Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

ValentineXavier

Members
  • Posts

    6,917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by ValentineXavier

  1. > {quote:title=ginnyfan wrote:}{quote}I used to love when the Seaview hit something or got hit with something. Shake the camera and have the entire crew fall in the same direction.

     

    That was on when I was in HS. My friend who watched it with me, and I used to joke that they bounced around so much that they should have padded the interior of the control room. We also joked that one day, the ship would break in two, and be the "Sea," and the "View."

  2. Well, yes, I remember it. I was a hardcore sci fi fan, and thought it was awfully lame. Actually, the vast majority of TV sci fi offerings over the years have been awfully lame, or just plain awful. Same goes for sci fi films. But, I don't begrudge your attraction to James Darren... :)

  3. Well I do know that. I also know that Avery hated Screwball Squirrel! I liked him well enough, though. Probably Droopy and Wolfie were my Avery favorites, from his MGM days. I have The Compleat Tex Avery collection on LD. It has all of his MGM stuff. I transferred it to DVD. I doubt it will ever get a DVD release. Pretty much every toon contains something we find offensive these days.

  4. You got it. Also, I thought it would be sufficiently intense to hold their attention. Actually, *Sanjuro* is more violent, but it's perhaps not as intense, since it is in a sort of different world, i.e. different culture and era.

     

    Edited by: ValentineXavier on Jun 4, 2012 12:45 AM

  5. I agree! It was a perfect ending, for that film. I don't recall where I read it, probably on the IMDb, or maybe the wikipedia, but people have come up with a very logical explanation for all the seemingly impossible happenings in the film. It was very interesting, and very plausible.

  6. > {quote:title=Dargo2 wrote:}{quote}You guys WERE kidding with those picks here, RIGHT?! ;-)

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > (...especially you, clore)

    >

     

    Well, I thought Clore must be kidding, but I wasn't sure. I was NOT kidding. I think the films I listed are all good films, that I would show to kids.

  7. > {quote:title=FredCDobbs wrote:}{quote}

    > I like parts of this movie but not other parts. I don't like Gene Tierney crawling around in the dirt.

     

    I'll admit that if I somehow came upon Gene rolling around in the dirt like that in my yard, or in a park or something, I would find it weirdly amusing. But, in the context of this film, it is ridiculous and insulting.

  8. I've seen a number of films listed here as having "bad endings" that I think have great endings. :( Oh, well.

     

    I did find the end of *No Country for Old Men* to be most unsatisfying. I'm not a particular fan of happy endings, but I did want to see Javier Bardem get squashed like a bug...

     

    My all-time worst ending, to what otherwise would have been a fine neo-noir, is 1987's *Angel Heart*. Sure, I noticed the foreshadowing, but hoped it was just a distraction. To find out 'the Devil made me do it?' Really? Ugh!

  9. > {quote:title=TomJH wrote:}{quote}When I was a kid I recall being confused by Alan Hale Sr. and Alan Hale Jr.. Not exactly being the Einstein of my neighbourhood, I used to think they were the same person, but was always confused that it seemed to be in the more recently made films that he looked YOUNGER.

    >

     

    Well, you can hardly be blamed for that. That Sr. and Jr. pair are the most alike I've ever seen. I vaguely remember wondering how Alan Hale had gotten younger, the first time I saw Jr.

  10. > {quote:title=MovieProfessor wrote:}{quote} And, the one we should get to know, “Rick Deckard” is more or less, simply two dimensional and what’s missing is a dynamic posture that should have been as classic and worthy as “Sam Spade,” “Philip Marlowe,” “Mike Hammer” and maybe even “Nick Charles.”

    >

     

    While I think Deckard is more than two-dimensional, yes, there is something missing. That is because he is a Replicant, and has probably only been alive for a few years. His personal history is programmed into him. That can't completely substitute for a real life of a few decades. This is a necessary and important aspect of his character in the film.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...