Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

CineMaven

Members
  • Posts

    10,753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CineMaven

  1. Morning G-Man: "Yes, I am admitting the horrible truth: I still haven't watched In a Lonely Place. I ADORE Gloria Grahame and I'm also a fan of Bogie and Ray. In a Lonely Place is also the favorite noir of my favorite noirist, Eddie Muller. There are many, many reasons for me to watch the film, with my great fondness of Gloria being the biggest reason. I guess I've been distracted by the queen of hearts."

     

    You probably have a life away from the boards and much on your plate. Just know that many of us look forward to reading your thoughts on films that we hold dear, since you write so well. Patience is a virtue.

     

    Guess we'll have to be patient.

  2. HollywoodKyle, I concur with you wholeheartedly. This Message Board is NOT a Personals column, though on-line acquaintainceships certainly have happened. You've expressed my thoughts very well.

     

    (For me, one thing I do check is the number of responses to a particular thread. That tells me something).

     

    Newbies feel welcomed...but read hlywdkjk's response in this thread to get an idea on how to have a great experience on the TCM Message Board.

  3. I am also a Kim Novak fan. My favorite film of hers is "VERTIGO" of course.

     

    Glad to see "Strangers When We Meet" is coming up. When she implores Kirk not to kiss her, but stands there to be kissed...ahh. She's the sexiest suburban housewife I've ever seen. "Picnic" "Boys NightOut" "Pal Joey" (poor Rita) and others...

     

    She was voluptuous and had a gr-r-r-reat voice to whisper sweet nothings.

     

    Happy B'day Kim Novak!

  4. You register today...you post a bunch of threads today. And you wonder why you're not welcomed.

     

    Hmmm...

     

    That might be the problem with new members. Creating numerous threads instead of just perhaps responding to existing threads. Creating numerous threads every five minutes. I try to answer a thread that has an interesting topic, but I also notice how many responses a thread gets. When no one answers you...that's some kind of barometer.

     

    Newbies...ALL are welcomed. But I feel there's a big BUT:

     

    1. Dumping personal information on us and begging for friendship may not be the way to go on a Message Board where folks want to talk about Gable & Lombard & Loy & Sheridan & Fonda & Rita-Lana-Ava et al.

     

    2. Self-aggrandizing plugging may not be the way to go to encourage dialogue when folks want to argue the merits of Sturgess over Ford or Hitchcock over Wyler or Stevens over Ed Wood.

     

    I dunno folks...I've had a good experience here. I've been lambasted and I've been praised. If someone is too obnoxious, I put them on IGNORE. I try not to hog up or clog up the forums with thread after thread after thread every two minutes. I sarcastically tease but I am respectful to folks and hopefully encouraging.

     

    I'm sorry your time on the Board hasn't been that good. :-(

  5. "Any other takes on O'Toole and why he lost to Forrest Whitaker. Hell, James McAvoy had more screen time than Forrest. I don't get the academys refusal to give Oscar to Peter."

     

    Newbie, my take is that Whitaker played the HELL out of the role of a demented dictator. It doesn't matter how much screen time young McAvoy had. Whitaker's performance was riveting and O'Toole played a doddering old man in love with a younger woman. He could've phone that in. No disrespect to O'Toole. It's common knowledge he is one of the greats.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...