Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

rohanaka

Members
  • Posts

    5,834
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by rohanaka

  1. The Apostle--(though for me choosing between these two was like choosing between tonsillitis and strep throat.) :-)

     

    A Man Called Peter or Chariots of Fire (just to get a little different perspective on faith) :-)

  2. Gary Cooper

     

    I agree--it was a great start for him...I just wished he'd had a little more time on screen....later on in the film when the "bubble" scene was going on all I could think was ..."You only had Gary Cooper on here for what...2 minutes??...and these bubbles have lasted almost half an hour!!" :-)

  3. Hi Miss G! I just had to jump in here and post some thoughts about the film I watched last night. (I already made a post in the "Classic FX" thread too, but wanted to talk a little more about the film WINGS.

     

    I stayed up way too late last night--..first I watched the last 35-40 minutes of the Westerner---wish I'd come in a little sooner, but got busy and couldn't get to it. I've seen it before a while back--but anyway-when it was over they announced that Wings was the next movie scheduled and I decided to check it out as I'd always wanted to see this film. You'd think I'd do a better job of checking the TCM schedule so stuff like this doesn't catch me by surprise--but oh well.)

     

    Boy oh boy--what a wonderful film. I don't have a huge amount of experience watching silent film. But I did not miss the sound at all. The story was so exciting and the characters were so good....it was not really necessary that I heard their actually "voices" speaking lines. In fact-I thought compared to a some of the other silent's I've seen, the dialogue flows very naturally in this film. And in between the dialogue is the "narration" that was so descriptive and well written that to me it made it seem like I was getting the best of both worlds...a film and a novel all at the same time.

     

    At first, I thought I had this story pegged and I knew how it was going to end--who would come home....who wouldn't...etc. I have to say-I was right about the "who" part but WAY off on the "how". The twists and turns in this story were a wonderful surprise. And the aerial fight scenes and the other effects were all extremely well done--especially considering when this movie was made.

     

    The three main characters...Jack, David, and Mary were very well written and well developed. At first, I thought Jack would be my favorite...because the first thing you find out about David is that he's the richest guy in town--and that usually means he's a jerk...But--NOT SO! And I have to say he soon stole my heart. And it is so touching the way Mary pines for Jack and decides to go "over there" to do her part as well--or is it just so she can be closer to him?? Either possibility fits perfectly with her character to the point that I think she went for both reasons.

     

    And the "incidental" characters in this story were terrific too. I thought El Brendel was hilarious --everytime he goes to take off his jacket to show his tattoo--people think he'd getting ready to duke it out instead...and young Mr. Cooper...what a pup! I wish his character had had a few more moments on screen. But the little you saw of him....you knew everything about who he was( at least you think so--until they found that picture of his mom later on) And I also thought David's parents were just heartbreaking. The scene where he is leaving to go off to war and his mother tells him to bring back the "little bear" to her....Oh--the kleenex box was too far for me to reach it in time--I had to use the corner of my shirt sleeve instead. :-)

     

    Well..I could go on and on all day... but will just say that this is one of the best "war stories" I've ever seen. But mainly because the "story" wasn't the war....It was these three characters and how their lives changed and their friendships grew and developed at a result of the war. I hope I get a chance to see this film again sometime....next time I will try to set the VCR.

     

    Thanks for letting me "ramble on!" :-)

     

    Message was edited by: rohanaka

  4. I stayed up way too late last night and watched the TCM presentation of the silent film Wings. I'd never seen it before but it was on my list of "Movies I want to watch some day"so I was really glad to finally get a chance to see it. What a great story! I could go on and on all day about what I thought about the story itself and the individual characters (maybe I will post all that somewhere else). But I was bowled over by the way it was filmed as well. I did some searching this morning and could not find much in the way of specific information on how some of the effects were actually shot, but I did find out that not only was Wings the first movie ever to win the academy award for best picture, but it also won a special award for "effects engineering".

     

    And there were some really well done effects in this film--(especially if you consider the time--1927)There were guys crashing in planes, people getting shot (and blood gushing out of them)cars getting blown up, soldiers getting run over by tanks, buildings being bombed and caving in, spectacular aerial fight scenes--(Oh! the fight scenes!) and there were even silly little bubbles floating around during a "drunk" scene. Everything (except maybe the bubbles) was a very realistic looking portrayal of war and how it is carried out.I especially liked the scene with the huge German "Gotha" plane --not only was this plane much larger for real, but it was filmed in such a way that it really made it seem liked it was just this HUGE flying dragon...more or less the way it was described in the story as well.

     

    The only thing I thought could have been better done was "Jack's" makeup. When he comes home from the war..he's a "man" now and not a "boy" and they went a little insane with the gray hair.(he was only gone a few years...not a few decades) But anyway, that's about the ONLY negative thing I can think to say about the visual aspects of this film.

     

    Maybe some of you more "expert" post-ers have some interesting facts or trivia you have learned about the making of this spectacular movie that you would like to share. And if you are one of those who hasn't seen this film...think about adding it to YOUR list of "movies you want to see someday". I highly recommend it.

  5. is that your nickname for him

     

    Actually I mean the REAL Father Time...you know--old guy with a beard, hour glass, etc... And I do think that his inherent love of gray may be a Grimesian thing--that's why I am sure he and Frank must be related somehow. Maybe they are one and the same...has anyone ever seen them together at New Year's Eve parties?? The plot thickens...inquiring minds want to know! :-)

  6. Well...the thought never occurred to me...HMM Grey guy--Father Time....perhaps he's a distant relative--because(sad but true) I am probably noticeably older than Mr Grey Guy...but SURELY Father Time is older than me....at least I hope so anyway!! Perhaps Frank is his long lost nephew or second cousin twice removed or something!! It all makes sense to me now!! :-)

  7. I even know how to do hilights

     

    Oh Gee--what I wouldn't do to have a chance to just get a haircut right about now...let alone go to a 'hairdresser" My early summer "do" is definitely done!

     

    I used to work with this gal who would always color her hair one color in the early spring--a lovely light fawn color and then she would do this real deep auburn at the first of fall. And she didn't ease her way into the new color--just one day she would show up at work and WHAMMO--a whole new person. It was very dramatic....but she was just one of those people who could pull it off.

     

    I've never been brave enough to do the color thing..but I do get my hilights done all the time....by a male hairdresser no less...FATHER TIME! But unfortunately he only has one color in stock--and he never seems to run out of it---gray...lots and lots of GRAY--(or is it GREY???) :-)

  8. I can't imagine a better Elmer Gantry than Burt

     

    I agree he was excellent. I just remembered that I think this film was one of the ones we watched in my film lit class when I was in college ( so long ago....Ronald Reagan was still president--the first time! )at any rate I have tried to watch it a few times since and it is just not for me...But Burt is very powerful in it, there's no denying that.

     

    PS--in keeping with the theme of this thread....TWICE this week--stopped for lemonade Icees!!! I may need to join a support group or something...and what's worse is--I've managed to addict my daughter as well....oh--what will we do come November and Icees are not on the menu...the HORROR!! :-)

  9. You got it! This is not necessarily my favorite movie, but it is probably my favortie Sean Connery movie. And I love how he talks to Costner in this scene because it sort of sets the framework for his character's personality in the rest of the story from that point on.

     

    Take it away...cmvgor!

  10. I came across this thread tonight in a search for where to plant this post...There were several other older threads on character actors, but a lot of the posts on this one seem to center on my favorite -Walter Brennan.I haven't seen any more recent threads on this topic--forgive me if I overlooked one--So I thought this was as likely a place to post this on as any. So--again--forgive me if I am duplicating anything...

     

    Earlier I looked on the TCM site to find out for sure how to spell Brennan's last name for another post I was making and I came across his bio....(hope this link works)

     

    http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/participant/participant.jspparticipantId=21833|153238&afiPersonalNameId=null

     

    If not...just go to the tcm movie database and type in his name...he led a pretty interesting life and there were some very unexpected statistics in there about him (like his service in the military and an explanation about his voice and his teeth--or the lack thereof. :-)

     

    I have always enjoyed Walter Brennan in films. He can play almost anything...pathetic simpleton guy, codgerly old gripey guy, goodnatured ruffian guy, really rotten bad guy, decent sort of hard working guy, folksey friendly neighborly guy, hilarious wisecracking geezer guy....Ok enough is enough. But you get my point.

     

    I think my favorite films of his are with John Wayne and also with Gary Cooper. With Duke he just seemed born to play the funny western sidekick--guy( I think I left that one out of my "guy list") and he got to do a little wider range of characters in his films with Cooper--a pastor, a hardnosed western "legend", a wiser-than-he-seems friend and traveling companion.

     

    I've always enjoyed his films ( he made a ton of them) and I look forward to discovering new ones I've yet to watch so I can see what sort of "guy" I need to add to my list of characters for him.

     

    I am sure this thread can handle anyone else's favorites if someone wants to post them. I have several other character actors whom I also enjoy watching. But for my money Walter Brennan has to be at the top of the list. Thanks for letting me post!

     

    (Well my link did not work..they hardly ever do...but hope anyone interested will check out his bio on the movie database....very interesting--for fans anyway). :-)

     

    Message was edited by: rohanaka

  11. Talk about traveling in style

     

    Those were the days...I think it would have been fun to take a long journey on one of those trains like they were way back in the day. The furthest I ever went by train was from Kansas City to St, Louis and that was well over 25 years ago...I saw some nice scenery out the window off and on, but all in all, not a very glamourous trip. However it sure beat the bus ride I took going the same way a couple of years later. :-)

     

    I used to have a coworker who used to work on a passenger train several years ago (I don't remember his exact job though--but he may have worked in the dining car) He brought in a photo album one day of pictures he took when he worked there. But as nice as they were, they still don't match up to the images you see in the older films of passenger trains and the way people used to travel.

  12. I was thinking of this scene when I was talking elsewhere on here about The Quiet Man and then I saw a little frog and I remembered it again...

     

    From ET: "Back to the forests! Back to the river!"

     

    (when Elliot sets all the frogs free from Biology class)

     

    (I first saw this movie over 25 yrs ago, way back when it came out in the theaters--and to this day whenever I see a little frog or toad out in the yard or wherever, that's the first thing I think of.)

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...