! "

990 posts in this topic

2) "If Donald Trump becomes the next President of the U.S. it would be a complete disaster.... I think he's acting like another Hitler by inciting racism."

 

Eva Schloss, the Stepsister of Holocaust Victim, Anne Frank

 

Newsweek, 1/16

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3) " Trump is a potential disaster as commander-in-chief-- uninformed, volatile, poor judgment. Hard to believe this is the candidate of a major party."

 

Barry McCaffrey, retired four-star U.S. Army General

 

Time, 6/15/16

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4) " A true friend of the state of Israel, believes in Trump's ability to lead.
 
Netanyahu,Israeli prime minister
 
 
By POLITICO STAFF 

 

11/09/16 06:40 AM EST

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

4) " A true friend of the state of Israel, believes in Trump's ability to lead.
 
Netanyahu,Israeli prime minister
 
 
By POLITICO STAFF 

 

11/09/16 06:40 AM EST

 

 

Hopefully Trump keeps his promises of America first.     Netanyahu uses America to push his political agenda.   We don't need those type of friends.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully Trump keeps his promises of America first.     Netanyahu uses America to push his political agenda.   We don't need those type of friends.

Well at least Israel is not on the USA list of countries that are targeted for regime change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully Trump keeps his promises of America first.     Netanyahu uses America to push his political agenda.   We don't need those type of friends.

:D

2wqttgm.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to remind everybody, one more time, that this thread is just for the written word please.

 

Let's prove that we all are not robots,and that we all know how to write--

 

no links please, no videos please, no photos please.

 

Merci Bien!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to remind everybody, one more time, that this thread is just for the written word please.

 

Let's prove that we all are not robots,and that we all know how to write--

 

no links please, no videos please, no photos please.

 

Merci Bien!

 

So it's for fake news only, got it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's entirely up to you.

well, why are you banning images, links and videos?

 

it's a very long wait for a jpeg to up at tinypic dot com

 

I doan have to do it but I'm a considerate poster. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, why are you banning images, links and videos?

 

it's a very long wait for a jpeg to up at tinypic dot com

 

I doan have to do it but I'm a considerate poster. :D

This Thread is about what individuals have said about Donald Trump.

They don't have to be famous or well-known, but it's probably more interesting if others are knowledgeable about their identity and background.

 

What I'm looking for are just quotes with attribution. You can look at my first three examples. I feel like when a person actually has to write what another person has said--they better understand what they are actually communicating.

 

Every thread doesn't have to be identical or conform to the average.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5) (Trump)" He's so blatantly stupid. He's a punk, he's a dog, he's a pig....

a mutt.... who doesn't do his homework, doesn't care. He's an idiot."

 

"Colin Powell said it best: He's a national disaster. He's an embarrassment to this country."

 

Robert DeNiro

 

The Independent(UK), 11/7/16

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6) "On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia. He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow."

 

 

seek modes of working together

 

Published on Oct 12, 2016, C-SPAN

Green party presidential candidate Jill Stein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7) " When you think how far we have come, and at what cost, and with what faith, to just turn it all over to this monstrous clown with a monstrous ego, with no experience, never served his country in any way-- it's just crazy."

 

 

David McCullough-- Pulitzer Prize-winning historian for two books on American presidents: Truman and John Adams.

 

 

New York Times, 7/12/16

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8) Shachnow said that Trump "has the temperament to commander-in-chief," while Williams called the Republican nominee "more trusted" than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.

 
By Major Gen. Sidney Shachnow, a 40-year Army veteran and Holocaust survivor, and Rear Admiral Charles Williams, ahead of a speech on veterans affairs in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
 
Israelnationalnews.com/Ben Ariel, 07/09/16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7) " When you think how far we have come, and at what cost, and with what faith, to just turn it all over to this monstrous clown with a monstrous ego, with no experience, never served his country in any way-- it's just crazy."

 

 

David McCullough-- Pulitzer Prize-winning historian for two books on American presidents: Truman and John Adams.

 

 

New York Times, 7/12/16

than the democrats shoulda thought long and hard before obligatorally nominating hillary clinton...

 

mistakes can yield severe consequences. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

than the democrats shoulda thought long and hard before obligatorally nominating hillary clinton...

 

mistakes can yield severe consequences. :lol:

 

There were many, many clues way prior to 2016,  starting with the Dem defeats in 2010 especially the major gains by the GOP at the state and local levels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just what exactly does this clown mccullough mean by handing over how far we've come to trump?

 

I assume he's alluding to social 'progress' like same-sex marriage and the like. America ain't just progressives alone but social conservatives as well.

 

the religious and the god-fearing. why should not that part of America consider the scotus' same-sex marriage ruling an attack upon judeo-christian morality and indeed, the civilized standards of western civilization itself?

 

for the traditional monogamous marriage union is one of the very underpinnings of western civilization and it's associated societies.

 

it's always that one way with liberals...

 

their way and bleep what everybody else believes! :angry:

 

that is not freedom and tolerance but a godless and soulless authoritarianism masquerading as human liberty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just what exactly does this clown mccullough mean by handing over how far we've come to trump?

 

I assume he's alluding to social 'progress' like same-sex marriage and the like. America ain't just progressives alone but social conservatives as well.

 

the religious and the god-fearing. why should not that part of America consider the scotus' same-sex marriage ruling an attack upon judeo-christian morality and indeed, the civilized standards of western civilization itself?

 

for the traditional monogamous marriage union is one of the very underpinnings of western civilization and it's associated societies.

 

it's always that one way with liberals...

 

their way and bleep what everybody else believes! :angry:

 

that is not freedom and tolerance but a godless and soulless authoritarianism masquerading as human liberty.

 

You couldn't be more wrong as it relates to SSM.    No liberal is forcing anyone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

Instead is it conservatives that wish to DENY the right for someone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

THAT is being a soulless authoritarian as well as denying liberty.   (BE HONEST,  you know I'm right here).

 

Why do you care WHO someone marries????   Why do YOU wish to control the lives of others?????

 

Really Nip,  I understand why you support conservatives on economic issues but I don't understand why you're so afraid of gay people.   Note that Trump favors SSM and said so after the election.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't be more wrong as it relates to SSM.    No liberal is forcing anyone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

Instead is it conservatives that wish to DENY the right for someone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

THAT is being a soulless authoritarian as well as denying liberty.   (BE HONEST,  you know I'm right here).

 

Why do you care WHO someone marries????   Why do YOU wish to control the lives of others?????

 

Really Nip,  I understand why you support conservatives on economic issues but I don't understand why you're so afraid of gay people.   Note that Trump favors SSM and said so after the election.   

I think there are people who see the changing of the definition of marriage in the law that the SC decided on as being a law that is wrong. I for one want everyone to have equality under the law.
 
 I do see that the decision the SC made was with a couple of hurdles and they both had to do with morality. The first hurdle was with God and the history of America and it's belief system. The second hurdle was with how nature gave witness to a form of acknowledgement that there would be a breach of the normal nature of life if the change was made to redefine marriage.
 
The SC decided to change the law but first the decision was made to ignore the obstacle of morality. I as an American can live with the law, but as a individual I can believe the law is wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't be more wrong as it relates to SSM.    No liberal is forcing anyone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

Instead is it conservatives that wish to DENY the right for someone to get married to someone of the same sex.

 

THAT is being a soulless authoritarian as well as denying liberty.   (BE HONEST,  you know I'm right here).

 

Why do you care WHO someone marries????   Why do YOU wish to control the lives of others?????

 

Really Nip,  I understand why you support conservatives on economic issues but I don't understand why you're so afraid of gay people.   Note that Trump favors SSM and said so after the election.   

two points....

 

religious-minded people IN NO WAY should be expected to accept edicts that run completely contrary to their perception of human interrelations.

 

suppose the scotus ruled in favor of pedophia or bestiality? would you argue that such practices fell within the purview of basic human rights and or liberty???

 

the other point is that set standards of moral conduct have to be maintained from generation to generation otherwise degradation, corruption and collapse of those standards will occur...and to a considerable extent have.

 

 

so asking people of faith to accept a form of secular godlessness without so much as a squawk is not reasonable...

 

nor is it reasonable to characterize legitimate moral objections religious americans have as bigotry, hatred and prejudice.

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9) Medal of Freedom  singer Loretta Lynn

 

Country singer Loretta Lynn, a legend in Nashville whose life story was told in the movie Coal Miner’s Daughter, is also talking about the Republican presidential front runner – and she loves him.

“Trump has sold me – what more can I say?” Lynn told me over the phone just before the start of Trump’s rally Thursday in Rock Hill, South Carolina.

The country icon publicly supported Trump at the end of each of her shows and declared her support at an awards dinner in December — and she says that her fans have been supportive as well.

Jan 9, 2016, Reuters.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Religious types will just have to accept the fact that we don't

live in a Christian equivalent of Iran or Saudi Arabia, where

religious authorities have a significant say in government.

Gay marriage will work out okay and nobody will be disturbed,

except in their feelings. Two hundred years ago slavery was

considered moral by most people. Should that moral institution

have been maintained and not changed? Morals change,

always have, always will.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

New Members:

Register Here

Learn more about the new message boards:

FAQ

Having problems?

Contact Us