Kid Dabb

I did say "you'all get credit" - the both of youz. And you both clocked in at the same time.

Pal (the real, and first Lassie) portrayed Lassie from the begining up to the TV series. Pal was used in the two TV Pilot episodes and then retired. Then eight generations of Pal took over begining with the TV episodes after the pilots. They were: Lassie Junior, Spook, Baby, Mire, and Hey Hey.

Here's your answer http://forums.tcm.com/thread.jspa?threadID=168008&tstart=0

Here's your answer http://forums.tcm.com/thread.jspa?threadID=168008&tstart=0

HA! GOTCHA!! This is not Lassie. This is Lassie Jr. No matter, you'all still get credit

This looks exactly like one metz would post, and probably has already

For the purposes of this question, *Fame is the Name...* would not be correct to use as a clue. This is an earlier production filmed in November 1955 and broadcast March 10, 1956 on the CBS television network as a 90-minute episode of the series Ford Star Jubilee+.+ Who is the actress in question? Edited by: Kid_Dabb on Jan 15, 2013 4:45 PM because this message editor ain't gettin' it

Who's this?

The Private Lives of Adam and Eve (1960)

Yes Ma'am!!! Favorite line from film's writing genius.. I can't take it anymore, Felix, I'm cracking up. Everything you do irritates me. And when you're not here, the things I know you're gonna do when you come in irritate me. You leave me little notes on my pillow. Told you 158 times I can't stand little notes on my pillow. "We're all out of cornflakes. F.U." Took me three hours to figure out F.U. was Felix Ungar!

Conceived as a result of an affair with a family friend, I lived in what I would call 'a very black period in my life in a bad slum area'. I made my Broadway debut on the eve of my 19th birthday to the pleasure of critics. Shortly after my 20th birthday, I was signed to appear with a very big male star in what is regarded as the first made-for-television film.

Thank you, lavenderblue That reminds me of his character in The Americanization of Emily.

You'd have to be pretty sleepy-eyed not to get this one Who's this ? Easy Scale 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Good Morning twinkeee!! Yes, a pre-platinum Dorothy Malone

James Garner ?

Nice guess, but no. Not Donna Reed. Her film career began in 1943. She won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress in a 1956 film. Her film career peaked in the early 1960's so she went into television on a short-lived, popular soap based on a famous film.

Could it be Canadian customer's (only) have this problem? My U.S. page still has it available for download.

Who's this?

Of Course!! A favorite of yours, I suspect.

> {quote:title=lzcutter wrote:}{quote} > > If this helps to open up some of the goodies that the AFI holds the rights to, we might all end up being happier than we are now. > Thank you. That would make this very much worthwhile.

Who's this? Easy Scale 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

HA! Now there's a guy who knows his puppets. Thanks, Rich.

> {quote:title=FredCDobbs wrote:}{quote}Gertrude Astor > > Amazing. I never heard of her before. > You're welcome

What the..? This is almost one of the last films I'd expect to see on TCM at this time. Not only is it a film that is a mere 12 years of age, it has absolutely nothing to recommend it's placement at such an early stage in it's miserable life. I have seen this film and all I can say is The New York Times review is right on the money. An amusing note: the Times page containing the review has a short list of 'similar movies' which are so far removed from this 'thing' that I find it hard to believe the person who compiled that list has a dictionary containing the word 'similar'. These are: *The Haunting*, *Poltergeist*, *Rosemary's Baby*, *The Uninvited*, *The Sixth Sense*. With the possible exception of *The Sixth Sense*, which may be considered slow and boring, but in a determined and purposeful manner integral to the presentation, *What Lies Beneath* has no business being mentioned in the same breath as these. In all fairness, I'm not against this film being shown by TCM, afterall, many poor examples from all eras are available and shown from time to time so this 'thing' has it's place here, just not, IMO, now. There's nothing that makes this special enough to be brought to the fore in this manner. http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9506E1DE163AF932A15754C0A9669C8B63

.