Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

slappy3500

TCM_allow
  • Posts

    1,050
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by slappy3500

  1. Speaking of the remake of "King Kong" I think we can lay a share of blame about 9/11 at ol' Dino's doorstep. If Kong handn't been on top of the twin towers jumping around and weakening their structure...

  2. Lolite, I grew up in the same era. I remember in the early 60's you could go to the matinee in my town for a quarter. A dime for coke and another for a box of candy and you had an afternoon at the movies for under half a buck! And that included a travelogue ,a cartoon, a short subject, a 2 reel comedy such as the stooges or more rarely a Thelma Todd/Pasty Kelly plus the feature. Hard to believe that this was only 40 years ago.

  3. One of the most common errors is to show people riding horses in ancient times using stirrups. These (to us) obvious items of tackle were not invented until the middle ages, which is why calvary and mounted knights did not become important until fairly recent times. Of course it's easy to see that it would be difficult to show large numbers of horsemen in movies WITHOUT them given the modern lack of people who could ride without 'em. Also in many films showing Roman legions in battle, the soldiers are wearing brass ceremonial armor which was usually only used at formal functions such as triumphs, parades etc.While in battle Roman troops wore practical (and strong) iron armour and chain mail. This would be like film makers in the future showing the battles of Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal fought by marines wearing their dress blues. Granted these are nit picky details but that's what the topic is about, right? :)

  4. I think that the shock value of the rape scene made people overlook some great acting (by all 4 principals) as well as a terrific survival story. In my opinio, however the rape scene in "Deliverence" was no more gratuitous than the shower scene in "Psycho". The brurality of the scene is nesicary to the plot. The savagery seems to justify the later killing of the mountain man up on the cliff. The audience must identify with the fear and retribution that seems to justify this act. The viewer then also experiences the doubt and guilt the characters feel when it turns out there is some uncertainty as to whom they actually killed. A top-notch film.

  5. Yes there are similarities and I like both films, but "Dr Strangelove" has a distinctly anti-American flavor. It was based on Peter George's novel "Red Alert". George (who is Brittish)once said in an interview "I believe that all American generals are basically insane." No other nation's generals : only AMERICAN generals. In the film General Buck Turgidson (George C. Scott)is only slightly less crazy than General Jack D. Ripper who sends a bomber wing against the USSR to safeguard America's "precious bodily fluids." When accused by the president of advocating "mass murdwer" Turgidson claims, "I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed...but no more that 10 to 20 million killed tops....depending on the breaks." Thus the main difference in the 2 films is that "Failsafe" warns that nuclear war may be triggered by accident because the instrumentality of war has become too complicated for human beings to control and "Strangelove" postulates that the main danger is that darn wacky American military. Note the snide shot of the billboard outside Burpleson Airforce base with SAC's motto "peace is Our Profession".

  6. Sorry Ned. I thought for SURE I gave ya the win, but it appears I didn't I SAW your answer. Maybe it was one of those days the forum wouldn't let me post. A belated WTG Ned! The prize is dinner for two at your own home!

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...