Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

nightwalker

Members
  • Posts

    997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nightwalker

  1. Glad you enjoyed it, Bronxie. As I said, a satisfying Stewart movie most of the way. And yes, I agree that he really does blow the younger cast members off the screen.

     

    SPOILER ALERT:

     

    I think you might have misunderstood what I referring to earlier, Bronxie. I was talking about Stewart's (to me) totally unrealistic response to Glenn Corbett's killer. To me, Stewart, in spite of his experiences during the film's course of events, would still be more likely to blow him away or at least demonstrate his extreme dissatisfaction with that occurrence in some way, rather than basically accepting him into the family, possibly as a surrogate figure for Corbett.

     

    In any case, that scene just didn't ring true for me. If it did for you, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one!

  2. I see your point, CS, but I don't think that Webb/Lydecker's obsession with Laura was sexual in any way. Remember, in his mind, he created her and made her what she became: a successful, stylish, confident career woman. In this sense, Webb/Lydecker had the same function as Pygmalion (or Henry Higgins, if you like). His "obsession" stems from the fact that she is, in a sense, his creation.

     

    I think this is brought out rather well by Webb's line near the film's end when Laura chooses Mark MacPherson over him: "I hope you'll never regret what promises to be a disgustingly earthy relationship!"

     

    I think that says it all about Webb/Lydecker's attitude towards sex.

  3. A case could probably be made that Stewart is "spoofing" his Mann character in THE CHEYENNE SOCIAL CLUB, but then, since the whole movie is a spoof, it's not too hard for him to do!

     

    The others you name are more by way of being variations on a theme. FIRECREEK has easygoing, bumbling, almost timid Jimmy in a role that Hank Fonda could have played if he weren't playing the heavy! BANDOLERO! and, to a lesser degree, HOW THE WEST WAS WON both have loveable rogue Jimmy. All worth seeing, all types of parts Jimmy's done before, but not among my favorite Stewart roles.

     

    SHENANDOAH is a different matter altogether. It's another hard-bitten part for Stewart as he plays a man who insists on staying out of the Civil War because it's not "his" war. The main plot has to do with Stewart's quest to free his youngest son who's been taken prisoner by some Union soldiers. Unfortunately, I found the final scenes unrealistic as far as Stewart's reaction to a real bummer of a plot development were concerned. I've never felt that his character would respond in the manner he did. I can't really say more without giving away too much, but most of the way, SHENANDOAH is good and Stewart is in fine Mannish form - just that last sequence didn't ring true for me.

  4. Hey, Bronxie.

     

    Just caught up with this thread and the news about your mother. I join with everyone in wishing her a speedy and complete recovery (and yes, I'll take a blanket!)

  5. Well, thank you for those kind words, Bronxie. It's nice to be missed.

     

    Agree about Hank in Yours, Mine and Ours, although, actually, I found Lucy's character here to be much less scatterbrained (and therefore, much more likeable) than her Lucy Ricardo.

    Her drunk scene was an absolute delight! And then Hank: "The Board of Inquiry is now in session!"

     

    And actually, not only Jimmy, but all the cast in FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX end up looking somewhat grizzled by film's end, however, as I recall, Jim kind of starts out that way, too! And you're right: his character isn't all that removed from his character in his Mann westerns. He's a flawed individual trying to do the best he can under (in this case) extremely difficult conditions.

     

    Because he's flawed, he makes us actually wonder if he'll be able to see the situation through, but because it's Jimmy Stewart, we shake our heads and say "Oh, of course he will (what was I thinking?)," thus creating that tension between what Stewart conveys to us as an actor (the "flawed" part) and what we expect from a character played by him at this point in his career.

  6. Hi Bronxie!

     

    If I may chime in, I agree with CS that FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX is good latter-day tormented (to a degree) Stewart.

     

    The Fonda-Ball film from 1968 you are referring to is YOURS, MINE AND OURS.

    It's true that Hank keeps himself reigned in here, as he seems to do in all his comedies, but he does have a way with wry, dry humor that comes through, and the film is very enjoyable.

  7. A similarly-themed film which may interest you is the 1969 TV-Movie WAKE ME WHEN THE WAR IS OVER, starring Ken Berry as a bumbling officer who accidentally falls out of a plane and is taken "captive" by German Baroness Eva Gabor, who takes a fancy to him and, consequently, doesn't tell him that the war has ended. Five years later, he leaves her estate for the first time and determines to do what he can to "defeat" the Germans.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...