Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mariaki

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

568 profile views
  1. Does Sling TV carry offer TCM? I just ran to their website and it wasn't one of the many logos featured.
  2. What's up with the Tampa Chapter? I'm in Sarasota and Tampa events would be hard for me with my work schedule, but I'm interested to hear if you got something together. Email me [...] if there's news.
  3. I'm not a fan of the modern slasher films or gore and mutilation for the sake of gore and mutilation, so I say we stop at 1980. In the 70s- Rosemary's Baby, The Wicker Man, Carrie, The Exorcist, The Shining (well, shining is 1980...) I consider them classics. And if we threw in Europe and Japan, too- wow, what a course that would be!
  4. So happy I found a thread where I can thank our wonderful instructors Professors Edwards, Ament, Gehring and Rydstrom. I loved how each had something unique and valuable to input to the course and how Ament's bubbly personality was the perfect "foil" to the others she conversed with. We were lucky to have had a range of experience and backgrounds in our professors as well, which is team teaching at its absolute best! What a great educational opportunity, and for free, for pete's sake! The dialog/conversation approach, which I experienced with the Hitchcock course, is so much better th
  5. I think you are right about the relatability of the actors. That is quite true of both. Attractive, but not unattainably gorgeous. Talented, but not at the Fred/Ginger level. But that brings me to your point about outdated standard: My standard is the lead better be either a great singer OR a great dancer to be in a musical. I didn't see high singing and dancing standards with LLL actors. I can overlook Astaire's singing because he's a great dancer and overlook Dean Martin's acting because he's a great singer, etc, but didn't find anything noteworthy with the leads of LLL that made them t
  6. I must be a curmudgeon or maybe its just that I watch a lot of old movies with INCREDIBLE talen,t because though I liked "The Greatest Showman," it didn't wow me. I am a circus fan so I had big hopes, and I enjoyed the big dance numbers and one smaller beautiful one that included the dancers dangling acrobatcally, but I didn't find the music overall captivating and felt the "theme" song was played and "stomped" out too frequently so it became redundant. But what a fabulous topic for a musical! Can we try just one more film, please?
  7. I would be interested in hearing opinions on LaLa Land. I felt "OK" about it just because it was something different and I appreciated the attempt. (Plus I loved the ballet homage at the end.) But thinking about it now after re-watching so many amazing old musicals reminds me how anemic the songs were and how "first dance at the wedding" the dancing was.
  8. Great post, Charlie's Girl! I feel the same about the Beatles though I gained my love and respect from my dad's younger brother who lived with us a while in the late 1960s and played drums in our basement! My first song as a child was "Baby You're a Rich Man", my mother told me. I know I liked the part about "keep all your money in a big brown bag inside a zoo. What a thing to do!" When I was 13 I saw "A Hard Days' Night" in the dollar theater near my house at least 12 times over 3 days. I emerged from that weekend feeling like I knew each Beatle in depth, which made our professors' di
  9. Hard to pick just one! I thought the "war prep, during the war, and post-war" discussion of the 1940s was fascinating. So was discussion on race with Cabin in the Sky and Showboat. I like how each week our instructors really drove home the point that film is a reflection of the period in which it is made regardless of the period of the film story. That brought a strong cultural/historical view to each discussion and broadened the scope of film watching.
  10. Some observations: 1. An empty city sidewalk at night is a sexy location. It's the post-crowd, end-of-night, intimate time of a date. It is a blank canvas full of possibilities. (Think Singing in the Rain, though Kelly is contemplating alone.) 2. I love how she uses the iron railings as props to hang on to and stroke. Gives her hands something expressive to do. (Kelly and the lamp post.) 3. The camera does a wonderful smooth swirl around her that is both vertical and horizontal when she is on the stairs, like its draping her in satin. It's done to get Shariff back in th
  11. I adore Rex Harrison and Audrey Hepburn, but I could never buy them as a couple at the end of this film. On his part, I get no attraction to her whatsoever, not even in the upper class British "we seem to get along all right; what say we make it official?" sort of way. As far as an auteur link with Gaslight, I notice the way the camera follows Hepburn in her emotional collapse in a similar manner that it followed Bergman during at least one of hers. Both are beautiful, feminine, and emotionally fragile women, being manipulated by men. They flit through several mental attitudes and emoti
  12. Thanks for another great post! There is no doubt that Cukor did shine directing all the leading ladies of the decades, including those with difficult reputations. Did his POV favor women in a way that didn't bring out the same in his leading men? (Real or imagined by the men?) On the one hand, being called "a woman's director" is a compliment, and on the other, a career disadvantage, not because of any so-called "vice" of being gay, but because leading men might be worried about being upstaged by the women under Cukor's direction. Cukor's homosexuality didn't need much coding since it rea
© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
  • Create New...