Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Bogie56

Members
  • Posts

    37,501
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    165

Posts posted by Bogie56

  1. MV5BNzVjOTk2NDMtYWQyNi00MmJlLWIzYjEtYWI3

    On page 310 of this thread I posted about seeing La Otre a 1946 Mexican noir starring Dolores Del Rio.  I wasn't long into it when I had the feeling that this would make a good Bette Davis film.  It then twigged that this was indeed remade with Bette Davis as Dead Ringer (1964).

    Stolen-Life-1939-film-images-51250ec2-88

    Last night at the BFI Southbank I saw Stolen Life (1939) by Paul Czinner for British Paramount Pictures.  It stars Elisabeth Bergner and Michael Redgrave.  This is another twin sister film that was remade with Bette Davis.  In this case as A Stolen Life (1946).

    The Bergner/Redgrave original was an enjoyable melodrama.  No more no less.   The BFI screens at least one film a month from their archive that cannot be found on dvd or television.  The curator pointed out that this film is ripe for restoration (the print was excellent) but the fly in the ointment is Paramount who want a fortune for the rights to do so.  As most collectors know good copies of early Paramount films are very hard to come by.  I saw another Bergner/Czinner film at Southbank a few years ago called Escape Me Never (1935) for which Bergner garnered an Oscar nomination.  That was later remade with Errol Flynn.  Again, the film print that was screened was really good but any copy that I have seen on the internet is barely watchable.

    • Like 3
  2. 1 hour ago, Gershwin fan said:

    A movie with a strong anti-war, pro-peace theme. I doubt that would go over much better with our evangelical friend.

    Sure but the xenophobe made the case that Parasite was an example of a recent descent into liberalism.

    As you well know, but so and so is in denial about, people who go into the arts are usually liberal and interested in fighting for unjust causes.  The main reason for this is because they have had a good education.   

  3. Wednesday, February 12

    TO+BE+BENNY.png

    8 p.m.  To Be or Not to Be (1942).   When Paul Gross of Due South fame played Hamlet at Stratford Ontario I was sorely tempted to take a middle seat and like Robert Stack get up at the start of his soliloquy and slowly and painfully exit the theatre.  In in the end I was perhaps too cheap to fork out for a ticket.  I love the prompter gag too.

    • Like 2
  4. 7 hours ago, misswonderly3 said:

    Right, I was thinking of all those credits at the end of a movie nowadays too.  "Credit bloat", I like that.  My husband always jokes that they now have credits for the people who made the sandwiches and coffee. And I think they do.

    Yes, the caterers are usually credited well above the post sound people.

  5. 19 minutes ago, NipkowDisc said:

    this is what they like to do...

    gat handed a statuette and then engage in exhibitions of exaggerated self-importance.

    joaquin tells us not to drink milk because cows are exploited.

    what a dip****.

     

    I thought he was speaking directly to you Nipkowdisc.  Respecting animals and all.  :lol:

    • Haha 1
  6. 48 minutes ago, Gershwin fan said:

    More specifically, I think he dislikes it because it was directed by an east asian and the film is seen as seen as having left wing, anti-capitalism themes.

    Did he get that far to even learn what it was about?  I rather doubt it.

  7. 1 hour ago, speedracer5 said:

    I agree that we didn't need an environmentalism speech at that time.  It is to be expected however since Joaquin made it a point to use his  journey through this year's awards circuit to use these various events as a platform for him to make his soapbox speeches.  He also said that as a way to help the environment, he was re-wearing the same tuxedo--which really is fine. Would anyone notice if a man was wearing a different black tuxedo than the one he wore previously? 

    I really don't need celebrities using their speeches to send any sort of message.  I was pleasantly surprised that for the most part, there was very little DC politics mentioned--just a few comments sprinkled throughout.   That was refreshing. 

    I didn't need Renee to name drop all the famous historical figures that she could think of off the top of her head.  If  she could have edited that part out and related it all directly to Judy Garland, who is an important figure in her own right, it would have been better.  After all, Judy is the reason she's there in the first place.

    You should have heard Renee's speech at the BAFTAs !   Talk about incoherent babble.  She did rather well at the Oscars in comparison.

    Personally I really disliked her performance altogether and thought it rather 'obvious' that people would find it award worthy.

  8. 11 hours ago, JakeHolman said:

    i won't give it the time of day ... 

    Which makes you an expert on how good it is?   

    A typical ugly American response.  Nothing outside the borders of the good ole USA  is worth anything.  Thankfully not every neck in America is so red.

    • Like 4
  9. 6 minutes ago, LornaHansonForbes said:

    I get the feeling that, as with JOHN HUSTON, the LESS I KNOW ABOUT JOHN FORD, the better. He made some terrific, timeless and very honest movies, but in real life...I think he was very likely a horrible, horrible person.

    Maybe so but he was well liked and admired by most who worked with him.  I didn't come away with a bad impression of him after reading McBride's great book but he defiantly hardened as he got older.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...