Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

mrroberts

Members
  • Posts

    4,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by mrroberts

  1. One of the many lessons to be learned from all of this; NO ONE is infallible. We have our heroes and idols, put them on the pedestal, think them perfect, etc. They are not. Sometimes they get too caught up in their fame and that leads to their downfall. In a movie I just hope Joe is treated fairly and honestly, but that may not be as great as you may think.

  2. A guy in Paterno's position should have seen that the situation was investigated throughly and immediately , and if any crime was committed that the police be notified. And he certainly had the clout to see that happen. The "crime" here is giving the college football program image higher priority then the welfare of young kids. A lot of top people in the university have to answer for this and unfortunately some innocent people will suffer too. As far as the kids are concerned every effort must be made to identify ALL that may have been abused and help them thru consoling, etc. --- To tie this into a movie forum subject, surely there will be one (maybe several) movies made about this disgusting mess. Hopefully the film makers will do a good job addressing the many issues here.

  3. What I couldn't remember was whether Hallie had anything in the box before they rode out to the Duke's burned out house and got a cactus rose. If she brought the box along all of the way out on the train ride you would think something was in it. She would have taken that out at the undertaker and then used the empty box to get the rose. Small detail, but its funny how some of us pick up on those things. Maybe there was some brief scene cut from the film that would have shown her removing an item from the box at the undertaker.

  4. It really is a shame that this thread with its lame title has to keep being moved to the top of the board, so this will be my last comment on this, and I hope this thread just fades away to the back pages. To start with the original topic; Lorraine Bracco does the intros for some movies on TCM. I saw several of them, it is obvious that it was rather awkward for her to do this. I don't know the lady so there's nothing personal in this for me. I do know that I have never been very good at speaking in front of groups or for a taping so I have a bit of sympathy going here for her. I do appreciate her and the others for doing these intros, I don't think anyone is getting rich from this work. So the fact is, she didn't do a "great" job at this and the performance speaks for itself. Why must some people feel a need to pile on and get abusive about this? There is something to be said about the anonymous nature of these forums, people can say whatever they want without fear of accountability for it. Do they feel a sense of power in this, that they can be abusive to others who can't defend themselves? I am all for criticism when it is constructive in nature and doesn't get personal. So why can't everyone have a little respect for others (the subject matter and the other posters) in their comments?

  5. According to IMDb, Sid Melton's first film appearance was in *Shadow of the Thin Man* 1941. I remembered him being in that movie, but I didn't know it was his first film. *Shadow of the Thin Man* was also Donna Reed's second film (in a major costarring role too), it was Barry Nelson's first film and the very first film for Ava Gardner (in a brief scene).

  6. *The Invisible Man* is a great classic film in its own right. But we can also be very grateful that it opened the door for Claude Rains to go from the stage to movies. If he hadn't been cast to play that role (ironically it was solely because of his voice) he may have stayed on the stage, and think of the many movie acting roles he wouldn't have done. What a loss that would have been!

  7. Apparently he changed professions after the stock market crash of 1929. I guess he had to eat. :) He appears in quite a few well known films including the prison warden in *Manhattan Melodrama* , the crooked judge in Jimmy Stewart's *Destry Rides Again* and of course Jimmy's father Peter Bailey in *Its A Wonderful Life* .

  8. To restate my main point, TCM has to have an interest in getting respectable ratings in order to exist. So if tonight at 8pm est and 10pm and midnight (to cover prime time across the country) TCM plays some of those often played films its for a reason. To generate some decent ratings numbers to sell the station. People keep bringing up the issue about films that get played over and over until they get sick of it. Try watching FMC or AMC or HBO or Showtime or whatever. See how often they repeat the same movies over and over. The USA network plays NCIS and the Law and Order series reruns constantly. They must have a reason, it gets them ratings. So the next time we look at the schedule and "North By Northwest" or "Gaslight" or whatever is on for the hundredeth time be glad. Those movies pull in the general public which gives TCM good ratings to exist and then we can watch our obscure little noir or western or precode films at the oddball times. -- P.S. this isn't directed at Fred, its for everybody. Fred, spesaking about Pearl Harbor, tonight at 11 pm est TCM is showing *Here Comes The Navy* . A fun little flic starring James Cagney, Pat O Brien and filmed on the U.S.S. Arizona in 1934.

     

    Edited by: mrroberts on Nov 4, 2011 3:06 PM

  9. Clore, I have a question about TCM and the need for ratings. (refer to my previous post). TCM doesn't sell advertising space so they don't need ratings for that revenue stream. But TCM must sell itself to the cable/satellite services so they will carry TCM. And TCM is almost always part of a "premium" channel package. *So if TCM doesn't have a decent ratings performance would anyone bother to carry them on their service?* I have to believe that the need to reach a certain level of viewer ratings pushes TCM programmers to put well known popular films on, especially during the prime time evening hours. So when TCM shows "North By Northwest", "From Here To Eternity", or similar popular classics on a regular basis, I have no problem with that. I can see the necessity in doing it. Thats the lifeblood for TCM and makes it possible for them to also show us the rare or offbeat "classics" that people like us want to see.

     

    Edited by: mrroberts on Nov 4, 2011 11:28 AM

  10. Carolyn Jones, I 've been watching her as of late. In her most famous role as Morticia in The Addams Family. She was a very interesting actress, not the classic beauty but she sure could be sexy. She would have been a great femme fatalle in the noir era. She came along just a few years too late for that. Just reading about her on Wiki, she was going to do the role in *From Here To Eternity* that went to Donna Reed. Carolyn got sick and Donna Reed replaced her. Another one of those "what if" moments.

  11. *Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea* was one of those very first tv shows I watched as a kid. Its funny now, remembering some of these actors, like Richard Basehart, Ernie Borgnine , etc , as TV stars first. Then you get to see these guys doing their movie roles, often done years before their tv series. The tv shows were only a small part of their successful careers. After watching Basehart in his movies his tv role seems so insignificant to me now. He could have done Admiral Nelson in his sleep.

  12. For me , *From Here To Eternity* plays too much like a soap opera. And I have never been a soap opera fan. But I really like the movie's cast and they all give a great performance. Burt was just playing bigger then life Burt (And I am a big fan). Monty and Deborah Kerr, both should have gotten their Oscars for this film. Frank was very good, I know its his "comeback", but Ernie Borgnine was just as good. So who should get the Oscar there? And Donna Reed, again a great performance, and going she's playing against type. But Thelma Ritter should have won for *Pickup On South Street* . -- Again we have the topic of too much airplay on TCM. But if you listen to radio, certain "classics" get played "all of the time". Why? Because over time the general public puts these films /songs up on the pedestal. Many people can watch/ listen to them over and over again. So they will pull the ratings. No one seems to consider that fact. If TCM plays some rarely seen or known film some of us will appreciate that and watch it. But the general public will just skip over it. But when TCM plays a known "biggy" like FHTE many people will tune in. TCM has to give ratings some consideration, right?

     

    Edited by: mrroberts on Nov 3, 2011 5:41 PM

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...