Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Fedya

Members
  • Posts

    5,412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Fedya

  1. > Fedya, that comment about Crosby fondling little boys. Is that an attempt an humour? I find the comment bizarre, to say the least, and in questionable taste.

     

    That's because there's a word missing. What I meant was Crosby's character.

     

    I hope that makes it less tastless or offensive.

     

    Edited by: TCMWebAdmin on Dec 9, 2012 9:00 PM

  2. > I couldn't disagree more about Katherine Hepburn. Slim, gorgeous, lively, interesting, and intelligently opninionated. What more could a man want?

     

    Hepburn to me comes across in a lot of her movies as a spoiled, self-centered blankety-blank; not the sort of person I'd want to have a romantic relationship with.

     

    Her character in *The Philadelphia Story* richly deserves the treatment she gets from Cary Grant in the opening scene.

  3. > This man was the NUMBER ONE box office star of the 1940's!!!

     

    On the other hand, Bing Crosby did win his Oscar for a role in which his only sex would have been fondling little boys. (Well, maybe his character had sex with the Barry Fitzgerald character.)

  4. Didn't Lassie have puppies in one of the movies?

     

    And I know in the second *Thin Man* movie (the one with James Stewart and Elissa Landi, the title of which I forget), the opening credits mention Mrs. Asta. So he clearly got some action too.

  5. > You seem to be taking all of this a little too personally. Relax.

     

    I thought this was General Discussions, not the Projection Room. :-)

     

    I find it funny that when somebody posts something you don't like in this thread you [take it so personally|http://forums.tcm.com/message.jspa?messageID=8706017#8706017] that you tell them to start a new thread. And then when somebody points out that you're factually wrong, you suggest they're taking it too personally.

     

    Why should people let you get away with posting blatant misinformation?

  6. > "TCM Classic Film News" - First, TCM does promote books on this feature

     

    Hi! This is the TCM Classic Movie News report for {insert month here}. (I always laugh every time I hear that phony "Hi!")

     

    In fact, didn't this month's report mention a book about John Wayne, complete with a whole bunch of photos?

  7. I doubt much if anything in the movie was historically accurate.

     

    The ancients did have many horrifying ways of executing people. Those who aren't squeamish may enjoy reading about [scaphism|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism], which was practiced in ancient Persia.

     

    ObMovies: For a fun if not particularly good movie set in ancient Persia, try *Esther and the King*.

  8. > Problem is there were numerous missing scenes filled in with still photos.

     

    It wasn't as bad as *Greed*, which has about an hour and a half of that.

     

    (Goldwyn should have commissioned a 140-minute version of *Greed* in the first place. I'm sure von Stroheim could have made a great 140-minute film if that was his intent.)

     

    Edited by: Fedya on Dec 8, 2012 2:14 PM, to correct the studio

  9. OK, then, let's take it to the other logical conclusion: destroy all DVDs so that TCM can show whatever it wants without fear of anybody suggesting TCM is only showing it to sell DVDs.

     

    Besides, people should only be allowed to watch things when the copyright holders say so. DVRing and selling copies of the movies is evil evil evil.

     

    They should get rid of individual copies of books, too, and only stream video of the text, so that people can only read the books when the copyright holders say so.

  10. > Actually most Lifetime Movies seem have somewhat generic titles.

     

    May we point and laugh at you for watching Lifetime? :-)

     

    Actually, some of those titles aren't so bad:

     

    > Teenage Bank Heist

     

    Compare to the 1955 movie *Teenage Crime Wave* (which is a low-budget unintentional hoot).

     

    > Holiday Wishes

     

    Didn't Robert Mitchum and Janet Leigh do one called *Holiday Affair* ? If memory serves, Wendell Corey played the drip. (Sorry, I've never seen why anybody would want Corey.)

     

    > A Nanny's Revenge

    > The Perfect Nanny

     

    How could you forget Bette Davis in *The Nanny* (another fun movie)?

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...