Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Sepiatone

Members
  • Posts

    23,768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by Sepiatone

  1. 21 hours ago, fxreyman said:

    Well, I would not go that far...

    But a good story told well, even with some violence can be tolerated. One example I would give is The Untouchables. Yes, a violent film, but not mean spirited as I thought the Godfather movies were.

    Odd....

    I've heard several people who also disliked THE GOTHFATHER give a variety of reasons why, but never knew anybody who felt it(and the sequel) was"mean spirited".

    18 hours ago, danmc757 said:

    Everyone seems to like Ferris Bueller's Day Off.  Cannot stand it!!!  

    Yeah, I thought it was OK, but not "great".  Some day I might be in a mood to watch it a second time.  Not high on my list either.  I too don't understand the "cult" status.

    Sepiatone

  2. 22 minutes ago, fxreyman said:

    Here it goes...

    The Godfather. I am not a fan of Marlon Brando. There. I said it!!!

    Many believe he was our greatest actor. I never felt that way. And if I have to see another clip of him yelling “Stella!” from A Streetcar Named Desire, I think I am going to puke. They could have told the film in a much less violent way. I understand that filmmaking in the early 1970’s seemed to be going the way of showcasing lots and lots of violence, but I am sure that they could have been able to show less and the story could have been better. From my understanding it was the studio which wanted a more violent visual style. Coppola wanted a more talky, drama-laden version.

    The Godfather, Part II. Not too bad, just don’t like De Niro all that much. Pacino is fine, but ultimately I am not a fan of the intercutting between the two time periods.

     

    Hmmmmm.....

    Prefer "sugar coating" violence, eh?  Dislike that honest approach to it, eh?

    Perhaps THIS is one gangster flick that won't upset your poor, widdle sensibilities?  ;) 

    Sepiatone

  3. I'm surprised it's ME, and not ARITOSTHENES that's posting the mention of "Madam" Angie Dickinson's 90th birthday today! 

    And that I did so without referring to her in one of her movie character's names.  ;) 

    But have a happy, Angie.  And many more to you.  :)

    Sepiatone

  4. 10 hours ago, TomJH said:

    Blow Up (1966)

    What the . . .

    The last time I was this confused was when I had to take a calculus test without the assistance of the class math genius, a friend, having completed the test and leaving his answers on full display on his desk beside me.

    As an avid photographer, I thought I'd like BLOW UP more than I did.   But the movie didn't confuse me as much as it did frustrate me.  No sooner do you get the impression it's going somewhere, it  sits down.  So I can get where you're coming from Tom.  :) 

    Sepiatone

    • Like 1
  5. "Blandings" holds up for me I guess because  not only did I read the book as well( and it's one of the few movies "as good as the book".  but my daughter also went through the ordeal of having a house built and went through her own pitfalls of construction problems.  Not as many as Blandings, but certainly more expensive.  ;)  But the newest version of the "fixer-upper" type movie, Tom Hanks' THE MONEY PIT ('86) was, despite being entertaining, so over the top and far fetched it hasn't had any subsequent re-viewings by me.   GEORGE WASHINGTON SLEPT HERE is a childhood favorite, so still gets a look by me when it gets shown, and THE EGG AND I is another of the "good" type of these kind of flicks.

    Sepiatone

    • Like 1
  6. It isn't a matter of the country's origin a near millenia ago, but of what it's NOW considered.  By your reckoning, then Puerto Rico  shouldn't be considered a "Hispanic" country as originally, the indigenous peoples of the island weren't Spanish.    

    But as my insert points out, Romania was once home to a significant Slavic-speaking population.  Which is likely why it gets considered by many to be a Slavic enclave.  Eastern European, y'know... "guilty" by association.  ;) 

    The Slavs who migrated to the U.S. wasn't a large enough migration to be a "significant" Slavic-speaking population as in Romania. Plus, even the largest Slavic immigration didn't hit these shores until well after this nation was established, which wasn't the case over in Romania.   And over history, many borders of many countries were unstable and often moved West t0 East and back again several times.  For example...

    Both of my Grandfathers came from small Polish villages so far East in Poland that when one was born the village was considered to be in Poland, and when he immigrated to the U.S. that village was considered to be a RUSSIAN village, so the staff at Ellis Island designated him as Russian.  The other grandfather, before coming here, married a Russian girl from a neighboring village that was over the Russian border when she was born(a Grandmother I only met once) but was back in Poland by the time they married and came over here (1905).  And if the Russian/Polish border was so fluid in the 19th and 18th centuries (and likely earlier as well), it's not hard to imagine other Eastern European  nations experiencing a similar situation.

    Sepiatone

    • Like 1
  7. 14 hours ago, sewhite2000 said:

    I'm not gonna provide a big, splashy photo, but I think the '80s or very early '90s also gave us The Name of the Rose, with Sean Connery as sort of the Sherlock Holmes of his medieval abbey, working to solve a murder with detecting techniques viewed by some as blasphemous. Also with Christian Slater.

    Good novel too.  I was glad to see it was very closely adapted for the screen.

    Sepiatone

    • Like 1
  8. Yeah, TX.  "Race" was obviously misused there.  Funny to think....

    These days likely African-Americans DON'T think  of the Irish and the English as different "races".  Those two, plus the Scottish, French, Italians, Germans, Polish, etc.  all all part of the WHITE "race".  ;) 

    Sepiatone

  9. Seeing as the entire name is CZECHOSLOVAKIA,   I'd beg to differ.  And be Nazi allies?  The Munich agreement merely made a large part of the nation a part of Germany in a land grab.

    This, from WIKI:

    Place names that are of Slavic origin abound in Romania, indicating that a significant Slavic-speaking population used to live in the territory.[64] The first Slavic groups settled in Moldavia and Wallachia in the 6th century,[65] in Transylvania around 600.[66] After the Avar Khaganate collapsed in the 790s, Bulgaria became the dominant power of the region, occupying lands as far as the river Tisa.[56] The Council of Preslav declared Old Church Slavonic the language of liturgy in the First Bulgarian Tsardom in 893.[67] The Romanians also adopted Old Church Slavonic as their liturgical language.

    Sepiatone

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...