Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Bargar

Members
  • Posts

    1,272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Bargar

  1. Beal is a intelligent and articulate broadcaster who has reached his breaking point.

    Is he a "puppet" or "crazy like a fox". If he is aware he is being manipulated, he

    does not care. As if to say "Go ahead use me!" The powers that be ARE using him

    for ratings and he is not too far gone to realize that. He doesn't care what happens

    to him or anyone or anything. We the viewer cheer him because we are manipulated

    into thinking his cause is just and he is saying certain things we wish we could say.

    We are angry with the "powers". How dare they profit from this man and yet

    we are cheering him on from the "stands". Prescient? Absolutely.

     

    Rhodes is a ignorant hillbilly with a loud mouth who could have put up a tent in the

    middle of a field and become an evangelist. Some of society does not care how

    salvation is presented as long as they are promised healing and a road to heaven.

    Rhodes uses television to gather a crowd of non-believers or discouraged people

    and reels them in. (Jimmy Baker sound familiar) He is bombastic and crude and

    turns that into cracker barrel country charm. Intelligent P. Neal falls in lust with

    her total opposite and is thrilled with her "monster". A. Franciosa is palpable

    in his faux pimp role. And....Lee Remick, young and impressionable, falls for

    the fame and power. Poor Lonesome, one day you are on top of the world, the

    next you are....well very lonesome. Old story.

     

    I believe societal with a little psychology thrown it in both films

  2. Eloquently stated, Izcutter. I say "Amen" to your words!! YES.....WE......CAN!

     

    Once more, we have hopeful expectations. We have the beginning of relief from

    fear.

     

    Watching the "I have a dream" speech was the icing on the cake. I had been

    weepy all evening and then seeing the devoted M.L.King, Jr. speak those immortal

    words once again, I cried tears of joy. Joy, because I AM a older ;) citizen, and

    I have been around for many atonishing moments in time and this one gives me

    hope for the future of my Grandson and all young people everywhere. My heart

    is full.

  3. ChiO and all: I finally watched this movie and I don't know where to begin. The first

    thing that struck me was the multiple voyeurism going on in the beginning of the film.

    Mark's father watching Mark, Mark watching the couple on the bench, adult Mark

    watching himself, and the audience watching all.

     

    The film is full of symbolism. Helen's mother's intuition about Mark even though she is

    blind. The scene in the store in which the old man is buying dirty pictures and along

    comes a fresh-faced young girl buying candy, creating a contrast. Mark's father's books

    stood out like a sore thumb on the bookshelves full of possible leather-bound or first

    editions. His father's books were covered in paper and pastel dust jackets.

     

    Is there a reason all of the main female characters are redheads?

     

    I also kept thinking "snuff films", only with just two participants. The photographer and

    his subject.

     

    One other little piece of voyeurism was Helen's as she is backing out of the room while

    watching Mark's film,for a slight moment,she is fascinated.

     

    All in all, I think this is very good example of voyeurism with a sadistic twist. Bg

  4. Thanks for the info. I am a huge Bogie fan. Let's see. March is in time for Mother's/Father's

    Day. My anniversary is in April. As you can see, I am looking for an excuse to buy this

    book. Gift cards are great. ;)

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...