Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

CinemaInternational

Members
  • Posts

    4,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by CinemaInternational

  1. 3 hours ago, TikiSoo said:

    Annoying. I especially agree with that last sentence- I want to be caught up in a film-at least when seeing it the first time.

    Except the movie I just watched STAR 80 (1983)

    This is the story of model Dorothy Stratton who was murdered by her husband in 1980. I was the same age as Stratton when she died and wanted to know more details of her story since I was too busy at the time to watch the news. 

    Mariel Hemingway (also the same age at the time) plays Dorothy. Hemingway absolutely embodied the innocence & charm of Stratton, although some might feel her performance was a bit flat or wooden. With that soft sweet face & voice, I felt the character was underplayed, evoking a shy and unassuming young girl. Talented Eric Roberts plays her "pimp" husband to perfection-boy, is he slimy!

    Since Stratton was a model -a Playboy centerfold- there are many beautiful stills and scenes with Hemingway bare breasted and in suggestive poses. I don't think it's any spoiler saying there is also graphic sex & violence in the last 5 minutes that was uncomfortable for me to watch. Just a warning for those who have a tough time with that sort of thing like I do.

    The 2 leads are excellent but the standout for me was the direction (Bob Fosse) & editing. Very emotional, artistic and clever all evoking the feeling you're a voyeur watching real life and flashbacks. Sordid real life. Painful. I won't ever watch this again.

    Star80poster.jpg

    I haven't seen the film.... but I was just looking at a bio about Bob Fosse within the last few weeks and the section about the making of Star 80 was fascinating, if also disturbing. It was pretty clear that everyone involved was more than a bit uncomfortable with it all. Fosse was really in a dark place moodwise at the time and was really afraid of hurting the actors, who he truly liked while filming such sordid scenes. Eric Roberts hated playing his role (he got it though over the original pick, Richard Gere). The whole crew were dreading the filming of the ending, since the film was shot in sequence. It also remarked how unlike most crime films, almost every single moment of the film was meticulously planned, almost choreographed before filming.

  2. 1 minute ago, TopBilled said:

    Thanks. Yes, I figured I was missing some. If you locate any more, please let me know and I will add them to my earlier post.

    I'm just happy to see so many turn up there! I already caught up with The Happy Ending and The hospital and I was after those for years......

    • Like 1
  3. Just now, TopBilled said:

    Yes, I thought about your earlier thread when I put this list together. There are many good titles from UA that were produced in the 60s and 70s.

    Indeed. Their later glory years, then they were much curtailed after Heaven's Gate. Just for the record, one of their 80s films, Betrayed (1988) is also on Prime as well, so that can be added to the list. I think that 1984's Pope of Greenwich Village is also up as well.

    • Thanks 1
  4. 5 minutes ago, TopBilled said:

    THE HOURS didn't work for me either. 

    TCM's idea of including Paramount films in its Oscar scheduling is to show HOLD BACK THE DAWN, THE LOST WEEKEND, sometimes THE HEIRESS, sometimes STALAG 17 and then one or two more recent offerings like those you've mentioned. 

    They never show anything directed by Cecil B. DeMille, and he had a big Oscar winning picture at Paramount-- THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH (1952).

    Paramount controls the Republic film library (there were almost 1000 feature films produced by Republic Pictures from 1935 to 1959, not counting serials). So it would certainly behoove TCM to partner up with Paramount more.

    That's true. Paramount has a rich history, and so much is undereen. Not just De Mille, but many 30s/40s films not seen for years, the Hal Wallis productions, even titles from the 70s and 80s that are very rare occurrences on TV

    • Like 1
  5. 1917, I guess. Alternate:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

    Joaquin Phoenix

    Renee Zellweger

    Brad Pitt

    Laura Dern

    Bong Joon-Ho/Parasite

    Little Women

    Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

    parasite

    joker (blah) Hope that 1917 wins here.

    "I 'm Going to Love Myself Again"/Rocketman Alternate:" Into the Unknown "/Frozen II

    Ford V Ferrari

    once Upon a Time in Hollywood

    Little Women

    The Lion King

    bombshell

    1917

    1917

    Toy Story 4

  6. 15 hours ago, Mr. Gorman said:

    I just finished watching THE CHEAP DETECTIVE (1978) on tape.  I was going to watch it a few night ago, but got too tired to concentrate.  So I ended up stuffing the videocassette into the unit this evening.  I've seen it several times, but not lately.  And I've always wondered what was c/u/t at the last minute before its release.  On the opening credits 'CAROLE WELLS' is billed, but does not appear in the movie.  She gets a credit at the end as the 'Hat Check Girl'.  And then there are numerous credits at the end as well for a number of characters who do not appear in the released film.  → I'm guessing somebody with power at Columbia thought there was a sequence or two that slowed down the pacing of the picture so they were excised.   

    They might have been cut thanks to the pan and scan.

  7. 1 minute ago, TopBilled said:

    They don't seem to be showing as many post-2000 films as they used to for Oscar month. They're mostly relying on all the MGM/UA Oscar pictures in the Turner library (1925 to 1986). Plus a few choice selections from Sony (Columbia), Paramount and Fox that highlight their favorite Oscar caliber directors, like Elia Kazan, Billy Wilder and Stanley Kramer.

    So I can see why people complain about how predictable it's become and how they're not really bringing in as many premieres in February as they could. For instance, there are several dozen films from Republic Pictures that had Oscar nominations. And there are many films from Universal that had Oscar nominations they are overlooking each year.

    Plus many Paramount titles haven't shown in a long time. But Paramount is bringing The Firm and The Hours this year. I liked the former in spite of a confusing ending, but The Hours was too dry for me outside of the performances.

  8. On 1/29/2020 at 10:45 AM, Sepiatone said:

    Ain't it the truth.   And doesn't it seem that movies which "beat you over the head with the social issue du jour"  mostly attract people who are in line with the film maker's point of view that the movie winds up simply preaching to the choir?  And having a major movie made that supports their POV makes them feel somehow superior to the rest of the heartless rabble.   Causing "roundtable" discussions by people in the "biz" and on shows like THE VIEW to proclaim them "important" movies.  But of course, they're only "important" to particular and exclusive groups of people. 

     

    There have always been message films, but it is true that some films these days force-feed it too hard. I saw a title on HBO yesterday from 2018 called The Hate U Give. It was like being hit on the back of the head repeatedly with a frying pan for over two hours. I got the picture within 5 minutes about what we were supposed to think, but then it went on endlessly. Sincere performances could only help so much.

  9. On 1/29/2020 at 2:42 PM, Hibi said:

    Was there much difference?

    Nudity (of both genders), rape, murder, language. Up until now, it was aired in an edited cut with a TV-PG rating. The film was originally rated R, so that's some indication.

    • Thanks 1
  10. 7 minutes ago, Hibi said:

    LOL! DITTO.

    The one thing I'm curious about with the new version of West Side Story is if Rita Moreno, who is back in a small (if also reportedly beefed up role) gets another nomination for being in a new version of the film that brought her a win in  early 1962.

  11. 1 minute ago, LawrenceA said:

    That's one I can't wait to never see. Almost as unanticipated as Spielberg's West Side Story retread.

    my anticipation for it is low as well. I'm beginning to wonder if its a new trend to promote one of next year's award contenders at this year's Oscars. Last year Netflix advertised for The Irishman during a commercial break. [tangent note:  netflix films The Irishman, Atlantics, American Factory, and Marriage Story are all getting Criterion Collection DVD/Blu releases later this year]

  12. 1 minute ago, LawrenceA said:

    Zack Gottsagen was in the well-reviewed The Peanut Butter Falcon.

    Anthony Ramos was in A Star is Born in 2018, but I'm not certain why he's one of the presenters this year.

    it seems Ramos is in the highly anticipated 2020 film In the Heights, based on the Tony Award winning musical, already pegged as a contender for next year. Call it early promoting.

  13. 7 minutes ago, LawrenceA said:

    Who are Anthony Ramos, Zack Gottsagen, and George Mackay? (As yes, I know I can Google them)

    Don't know who two of them are. I know Mackay. He's the young lead of 1917. Also appeared in the 2003 Peter Pan, The boys are Back (2009), and Captain Fantastic (2016). I'm just happy to see Keaton and Weaver and Cruz and Reeves and Martin here. people i have seen in many films.

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...