Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

ValentineXavier

Members
  • Posts

    6,917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by ValentineXavier

  1. > {quote:title=Ascotrudgeracer wrote:}{quote}

    > I regret starting this thread.

    > But there is something about the rehab industry, the prices they charge, the failure rate (always blaming the patient, not their treatments) and people always looking for "supports" rather than being independent and SELF-reliant, that is irritating to me.

    >

    > Since no one here agrees with me, I will admit I am wrong, as usual, and I apologize sincerely to anyone I have offended.

     

     

    I'm not offended. I also accept that the rehab biz, especially for 'stars,' might be a bit of a racket. But, I don't think most people who have a drug or alcohol problem can defeat it by themselves. If they had that much strength of will, they probably wouldn't become dependent in the first place. Stars with such problems are naturally going to seek out very posh rehab facilities, and are going to get charged for all the amenities. Of course, whether such a facility does provide good quality professional help is another question, one I can't answer.

     

    Your statement above seems to be a bit conflicted. You say that the rehab places always blame their failures on the patient. Then, you say that the patient should be "independent and self-reliant," meaning they don't need a rehab place. Perhaps some rehab attempts do fail, due to poor service by the rehab place. But surely, a patient must want to be rehabilitated, in order to be successful. I don't exactly follow stars with these sorts of problems. But, I do read the news, and see such an article from time to time. It seems to me that some of them don't really want to reform, but just go through the motions, for the public, their mates, the courts, etc. I'm not sure it is appropriate to blame a rehab facility for their failures.

  2. I'm definitely an Ella fan. I like the sort of character she usually plays. She is quite, calm, purposeful, and yes, determined. She overcomes the obstacles, and does whatever she commits herself to, which is usually be supportive to someone who needs help. And, of course she is good looking, too. I don't find her voice, or her acting, to be "flat." True, she's not flamboyant, but that's nice for a change, because she really has a spine, even if she's quiet about it.

  3. > {quote:title=FredCDobbs wrote:}{quote}

    > This is the worlds first My Space revolution. It started last week with some My Space postings about street demonstrations.

     

    Well, it actually started in Tunisia, when a young out-of-work professional who had opened a food cart set himself on fire, to protest the Tunisian gov. closing his food cart. Where it will end, who can say? I only hope it spurs the Iranians to take back their government from the Guardian Council, the mullahs, the Revolutionary Guard, and the Basij thugs.

  4. > {quote:title=Arturo wrote:}{quote}

    > Yes, but there is no history of people with this preference in rice getting persecuted, treated as second class citizens, etc.

     

    I can tell you've never lived in a student co-op. Some would persecute you for serving brown rice, other co-ops would persecute you for serving white rice.

     

    Seriously, though, point taken.

  5. I looked it up on the IMDb. I don't know why you call it "lost." True, it isn't available on DVD or VHS, but that doesn't make it lost. Several people describe having seen it in recent years. Given its 1.37:1 aspect ratio, and the cast, I suspect it was made for TV, but was deemed good enough to get a theatrical release. Director Joseph Pevney directed both movies, and TV, including the original Star Trek. It does sound like an interesting film, but there are LOTS of great films that haven't made it to DVD, or even VHS.

     

    There is a film made the same year, *Night Tide*, that was considered lost for years, since there was a fire in the lab, that destroyed most prints. But, one was found, and now it's on DVD.

  6. > {quote:title=hamradio wrote:}{quote}

    > I wish they stop referring to the 1.85 : 1 ratio as letterbox. Its only wide framing lines between frames within the film itself. This causes confusion for CinemaScope that is true widescreen that is letterbox.

    >

    > On some TV sets the 1.85 is barely noticeable such as "The Nightmare Before Christmas"

     

     

    1.85:1 is considered a wide screen aspect ratio. Shown on a 4x3 TV, you will definitely see the black bars on the top and the bottom. Unfortunately, 1.85 is often rendered as 1.78:1 on TV, and DVD (even Criterion has done this.)

     

    If it is truly shown as 1.85:1 on a 1.78:1 (16x9) TV, you will see thin slivers of black on the top and bottom of your screen, but only if your overscan is adjusted to a minimum. 5% overscan isn't uncommon on TVs, so even if the true 1.85:1 aspect ratio is maintained, you might not see any black strips.

     

    Of course with a film in the aspect ratio of 2.35:1, commonly called Cinemascope, or 'Scope, you will definitely see the black bars top and bottom, even on a 16x9 TV.

     

    TCM uses the same "letterboxed" card on the SD channel, and the HD channel. Perhaps when they go to true HD, they will only display the "letterboxed" card when showing 2.35:1 films.

  7. > {quote:title=EgbertSouse wrote:}{quote}

    > The e on my kyboard works intrmittently.

     

    Good comeback!

     

    Since no one has yet given you a straight answer, yes, I agree that was a really dumb mistake. Someone else noticed it a while back, and posted about it. TCM does make these slip ups from time to time.

  8. > {quote:title=moviesrgr8 wrote:}{quote}

    > Gaffe is spelled like this

     

    Of course it is, unless your name is "Souse," pronounced soo-say. So, "gaffe" would then be gaa-fay... :)

     

    Or, perhaps he thought TCM had speared a fish.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...