casablancalover

> {quote:title=JackFavell wrote:}{quote} > I would love to see people turning on the TV during Jour de Fete, saying "what the heck is this?", *unable to look away*, and then sitting there for the next 5 and a half hours, mesmerized by Tati.... 'unable to look away' - that's the whole theory behind High Definition, you know... At least we have some wonderful things coming up on TCM! Looking forward to your insights too, Jack!

> {quote:title=ccbaxter wrote:}{quote} > And in the case of Tati's films, there really isn't much dialogue. His films are easy to follow, even without reading the sparse subtitles. That's in part what makes his films delightful; they 'speak' with a visual, universal language. Viva La France! And to the French, who do their best expressions without words! ;-) Oops! Maybe cc didn't mean that universal language! *The movies are a delight, BTW. I love the pacing!*

Has anyone mentioned *The Mummy* with Boris Karloff and *The Black Cat* with Lugosi and Karloff? I thought *The Mummy* was sort of funny, because it seemed he walked so slow a turtle could outrun him! But I liked *The Black Cat* for its strange, German expressionism look. And when Lugosi opens the bag in *Dracula* , and shows his women the infant, I always cover my eyes! For me, that scene is the most frightening to me!

Excellent article, Edonline! I didn't know about Charles Durning; that was a real eye-opener. The Guardian online is a great news site. I recommended it for anyone who is interested about world affairs. Message was edited by: casablancalover

Damn! This sounds fun! Can you post some shots? I wonder what the lobby looks like now?

> > Also, it is nice to see that Ben Mankiewicz has toned down both the irony and the sarcasm of late. Though I'll have to catch his intros to some of the Disney films to see if it is lasting. > > Kyle In Hollywood > -------------------------- > "Ooohh, there was a little polecat whose life was poorly spent. > When his father died he found himself > cut off without a (s)cent." > *F. McGee* Kyle, Love the latest Fibber McGee! Though I loved the Daniel the flea as well..

> {quote:title=ILoveRayMilland wrote:}{quote} > > {quote:title=scsu1975 wrote:}{quote} > > I bet you're glad he didn't decide to dress up like Jim Backus. > > Why not? You said that aprons are comfortable. LOL! Awesome! I think this exchange was from the Halloween thread? I love cross comments!

> {quote:title=CineMaven wrote:}{quote} > I was three when he was killed and didn't know of him. But as a film buff I know of him now...and he was lost to us too soon. Sad! I was three as well; it is the date that has remained in the pop culture. Even a movie about the angst teens mourning him is titled, *September 30, 1955* . Around here in the Midwest, the golden oldies folks are still talking about the death of Buddy Holly, the Big Bopper, and Richie Valens after a concert in Clear Lake, near Mason City Iowa. The day the music died, February 3, 1959.

> {quote:title=FredCDobbs wrote:}{quote} > Ha! Maybe it was the first "keyword" in the URL that caused the rejection by a filter: > > http://www.sexy-celeb-photos.com/pictures/BernadettePeters8.jpg You know, with her hair like that, she could have played the bride (Madeline Kahn) in *Young Frankenstein* .

Today marks the anniversary of the death of James Dean. It has always been somber date for me; and while he was so young, he was (with Brando) so idolized by the young at the time. He had quite the history in acting, most of it in television. Only 3 starring roles in motion pictures: *East of Eden* (my favorite) *Rebel Without A Cause* , and *Giant* . But it didn't only consist of those. Check out: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000015/ for his body of work. It is fascinating how he was very busy, and developing his craft on television, often with the "playhouse" type of productions. I appreciate his work yet I do not idolize him. It just seemed his death marked the start of a string of mourning for those who's time ended all too soon. Maybe that, and the date of 9/30/55 seem so significant to me. Does anybody else wonder "what if?" about this fine actor? Message was edited by: casablancalover

Welcome showmemovies! I do not know the program you are talking about, but to further your instruction in any program, please study up on it before you spend a dime! I have some experience with film schools, so here's what I've learned when I sent my son. . . . > {quote:title=showmemovies wrote:}{quote} > Hey everyone! I'm assuming some of you have experience with film schools. I'm very passionate about the film industry but can't get over how much film schools cost. Traditional schooling, sitting in a classroom sounds boring to me. Don't assume that in a traditional film school setting, you are sitting in classrooms all the time. My son attended *University of Southern California*, and two things you should realize: 1. Yes, it is expensive, but if you have the wherewithall (grades and background work) for getting into this school, USC works hard to keep you there, with grants and scholarships. 2. So much of the cost is in part to the continually upgrading of the equiptment and facilities. Even with help from some of the biggest Hollywood A-Listers- (Speilberg/Lucas) it still is a technically challenging medium, and even if your a writer, you need to know something about it. But the program at USC is not all classroom, most of your assignments will be producing film (sorry, even in this digital age) movies. The availibilty of the technology at 'SC around you puts you _far ahead_ in the technical game. > Instead I'm looking into a film school alternative called The Film Connection. Their website is http://www.filmconnection.com Has anyone heard of this program? You actually work one on one with someone already working in the film industry and get hands on experience and make connections for future gigs. I know it's more about who you know than what you know when it comes to the entertainment industry. What do you all think? This is very true; working in the film business is darn near impossible without connections of some sort (a person who is a friend -we are talking real and not imaginary here). My son had wanted to attend USC since he was 12 or 13, and I was really concerned about the cost and the distance (we live in the midwest). USC completely won me over with it's record of employment possibilities. USC grads who've made it look for other grads to hire. Check out the schools- even wikipedia has a good overview of the various film programs out there. *USC School of Cinematic Arts* , *UCLA film school*, *NYU film school* and compare graduate list, connections to working studios and support for you, the student, while you're there. You don't state if you are looking to direct or write or be a part of the process in some significant way. The good schools encourage the different aspects of film making, so you may want to direct, but it's not till your formal education that you realize that the Director of Photography is your true calling. Or film editing, or sound. Or Producing! The best schools help you develop those skills. Good luck on following your passion. It'll take all your passion, and I hope you will realize your dreams; but do it with your feet on the ground and your head screwed on straight.

Hummm.......... It makes me wonder about *Mad Men* .

Thanks for the update, Susan. I glad to see the chemo hasn't dampened your spirits too much! I am reminded of friends who thought the hair loss was the most surprising part of it, and I happy to report that they now again have full heads of hair, and a fine hat/scarf collection! May it be the same for you. You are in our prayers.

> {quote:title=dianabat wrote:}{quote} > Does anyone know why they use Roman Numerals to represent copyright dates in movies? I can't think of a single reason that makes sense. > > Di Maybe to make us think the film is newer by not letting the average viewer figure it out in the .6 seconds its shown on the screen... Message was edited by: casablancalover

Wow ! There's that magical date again! Long live Jimmy Dean! Maybe will start the thread on that tomorrow. I always think about that date. It is a somber day.

So many heartfelt thoughts and expression of gratitude to this wonderful actor and great man. May I add my condolences to the Newman family.

> {quote:title=CineSage_jr wrote:}{quote} > > The difference is that Lucy's husband is ordinarily dead, whereas Capt. Gregg is extraordinarily dead. . . . .He's not merely dead; he's really most sincerely dead! -to paraphrase the munchkins!

SO. . . . Is that a ghost I saw you with last night, or just another late husband? She forgets the dead man she was married to, to fall for another man who's dead? This is the problem I have with this storyline. Maybe she would like to explain how her husband is actually in heaven (no, that's problematic) !

I have asked this before on the posts, but no one has a take on it: Why did the writers (Dick and Dunne) of *The Ghost and Mrs Muir* make Mrs Muir a widow ? In the storyline, wouldn't it have made more sense to have her be a divorced woman?

Lafitte- I have started a thread; because I have a question about a movie. . . .

> {quote:title=markfp2 wrote:}{quote} > Obviously, we don't know if his new contract will allow him to remain with TCM, but if it does I would think that he'll tape all his intros at once a month, like Robert Osborne does, so he could do all of them in one day. I would think that it would be good for "AT THE MOVIES to still have him on TCM because it would open up cross-promotion possibilities with them and work in everybody's favor. > > Good luck, Ben! Absolutely! If I were in charge of TCM, that would be my first thought, and the $$$ would start flashing in my eyes! Just like in the cartoons!

Whoa, everybody! I like *Mad Men* - in much the same way I like to watch the Films of TCM, a unique vision! As far as fears of TCM becoming like AMC for the move toward original programming for the reach of Emmy's - I would have to say no. The strength of an Emmy to increase audience, I would like to see that. I don't think it happens, personally. Maybe the studios put bank on Oscars, but I don't think it translates the same way for Emmy's. I just haven't read any insightful articles about how an Emmy win increased an audience for a program; also, some programs will not be shown again, after the Emmy's. And yes, I agree, the hosts last night were pretty lame. I fell asleep before it ended!

Absolutely ! ! ! *Snoopy: OOOooooooooooooooooooooooooo . . . . . . .*

> {quote:title=CineSage_jr wrote:}{quote} > Let's not forget Gordon Pinsent as the Kennedy?sque president (his name is never given) in COLOSSUS: THE FORBIN PROJECT. A fine, believable performance in an unfortunately underrated, neglected little gem of a movie. And let's not forget that Gordon Pinsent was Paul Gross' father in *Due South* ! I love him even as a spirit. *Long live Benton Fraser*, and well, since Robert Fraser was already dead when the show started.....

Ha-Ha ! ! ! That's great casting! Especially in the scene where Tina Fey reaches into her Briefcase and pulls out the Vise-grips to put Jon Voight back in his place when tries to start to run the WH. Holy Alexander Haig ! ! ! Then, she will make the pronouncement: *"Guys an' Gals ! Lets all turn on our Outdoor lights to show our support of the President as his jet flys overhead!"*