[Is this site sllllooooowwwww tonight? Or is it just me?]

I have had a cold. . . .stand back. . . .chooo!

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

Looks like you got her.

 

While we wait for official confirmation:

 

[Is this site sllllooooowwwww tonight? Or is it just me?]

Seems like it's taking foooreeever to navigate the pages.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

Julie Andrews.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

You have the system down, man. I imagined it was a photo from a pre-film career, it looked vaudvillian to me.

[An evening of Wheeler & Woolsey on October 14th]

TCM has spotlighted this funny and forgotten comedy duo before. And it's just fine they're doing it again. Two films they're in I like are Dixiana and Rio Rita.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

Hey that's right! Congrats, Dobbs!

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

That's her!

 

And him?:

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

 

Here's a fine lady:

 

 

[hiding nuns movie]

i think Mr. Dobbs meant that you can google "Conspiracy of Hearts" to see if any pics come up that resemble the movie you have in mind.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

But. . . .but. . . .that's not his upper lip!

[31 Days Oversights-I Say Vertigo]

From the way I've seen Hitchcock's creative process described, you can be confident that the film you see is the film he intended it to be. Aside from the tacked-on ending for the European Vertigo discussed here, the only other instance I know of Hitchcock accepted anything he didn't plan for a movie was a similar tacked-on ending for Psycho, where we get the internal monologue of Norman Bates, which he considered superfluous. We have seen on TCM Hitchcock himself describing how he used source material. He read it for plot elements, and characters. Then he went ahead and did what he wanted to. That's why it's not necessary to worry much about the source, even if Hitchcock lifted directly from it, he wouldn't have done so if it didn't conform to his vision. A good way to see how he worked is to read Cornell Woolrich's Rear Window, and compare it to the movie. Woolrich's story is a straightforward thriller. Hitchcock adds romance, the sub plots, and the voyeurism elements.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

Hey Kidd_Dabb, was I right? Is this Eddy Foy, Jr.?:

 

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

Is it? This is what I get from the source of the pic:

The dog's name is in quotes, so I can't be cretain.

Here's the site:

 

http://www.playbill.com/news/article/94590-Leapin-Lizards-Annie-Is-Back-on-Tour-With-a-Fresh-Approach-and-a-New-Song

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

>LiamCasey:

>I sure as heck don't know who is playing Sandy!

 

Oh, c'mon, guess!

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

No, the dog! the dog!:

 

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

Yup. Obvious. twinkeee!

[31 Days Oversights-I Say Vertigo]

Based on how Hitchcock said he used his source material, you can depend on anything in the movie as part of his creation, whether it's in the source or not, and it can be discussed with reference to his intentions.

[Ice cold in Alex]

Thank you. I like it, too.

[31 Days Oversights-I Say Vertigo]

And I believed him when he said it, which is why I felt so betrayed when it turned out he actually could make it up.

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

 

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize this was the obvious thread.

 

Darn, I just realized I did post an obvious pic

 

Edited by: slaytonf on Feb 24, 2013 7:18 PM

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face. Whose is it?]

Eddie Foy, Jr.

 

Kidd_Dabb must be indisposed.

 

Topic: The chicken or the egg, the canopener or the can--evidence of a universal principle? Discuss.

 

Edited by: slaytonf on Feb 24, 2013 10:40 PM

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

The pitch is low and outside. Ripken swings anyway. A sizziling grounder to Morgan's off side. He goes horizontal and snags it with three fingers!! There is pandemonium in the stadium!!

[Ice cold in Alex]

Doesn't seem to. Here's a link to IMDB:

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053935/?ref_=sr_1

 

And Wikipedia:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Cold_in_Alex

[Oh, that face, that fabulous face II - Post 1950's. Whose is it?]

Not neither of them. She's european.