Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

kingrat

Members
  • Posts

    4,574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by kingrat

  1. I have to agree with Jonny about Steiger in IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT. Imagine the sheriff as played by Gene Hackman, as it might have been had it been made a couple of years later. Would Hackman have relied on so much gum chewing? So Jonny, when are you starting the "10 STUPIDEST Wins for Best Actor" thread?

     

    Some actors who are good in supporting roles--Steiger in ON THE WATERFRONT and even DOCTOR ZHIVAGO--cannot really carry a film in a leading role.

     

    Has anyone else ever noticed that at some point in his career Brando stopped being able to act with other actors? In THE GODFATHER, BURN! and APOCALYPSE NOW, for instance, most of Brando's scenes are filmed with him alone in the shot. He does bits of business alone, but has minimal interaction with other characters. This may be a result of Brando's wanting to spend as few days filming as possible, but to my mind it seriously weakens his performances.

  2. Holly, you're absolutely right about the impact of Julie Christie in DARLING. Some people had seen her in Schlesinger's earlier film BILLY LIAR, where she played a small but crucial role, but in America BILLY LIAR played primarily in art houses. DARLING was much more widely seen, and then when DOCTOR ZHIVAGO also was released in 1965, she went from unknown to top star. DARLING stood for the discovery of a fascinating new star, for swinging London (you can't imagine how "in" it was to be British in those years), and for a new sexual frankness in cinema.

     

    Jackie, I hope you get to see the end of the movie eventually. You'll get to see another big scene for Bogarde before the fadeout.

     

    Julie Christie does have a fascinating face with a mysterious quality. It's all too believable that Bogarde would give up everything for her. What's especially nice is that Christie conveys the sense that Diana doesn't quite understand how she effects men.

  3. I don't believe anyone has mentioned MANHATTA (1920), the beautiful film about 10 minutes long that was recently shown on TCM. The painter Charles Sheeler, noted for his use of industrial buildings as subjects for his paintings, co-directed with Paul Strand. The film, suggested by a Walt Whitman poem, has documentary interest with its glimpses of 1920 Manhattan, and the painter's eye gives us some dazzling images. MANHATTA has been lovingly restored, and TCM is one of the parties mentioned in the credits for the restoration. If TCM shows this film again, and I hope they will, please give it ten minutes of your time.

  4. John Schlesinger's DARLING (1965) will be shown tonight at midnight EST. When first released, it made Julie Christie a star and because it dealt more frankly with sex than almost all American films of the time did, it became an icon of "swinging London."

     

    As far as I know, DARLING is the first film whose attitudes toward homosexuality could come from the world of 2010. The main gay character, Malcolm, who's a confidante of fashion model Diana (Christie), is neither better nor worse than any of the other characters in the film. His sexual orientation isn't a scandal, a sin, or a problem. It just is. He flirts with a good-looking Italian waiter and later rides off with him on a motorcycle. Again, this may be a first. In the Capri sequence, we see a man who's walking with a woman but turns around to gaze at another man. This has nothing to do with the story, but Schlesinger obviously wants to include this. A "man on the street" interview features a man who says the thing he's most ashamed of in England is all the homosexuals in London. The viewer is encouraged to regard this person as a fool. Although there are gay men in the scenes of debauchery in Paris, again they are not portrayed as any better of worse than the straight characters present.

     

    The other really remarkable feature of the film to me is Dirk Bogarde's portrayal of a TV interviewer who leaves his family for the young and beautiful Julie Christie. We don't see the impact on his family, but we do see the impact on himself. There's no moralizing, only an honest, unsparing look at what happens, and this couldn't be more moral. Bogarde won the BAFTA (British Oscar), deservedly so.

  5. I'm with you, libradoll. As Mr. 6666 commented in the Midlife Crisis thread, "A script wouldn't hurt." However, the film does have its passionate admirers, who are usually men from the large cities of the Northeast or Midwest.

  6. The combination of Rainer, Garbo, Stanwyck, and Dunne in the same Oscar field gives us an interesting mix of acting styles. Stanwyck and Dunne are great sound era actresses, with good voices, attention to verbal nuance, the ability to listen and react convincingly, comic timing, and the chops to do the big emotional scenes. Garbo adapts her silent era style to talkies. She knows exactly how to project a remote beauty, how to be one of the most glorious subjects a movie camera could hope to find.

     

    I'm not familiar with the Austrian and German stage traditions Rainer would have known or with how much silent era acting she did, but her work in THE GOOD EARTH feels like silent star acting. She hits one emotion strongly in each scene, like the serious version of Marion Davies' different faces in the handkerchief scene in SHOW PEOPLE. Arguably, this technique fits for playing a Chinese peasant, where you wouldn't want the nuances appropriate for an urban heroine like the ones characteristically played by Stanwyck and Dunne--or would you?

  7. Clore, I share some of your reservations about Billy Wilder's THE PRIVATE LIFE OF SHERLOCK HOLMES, but would love for some of the film's champions to write about it. To me the real stars are Miklos Rosza for his glorious music and Christopher Challis for the beautiful cinematography. The acting is good, but the combination of leisurely pacing and low star wattage doesn't work to the film's advantage. Would the additional 40 minutes cut from the film really make it a better film?

     

    As with many directors, Wilder's earlier work is tauter, and the closest comparison in genre is WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION, which has more forward momentum. I do like THE PRIVATE LIFE OF SHERLOCK HOLMES, a very amiable film, with Colin Blakely a charming Watson. Robert Stephens is a fine ensemble actor, but shouldn't Holmes stand out more? Holmes and Watson seem more like equals, which has both pluses and minuses. Wilder's first choices for Holmes and Watson, Peter O'Toole and Peter Sellers, could have been much better or much worse, if O'Toole had been allowed to ham it up and if Sellers had been given the kind of free rein he had in LOLITA.

     

    Some viewers see THE PRIVATE LIFE OF SHERLOCK HOLMES as being a very personal film for Wilder, and I'd love to see someone explain, because to me that's not apparent.

  8. Sidney Poitier for the Dennis Haysbert role is an easy choice. Most gay/bi actors would have shied away from the Dennis Quaid role, but it's intriguing to wonder if Rock Hudson could have relaxed enough to play the husband. Let's cast the husband against type: Jeff Chandler. So who does the Julianne Moore role?

  9. But Jonny, if you shut down the thread we'll miss the sweetness and light you unfailingly provide! And I was wondering if someone would say something tacky about Diane Keaton in ANNIE HALL (like I didn't luv luv luv her as much as Woody thought we oughta), though she also starred in LOOKING FOR MR. GOODBAR that year, so her award was partly for that. For the Best Actor thread someone (well, one person, anyway) might nominate Brando in THE GODFATHER (gasp!) as one of the worst choices, though he had weak competition and Al Pacino got dumped into the supporting category. For worst Best Pictures, BRAVEHEART was much weaker than its four rivals: APOLLO 13, BABE, IL POSTINO, SENSE AND SENSIBILITY. On the other hand, BRAVEHEART was almost as historically accurate as THEY DIED WITH THEIR BOOTS ON, and Mel Gibson did have the worst haircut in the history of cinema, so it had something going for it.

     

    On a more positive and uplifting note, I also have enjoyed Danny Peary's ALTERNATE OSCARS, and it's fun to argue with his choices.

  10. I must have enjoyed the December programming because I now have a big backlog of tapes to watch. Most posters have really appreciated the Bogart tribute and the Capra retrospective.

     

    Though I usually prefer for TCM not to show relatively recent films, I'm going to have to turn in my Grinch button and say a few kind words about FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL, which did receive an Oscar nomination for Best Picture. To me, it's funnier than many golden age comedies, and less contrived than almost all of them. Many TCM viewers will recognize that Hugh Grant's comic delivery--the hesitations, the pauses, the stammerings--is based on James Stewart's performing style.

     

    As for DOCTOR ZHIVAGO and CHARIOTS OF FIRE, I'd say a few kind words about them, too. Where's that Grinch button???

  11. For many years, the Best Supporting Actor award always went to an older actor who'd never won an Oscar: Jack Albertson, Don Ameche, George Burns, etc. Kevin Kline's win for A Fish Called Wanda broke the spell. This still happens occasionally, as with Morgan Freeman.

     

    Timing and momentum matter if you're trying to mount an Oscar campaign against an obvious frontrunner. Shakespeare in Love and Crash timed their runs for Best Picture just right.

     

    Timing also means everything for Best Actor and Actress. Try to be nominated against people who've already won or who aren't well known yet. Case in point: in 1940 Joan Fontaine was still a newcomer, Katharine Hepburn had won an Oscar, and Bette Davis had won two. Perfect timing for Ginger Rogers to win for Kitty Foyle.

     

    In general, female newcomers (Audrey Hepburn, for instance) had a better shot at Best Actress than male newcomers (Peter O'Toole) at Best Actor.

     

    Your chances for an acting award increase if you appear in a picture that gets lots of nominations.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...