Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

CineSage_jr

Members
  • Posts

    3,852
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by CineSage_jr

  1. Hey TOOMANYNOTES You know...I just came on board and have the same trouble with the thread that was changed. That was quite an "explanation/answer" given to you.... What a putdown from somebody that struts while he is sitting down !!!

     

    Message was edited by:

    RockyRoad

     

    There's an old adage in Japan that goes "The nail that sticks up must be hammered down." It's wonderfully emblematic of their conformist society, where most, if not all, traces of individuality are frowned upon and serve as justification for exclusion from the mainstream.

     

    The very idea that something as trivial as what someone writes in the title bar is worthy of discussion and criticism is indicative of a tendency toward conformity in all societies.

     

    The topic of each thread in this forum is about what it's about; though there's obviously going to be a bit of fluidity in the thrust of that discussion, I submit that those conformist tendencies are the underlying causes of these objections, not the content of what I write.

  2. At the moment, I can only think of one........OSKAR WERNER...He did such wonderful work in Ship of Fools, and Farenheit 451....I think I first noticed him in The Spy Who Came in from the Cold. Tragically, he died quite young.

     

    Well, he was a month short of his sixty-second birthday. Not young, exactly, but he definitely died way too soon.

     

    And he was a wonderful actor.

  3. Interesting that in the 1950s Warner's gave composers credit on advertising material, where as other studios, most notably MGM, did not, despite the fact that MGM's chief composer during that period, Mikl?s R?zsa, had a far more lucrative contract with that studio than Max Steiner ever had at Warner Bros.

  4. Toomany, I like to use the title bar as a kind of "Greek chorus" to comment on the overall gist of the discussion -- in a usually ironic fashion; I like to make puns and plays on words, obviously -- and my own specific comments.

     

    The point is that the title of the thread doesn't change, as only the person who started that thread can make such an alteration. As such, I don't understand why anyone would find anything about it confusing.

  5. Mary Badham told me a couple of weeks ago that after her friends back in Alabama saw her wearing the "ham" costume in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD (in the scene where she and Jem are attacked by Bob Ewell and saved by 'Boo' Radley), they never let her forget it, since her last name's "[/u]Bad[/u] Ham."

  6. Let's not forget Cary Grant, who died onstage doing one of his "Evening with Cary Grant" talks after he retired from acting.

     

    Paul Mantz- Hollywood stunt man killed during the filming of The Flight Of The Phoenix.

     

    The sad part about this is Mantz was doing a "protection shot," so that they'd have an extra take of the plane's takeoff in case the first take proved unsatisfactory when viewed in dailies the next day.

     

    The shot used in the film was the first one Mantz completed successfully, that was already in the can.

  7. After he lost his voice, Hawkins continued to work, with his voice dubbed by the British actors Charles Gray and Robert Rietty.

     

    Hawkins also has the distinction of being one of only six (by my reckoning) featured actors to ever appear in three Best Picture Oscar winners.

  8. I'm an oldie now (52), but I remember watching these old B&W 1940's movies even as a 5 or 6 year old. They came on in the mornings when I was growing up and they were old then. Something just fascinated me about them.

     

    I'm 52, but am not the least bit old.

     

    What's the matter with you?

  9. The CD of Elmer Bernstein conducting The Scottish National Orchestra playing the full Orchestral arrangement of the 'Magnificent Seven' music is truly excellent. Go buy it, and play it with the sound cranked all the way up, and tell me I'm wrong.

     

    Buy it if you can find it. The CD, along with its companion recording of Bernstein's THE GREAT ESCAPE, was withdrawn by RCA shortly after it was issued because the discs used photos of Steve McQueen without permission of, and payments to, the McQueen estate. RCA decided that re-pressing the discs was too much trouble, and just ordered the recalled CD's destroyed.

     

    Fortunately, I was able to buy both when they first appeared (and had Elmer autograph them for me before he died).

  10. They don't use nitrate film stock anymore, so the issues aren't the same today. However, color in today's films seem to fade and alter much quicker than Technicolor did.

     

    That has nothing to do with whether the film stock's base is made of nitrocellulose, or modern acetate, mylar or estar. Genuine IB (imbibition) Technicolor employs metallic dyes (which, due to their chemical makeup, have been the same color since the compounds were formed in the gas disc that formed around the Sun and later congealed into the planets) that're applied to the film base color by color, in much the same way that a four-color lithograph is printed.

     

    By contrast, modern color film's images are formed on its emulsion photographically, through the application of light projected through a negative, frame by frame. The chemical process involved never really stablizes fully -- it can only be slowed by keeping the film in a controlled temperature and humidity -- which is why current Eastman stocks eventually turn color and fade.

  11. I'm sure that Wyler was spinning in his grave like chariot wheel at the idea of the film's aspect ratio going in and out like that.

  12. It's really simple:

     

    Go out and buy yourself an eye-patch (very stylish; John Ford and Raoul Walsh wouldn't be seen in public without one), and walk around for a day with your field of vision reduced by 50% (you didn't need that silly depth perception, anyway).

     

    That's the difference between a widescreen film seen in its original proportions, and a blown-up pan-and-scan bowdlerization.

  13. That's a difficult question to answer.

     

    The problem with films in the public domain that it's usually not in the copyright holder's interest to restore and issue PD titles on DVD, because the market's already been flooded with cheap, albeit inferior, copies (there are notable, and noble, exceptions, such as Columbia's DVD of HIS GIRL FRIDAY).

     

    Because of the landmark stature of THE THIRY-NINE STEPS and Hitchcock's reputation, an excellent transfer of the film was made for Criterion DVD. This is probably what gets shown on television, as well.

     

    The most problematic title you mention is probably MEET JOHN DOE, which Frank Capra made at Warner Bros. I assume that the original film and sound elements still reside in the Warner's vaults, and that WBHV will, at some point, undertake a badly needed restoration. There is also scuttlebutt that Warner's is planning a collector's edition of George Cukor's A STAR IS BORN (1954), which will include a third disc of William Wellman's 1937 version (now in the public domain; Warner's bought the rights to the '37 film in order to remake it), which has never been restored.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...