-
Posts
16,822 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Posts posted by Kid Dabb
-
-
Could it be Canadian customer's (only) have this problem? My U.S. page still
has it available for download.
-
Who's this?

-
Of Course!! A favorite of yours, I suspect.
-
> {quote:title=lzcutter wrote:}{quote}
>
> If this helps to open up some of the goodies that the AFI holds the rights to, we might all end up being happier than we are now.
>
Thank you. That would make this very much worthwhile.
-
Who's this? Easy Scale 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

-
HA! Now there's a guy who knows his puppets. Thanks, Rich.
-
> {quote:title=FredCDobbs wrote:}{quote}Gertrude Astor
>
> Amazing. I never heard of her before.

>
You're welcome

-
What the..?
This is almost one of the last films I'd expect to see on TCM at this time.
Not only is it a film that is a mere 12 years of age, it has absolutely nothing
to recommend it's placement at such an early stage in it's miserable life. I have
seen this film and all I can say is The New York Times review is right on the
money. An amusing note: the Times page containing the review has a short list
of 'similar movies' which are so far removed from this 'thing' that I find it hard
to believe the person who compiled that list has a dictionary containing the word
'similar'. These are: *The Haunting*, *Poltergeist*, *Rosemary's Baby*, *The Uninvited*,
*The Sixth Sense*. With the possible exception of *The Sixth Sense*, which may be
considered slow and boring, but in a determined and purposeful manner integral
to the presentation, *What Lies Beneath* has no business being mentioned in the
same breath as these.
In all fairness, I'm not against this film being shown by TCM, afterall, many poor
examples from all eras are available and shown from time to time so this 'thing' has
it's place here, just not, IMO, now. There's nothing that makes this special enough to
be brought to the fore in this manner.
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9506E1DE163AF932A15754C0A9669C8B63
-
-
Not in the script
-
*219*
I'm so terribly sorry Shirley. But, as you can plainly see, there are onlyseven steps. We'll try to make room for you next year. Is that alright? -
Not Ed Begley. Better looking (sorry Ed) - but still not leading man looks.
This photo looks so unlike him, I'm gonna give you more..

-
not ethel
She began her career playing trombone on a riverboat. Between 1915 and 1962she appeared in over 250 movies. She was a tall woman, often towering over herleading men. This led to being utilized in comedy roles as aristocrats, golddiggersand 'best pal' to leading ladies. -
Not Leonard or Robert. This actor is a bit earlier and this photo shows him
so young, I almost didn't recognize him. He actually looks like a 'dummy'
puppet, similar to the one in a Twilight Zone episode. Freaky. He's a very
well known supporting actor - husky build.
-
They're all actors with at least one film credit
-
*M A S H (1970)* , I think
-
I think it was first used in the films
*Ulysses (1967)* and *I'll Never Forget What's'isname (1967)*.
-
I'm not using this APP, so I'm as much in the dark as you are. Sometimes they
pull these things to work on them and slip 'em back in at some later date.
Possibly, you could download iTunes on another site and try the APP again here.
-
Thank you, flash.
{font:Arial}{size:small}"I would have thought that medical science would have had the problem of death all sorted out. I was sure that by the time I reached the age I am now, they would have found a cure for it, that they would be able to transplant everything and we'd all just keep right on going forever."{font}
-
Who's this? Easy Scale 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (1 impossible - 10 piece of cake)

-
DING ! DING ! DING !
Yes, Jean Arthur. Nice pick, twinkeee
-
Let's try this again

-
I saw the doctor this morning. She says my eyes are gonna be just fine, I just have
to stay away from this pla.. OH NO!!
-
Dang! Quick everybody, cover your eyes! Oh, the humanity..

Who's this?
in Games and Trivia
Posted
Nice guess, but no. Not Donna Reed.
Her film career began in 1943. She won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress in a 1956 film. Her film career peaked in the early 1960's so she went into television on a short-lived, popular soap based on a famous film.