ValentineXavier

> {quote:title=OldIsImmortal wrote:}{quote} > But there is also bad news here for *you* in this, Valentine. SS shortly thereafter told me (privately, of course, of course) that she was seeking to eliminate from this discussion forum those who were pressing too aggressively for TCM to make available at its web site a three month schedule, rather than *releasing schedules for any future months through unnamed sources, as is currently being done!* Except for the hole that goes in one ear, and out the other, your head must be 100% bone. As I, and others have repeatedly told you, there are no "unnamed sources." Anyone who had an old link, or has since used a newer one, can simply change the number of the month in the web address, and get succeeding months. And, I'm not boneheaded enough to believe that the posts were deleted because they don't want requests to restore links to printable full month schedules for future months.

I guess that makes you a shrinking violet... well, maybe not.

Yeah, I think I saw that one on PBS. But, it is good, and not well-known, so sure, it would be a good one to show.

Interesting. You might be right.

Yep, Mae was always very much in control, and her own woman.

How dare you dislike Brando! Hope that was lighthearted enough... I'd like to see *MotB* with Charles Laughton as Bligh, and Brando as Fletcher Christian. Perhaps a computer generated version, some day...

There was a good laser disc set, The Cartoons that Time Forgot, that had Flip, and Ub. I think it might be on DVD. I keep meaning to transfer my LD to DVD. One of these days...

> {quote:title=finance wrote:}{quote} > Mason only takes murder cases, especially those in which the real killer has a good chance of confessing in the witness chair. Actually, Perry practiced criminal law, and we often see him take cases that aren't murder cases, at least at the beginning. He even took up a few probate/inheritance cases. But, I don't recall any class action suits for misrepresentation.

I haven't had any TCM volume problems. If you have cable, I'd bet it's something wrong at the local head-end.

> {quote:title=stjohnrv wrote:}{quote} > THE DUKE as Genghis Khan in the Conqueror did it produce wonderful results I don't know, but it definitely produces wonderfully hilarious results. Does that count? That would be blunderful results...

Obviously some major expunging, here, and on the similar thread. Looks like Oldis, isn't, any more. Since it was deleted, and this is the appropriate thread, I will repeat - TCM, please reinstall the links to the full month print outs for the two coming months, that were on the old site. If one knows the addresses, (posted below,) they are still accessible. So, why no links on the TCM home page? Please fix this!

I certainly don't find those details about Kate annoying. Thanks for posting them.

> I wish I knew how to do that trick quote-in-a-white-rectangle thing. Well, I will have to struggle the best I can. Just begin the line with > Good observations about Lewton and *Cat People*. I should have specifically stated in my previous post that I quite agree with you, about it being an "Essential." That was the point of my definition of what is an essential film, but I neglected to make it clear I meant to back you up. Sorry.

I thought he said "I'll be Bach," because he wanted to play a great composer.

Where was Balder? And, if you didn't stay until the very end of the credits, you missed something important.

> {quote:title=mongo wrote:}{quote} > John Wayne having lunch with cast and crew on location for "Forth Apache" Are you sure that's not from "Fifth Apache?"

> {quote:title=bwande wrote:}{quote} > Well that Rates a 10 in " Makes no Sense " Category. Hanoi Jane is a Traitor to Our Country and that is why I refuse to watch anything she is in. > > Not sure if you had a point out side of Pure Confusion. Yet another Tool. Just trying to induce cognitive dissonance, wherever I can. To me what you said before, and above, makes no sense.

Wasn't MOMA doing a retrospective, using that very film, at the time? I was hoping that had something to do with it, and that it would be rescheduled, but LZ is probably right. Still, we can keep our fingers crossed.

It's called "Other Cinema," and his website is www.othercinema.com. Click on Schedule, for venue and films. Edited by: ValentineXavier on May 21, 2011 11:19 PM

> {quote:title=cigarjoe wrote:}{quote} > > *Where Danger Lives* (1950) Atmospheric, stylized not a bad Noir though Domergue doesn?t quite gel in the part . 7/10 I can understand why people think that, but I think she worked quite well. She is psychotic. As a psychotic, she is always a little distant, always not quite 'there,' other-directed, and we can't see 'the other.' She may have come across that way because of limited acting skills, but I think it worked, for the part.

Pardon me for being a geography stickler, but Mexico is part of North America, as is Canada. Still, I take your point.

> {quote:title=stjohnrv wrote:}{quote} > , Gordon was by all accounts somewhat of a *marinette*, a stickler for rules and formality, a harsh disciplinarian, I rarely correct people's misspellings, but lest some misunderstand an otherwise good post, I will point out that the word you want is "martinet." A "marionette" is a puppet.

Well, the king of found footage is Craig Baldwin, in SF. He has an alternative/exp. movie theater there. He helps experimental filmmakers find just the right found footage for use in their films. He is also a filmmaker, who made my favorite experimental film, *Tribulation 99, Alien Anomalies Under America*, entirely from found footage.

Thanks, Ray. Hmm - contrast, China, or color, they are all "C" girls! Fred, I think I may have seen the green-eyed, red haired girl somewhere, possibly on some test signals I had on Laser Disc.

It's all a conspiracy between publishers and filmmakers. If "historical" films really were accurate, people would just watch the films, and never read the books.