Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

clore

Members
  • Posts

    5,535
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by clore

  1. So, anybody around here wanna venture a guess about this?! Do ya maybe think the score is sometimes cranked up really loud in order to elicit all these here tears?

     

    I couldn't agree more. It's the only thing that I dislike about the film. The characters, the situations - they're enough to elicit my reactions. Friedhofer's score is too obvious in its punctuation of each little detail. It should compliment the scene, not overwhelm it.

  2. Does Tippi not give outros, only intros? After THE UNFAITHFUL, she came on and only said that RO is taking a, you guessed it, well-deserved rest.

     

    Every outro that I saw with any of the three guest hosts did not refer to the movie just aired. There was a "my friend Bob is taking a rest" mention followed by "and he'll be back soon with more classics like the one you just saw and the one which we will have in a few minutes so stick around."

  3. I just watched THE RAG MAN and was quite struck by the new score for it. I ran over to the IMDb to check out the credits of Linda Martinez and my heart sank. This young and gifted woman ended her own life just two years after winning the 2003 Young Film Composers Competition.

     

    I know not what demons drove you to this end, but I hope that your family and fiends can find some measure of solace in that you have left behind a legacy, something for many to appreciate. I do personally know the grip of manic depression and am lucky to have my support group in my worst moments - as well as in my best ones.

     

    Rest in peace.

  4. Some films will really fool you. Take Boetticher's *The Tall T.* We start out with what looks as if it's going to be a light-hearted western. Randolph Scott is grinning, having good times with the father and son at the way station as well as with Arthur Hunnicutt. Then he makes a wager with his old employer, tries to ride a wild one and lands on his butt, and loses his horse in the process. However it's all very much played for amusement.

     

    But when he returns to the way station after being picked up while walking on the road, the film does one of the most incredible 180s that I've seen in any film and there's a valid change in Scott's demeanor. Yet it's seemless, we're so caught up in the characters we've met that we instantly have a hatred for Richard Boone and company and Scott serves as our proxy as we do want vengeance.

     

     

    All in 77 minutes or so.

  5. Still, it all depends on what one is used to seeing. *High Noon* is my favorite western and one of my favorite films since I first saw it on the day that Gary Cooper died. I wasn't even ten years old yet, but I knew this was something special. You don't want to know how many times i've seen it, but probably more times than any other film.

     

    Still, it tears at me when I see complaints about the film that the first hour is nothing but talking and then all that talk was about nothing since the good guy wins fairly easily anyway.

     

     

    Whatcha gonna do?

     

     

    Still, I do prefer films that draw me in like a newspaper story. Give me the who, what, where, why and when up front, a good set-up in other words. Then if you take your time unraveling the story, I don't care. *The Best Years of Their Lives* runs almost three hours, but the initial set-up throws the three characters at you, three obviously diverse types and you can't help but relate to at least one of them. From there we go in three directions, every once in a while we return to the nucleus of three.

  6. This received great reviews when it came out, many cited it as the equal of the Spade and Marlowe films of the 40s. I thought that any weekly episode of Mannix was superior (I didn't catch up to it until 1968).

     

    Decent cast, some good bits in the supporting roles but if it didn't have Newman in it, the film would have faded away quickly. Meanwhile, no one remembers a George Peppard film from 1968 titled *P.J.* which was superior to *Harper* and *Tony Rome* but unceremoniously dumped into neighborhood theaters by Universal.

  7. My TV will be getting a 24 hour rest during Brando day.

     

    Mine also. There are some that I would like to see, if only because I saw them 40 years ago or more - *The Ugly American* and *The Young Lions* come to mind. Unfortunately, most of the schedule is filled with the ones that air constantly anyway.

  8. Thank you.

     

    Ya know, I should have thought of THE RED PONY, especially since it was on one of my HBO channels one morning earlier this week. I didn't watch it though - I had been up all night and just had to get some sleep. I wanted to, but it must have been about 7am and even this insomniac has to sleep sometimes.

     

    It's a great film and I'm always a sucker for a horse story. Of course the film is more than that and there's also the Aaron Copland score. Louis Calhern wears me down, but that's a minor complaint. It could have been worse, he could have been my grandfather.

  9. 'Of Mice and Men' begins with a scene (fleeing from a mob) that runs a few minutes, and then the opening credits come up. Was this not the first time that had beeen done?

     

    Without looking up which came first, there is a similar opening to DESTRY RIDES AGAIN which came out the same year. That's not to say that one influenced the other, it could be that both directors had a similar thought at the same time.

     

    I first saw the film when I was about nine or ten. I cried at the end and even as I approach sixty, I still get tears in my eyes at the end. I've seen three other versions of it on film, none of them has that power. In fact the most recent version with Gary Sinise and John Malkovich almost throws that scene away.

     

    Goodness, the POV shots during the battle in tonight's film are fantastic. This is one that does get better with each viewing.

  10. Robert Walker narrated the end of "My Son John" after both he and his character were dead. He used a tape recorder

     

    I was about ten years old when I saw that film and all I could notice at that age was that it was dull. Mind you, I loved CASABLANCA and MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON at the same age, so it wasn't a matter of needing some fistfights or gun battles.

     

    WB did me a favor and it took nearly 50 years for me to get a chance to see it again. I tried to watch it when TCM aired it a year or two ago, I made it about an hour into it but it was too heavy-handed for me.

     

    Narration is normal, but narration from a supposedly dead character is not common. Now perhaps I was influenced by something that I read when I was young and before I saw the fim, but I do find it highly distinctive thus when it happens, it's highly noticeable as going against the grain. To that end, I can well understand that someone in 1951 might have expected that some trick ending was coming. She wrote of what she felt then and as she had no precedent, her reaction is understandable.

     

    On the other hand, I can well understand someone watching IT HAPPENED TOMORROW as thinking that the whole plot line of Powell's reading his own obit as having no suspense or tension at all. The film opens up with his character all aged and wrinkled and the whole story is a flashback. Obviously the obit can't come true.

  11. Milestone doesn't get enough credit. His version of THE FRONT PAGE may not be as technically slick as the Hawks revamp, but it incredibly advanced for a film made in 1931 and every bit as fast with its dialogue. It's just a shame that the public domain prints don't do it justice.

     

    Besides tonight's film, Milestone also made a great WWII film with A WALK IN THE SUN and THE PURPLE HEART is also a most effective prisoner-of-war drama,. He also made PORK CHOP HILL so he's covered the first three wars of the 20th century.

     

    OF MICE AND MEN is one of the greatest literary adaptations ever. It's just unfortunate that it came out in the banner year of 1939 otherwise I'm certain there would be Oscars on the balance sheet. STRANGE LOVE OF MARTHA IVERS shows him quite able to handle noir elements and HALLELUJAH I'M A BUM is an admirable early musical - he seems able to thrive in all genres.

     

    He did what he could for the 1962 MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY, it certainly looks great even if it does have a controversial performance by its leading man.

     

    I haven't even touched upon his silent films, but I'll take his version of THE RACKET over the sound remake and TWO ARABIAN NIGHTS has some scenes that seem to be a trial run for ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT although it is a comedy.

     

    But the way it goes is that he's not considered an auteur, so critics have overlooked his contributions. Well, there's also something to be said for someone who managed to survive in the studio era for 40 years and direct some genuine classics along the way.

  12. When you throw in all of the CGI enhancements, it really does look as if one day we will not need flash-and-blood actors anymore. It will be as that Al Pacino movie SIMONE predicted, our biggest stars will be computer generated.

     

    I'm sure that right now, someone is feeding every frame of John Wayne into a computer, along with every word he ever uttered on film. We'll end up with computer generated movies featuring stars from the golden age.

  13. That last James Bond film was made for that generation, certainly not for mine. I recall Bond films with lush scenery beautifully filmed, thrilling stunts that set the standard for the industry...

     

    This one was just another cookie-cutter, blue-tinted, kitchen-blender edited mess that may just have ended my interest in the franchise. Even the worst previous Bond films had something going for them in terms of technical execution, THE QUANTUM OF SOLACE will remain the only film in the series that I didn't watch more than once.

  14. Call me crazy but I don't think his character is a "ghost" at all. He's a narrator. That's all folks.

     

    Yes, and usually in a film the narrator is the protagonist of the unfoldiong drama. Also we can usually count on the narrator ending up alive in the final reel. What makes Wilder's film different from most is that his narrator doesn't make it to the end. This must have thrown the audience off somewhat as usually if watching Dick Powell or Robert Mitchum in a noir, or Randolph Scott in a western (and such did happen prior to Wilder's film), and they hear him narrating, they see him alive at the end.

     

    Every time that I've seen SUNSET BOULEVARD, I'm reminded of something that I read many years ago by someone who saw the film upon release. She thought that despite seeing the body in the pool at the beginning, that somehow - as in a Flash Gordon serial perhaps - that the end would reveal that our hero was indeed alive. It's a macabre touch to add to a film and I've read numerous critical appraisals of Wilder's career that point to his deceased narrator as being totally unique in cinema and one more indication of his genius.

     

    Even when AMERICAN BEAUTY came out, some critics did remember Wilder using the same device almost 50 years earlier, but I guess few have seen THE SEVENTH CROSS to note that Zinnemann was there first.

  15. I saw one of those BIG VALLEY episodes on The American Life cable channel a couple of years ago. It was a variation on SO LONG AT THE FAIR in having Victoria and Audra register at a hotel and then the next day Audra is missing and no one believes Victoria that her daughter was ever present.

     

    Except for Sheriff Lew Ayres.

     

    The resolution was just as in the earlier film, only the name of the illness was changed.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...