Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

sagebrush

Members
  • Posts

    2,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sagebrush

  1. Yes, an Organ as accompaniment to the films would be very exciting. The Stanford Theatre in Palo Alto, CA, used to have a Wurlitzer for their silent films, and they would nearly always sell out (even on on Wed night showing!)

    The classic comedies are probably a sure bet, as well as any dramas which are timeless favorites such as Phantom Of The Opera, Ben-Hur, King Of Kings, Thief Of Baghdad,Nosferatu, Broken Blossoms, Metropolis, Flesh And The Devil, The Big Parade, The Merry Widow, The Sheik, Greed, and Sunrise.

    I hope it works out for you, bombaybob. If I lived there, you would see me at every showing!

  2. I actually don't mind dubbed or subtitles. I do agree, though, that suitable voices should be used for the dubbing. There were/are so many voice actors out there that there's no reason as to why Mastroianni's voice had to be that passive. Subtitles are Ok with me, too, but I feel like I miss a lot of the visual because I'm reading the dialogue. Also, I have a 26" screen, which is definitely large enough to watch the picture but not quite large enough to see the subtitles effectively.

    It's funny, I was watching A Man To Remember this morning, and the Dutch subtitles, which are kind of large and of an unique font for subtitles, was very easy for me to read from across the room.

    • Like 1
  3.  

    10 hours ago, dianedebuda said:

    Fedya and jamesjazzguitar, if I'm understanding you, you're both in favor of the new default, oldest post first order.  That's what I was wanting as an option in the orig post.  What I'm trying to visualize is how the posters who prefer the latest post first order read a thread when there's been more than 1 message added since the last time they visited the thread.  I look at the forum every morning and it always just seemed so awkward to me, particularly with long posts.  Don't you have to scroll down to your last read, then up, down, up, down until you reach the top? Again, not a challange to the earliest first order preference, just curiousity.  Maybe it's simply that you're on the forum a lot and you see posts shortly after entry so there's no "to be read" stack up.  In that case, it's more like email & I "get it".  Back to lurking :)

    Also, if you look to the right of the forum topic, it shows the name of the last person to post on that topic. If you click the time it states under the name, it will take you to the most recent page and post.

    Ie, I saw jamesjazzguitar's name to the right of this topic heading in the general discussions, so I clicked on the time of his post under his name and it took me to the newest post.

  4. 3 hours ago, Bogie56 said:

    ...As far as youtube goes I just see a black square with the message "An Error occurred. Try watching this video on youtube or enable JavaScript etc."
    Javascript is enabled on my browser so it is not that.

    I find that sometimes it is the browser. I have no explanation for it, but if I'm using IE and I get a list of "black screens" for videos, I switch to Firefox or Chrome, and it works.

  5. 14 hours ago, ChristineHoard said:

    It's getting better.  Now at the top instead of saying "sign on" all the time even though I may be signed on, it has my name and avatar.  But, please, shrink the emojis and I'd still like the option of most recent posts listed first but I can go with the way it is if that's what the majority of people want.

    I agree with you; most recent posts should be first. If the first post viewable is 2 years old, it may no longer be relevant. It makes more sense to be able to research back if needed.

    • Like 1
  6. In Sleeper from 1973, Diane Keaton asks Woody Allen what he believes in. 

     

    Woody responds: "Sex and death. Two things that come once in a lifetime. But, at least after death you're not nauseous."

     

    Then they kiss.

    So many funny lines in that film!  A few of my favorites:

     

    Keaton-  "It's hard to believe that you haven't had sex for 200 years."

    Allen- " 204, if you count my marriage."

     

     

    Allen- "I'm what you would call a teleological, existential atheist. I believe that there's an intelligence to the universe, with the exception of certain parts of New Jersey."

     

     

    Allen- "This stuff tastes awful. I could make a fortune selling it in my health food store."

    • Like 2
  7. Eh, I must be the only person on the planet who dislikes Danny Elfman's soundtrack for NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS.

    While I really liked his score for PEE WEE'S BIG ADVENTURE, once you put lyrics to his music, it just becomes un-melodic forced talking not unlike Henry Higgins (to me at least)

     

    I'm pretty critical of movie soundtracks, preferring compositions written especially for the movie that actually propel the story, like Hollywood's "golden age".

     

    That said, I do really love the music used for PAPER MOON '73 all radio hits played on the radio in the movie. Unfortunately, this soundtrack hasn't been released on CD, only vinyl.

     

    I did just buy the CD of DARJEELING LIMITED because it has several snippets of favorite classic Bollywood theme songs sprinkled throughout, with only 2 songs by the Kinks.

    You're definitely not the first person I've heard of who doesn't care for Danny Elfman's score or his other music.

    I was a fan of Oingo Boingo (they were actually one of the very few bands from the 1980's whom I liked) and I always liked Elfman's singing voice. I think he's a clever lyricist and his music  takes unexpected turns when you think it is going in a particular direction.

    My sister doesn't care for him, either. She covers her ears in pantomime pain!

  8. Have you had a chance to watch Return of Dracula 1958 with Francis Lederer? It played on TCM one Sunday and I missed the beginning, but saw it On Demand a few days later. Unfortunately, it was only on that one day, but it's a pretty good flick for that time period. And it's not a Hammer film.

    I rather enjoyed it- but I'm not sure if it's just that I like Francis Lederer!

  9. Yea Jean Hagen has a way of playing seedy very convincingly. I watcher her recently in The Asphalt Jungle.

    I was in the other room from the one in which the TV is when her scene came up. I thought at first I was hearing Judy Holiday. Then I walked back into the living room and realized it was Jean Hagen. She is definitely a scene stealer!

    • Like 1
© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...