Jump to content

Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sukhov

  1. Interview with the French great Jean-Luc Godard that was hosted on Instagram a couple months ago. I thought he was pretty funny ("working girls" :lol: ) in this and he discusses everything from the current virus to working with FNW greats like Anna Karina and Truffaut. 



  2. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/487713-slavoj-zizek-epidemics-covid/

    Slavoj Zizek: Epidemics are like wars, they can drag on for YEARS

    We should stop thinking that after a peak in the Covid-19 epidemic things will gradually return to normal. The crisis will drag on. But this doesn’t mean the situation is hopeless.

    In the Marx Brothers’ comedy Duck Soup, Groucho (as a lawyer defending his client at a court) says: “He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don’t let that fool you. He really is an idiot.” 

    Something along these lines should be our reaction to those who display their basic distrust of state orders and see the lockdowns as a conspiracy of the state power which uses the epidemics as a pretext to deprive us of our basic freedoms: “The state is imposing lockdowns which deprive us of our freedoms, and it expects us to control each other in how we obey this order; but this should not fool us, we should really follow the lockdown orders.”


    One should note how calls to abolish lockdowns come from the opposite ends of the traditional political spectrum. In the US, they are propelled by libertarian Rightists, while in Germany, small Leftist groups advocate them. In both cases, medical knowledge is criticized as a tool of disciplining people, treating them as helpless victims who should be isolated for their own good. What is not difficult to discover beneath this critical stance is the stance of not-wanting-to-know: if we ignore the threat, it will not be so bad, we’ll manage to pass through it… 

    The US libertarian Right claims lockdowns should be eased so that people will be given back their freedom of choice. But what choice is it? 

    • Thanks 1

  3. https://paulcockshott.wordpress.com/2020/05/20/debate-on-responses-to-the-pandemic/


      Opening Statement Paul Cockshott

      In defence of the COVID lockdown

      There is no doubt that the best option for a country is to use border controls, tracking tracing an isolation to prevent COVID-19 even starting widespread community transmission. But if that fails, Lockdowns are needed. I have been challenged to debate by an opponent of lockdowns for the Covid-19 crisis. I will be arguing for a policy in which lockdowns are a key element. It will cover the following points:

      1. First I will show that COVID-19 is a serious danger.
      2. Next I will show that the herd immunity policy that the Tories initially advocated would lead to catastrophic numbers of dead in any country that followed it.
      3. I will then review the evidence for the success of lockdowns.
      4. Finally I will outline what should be the long term policy of any government trying to deal with the crisis.

      How fatal is COVID-19

      As of the end of March the best estimate of fatality rates was around 1%. An article in The Lancet reported :


      A unique situation has arisen for quite an accurate estimate of the CFR of COVID-19. Among individuals onboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship, data on the denominator are fairly robust. The outbreak of COVID-19 led passengers to be quarantined between Jan 20, and Feb 29, 2020. This scenario provided a population living in a defined territory without most other confounders, such as imported cases, defaulters of screening, or lack of testing capability. 3711 passengers and crew were on board, of whom 705 became sick and tested positive for COVID-19 and seven died, giving a CFR of 0·99%.


      This figure of 1% was based on 7 deaths, so was subject to considerable random noise. It could have been too low or too high. It is necessary to have larger samples to be more confident.

      More data comes from the epidemics in Italy and New York. For instance the province of Bergamo has had a population death rate of 0.58%, [Modi et al May 2020] .  The caveat to this lower bound is that we lack data on what percentage of the Bergamo population were infected.

      The infection death rate has to be higher than the population death rate, only part of the population will have been infected. Modi et al estimate that the lower bound on the infection death rate from the Lombardy data is 0.61%, the actual rate is likely to be higher.


      More accurate data has become available from a  serology survey in New York. A summary is given on the Worldometer site.



       12.3% of the population in the state had COVID-19 antibodies as of May 1, 2020.  This percentage would indicate that 1,671,351 people infected with SARS-CoV-2 as of May 1. Total of actual deaths: 13,156 confirmed + 5,126 probable + 5,148 additional excess deaths calculated by CDC = 23,430 actual COVID-19 deaths as of May 1, 2020 in New York City. The CDC added in deaths of those who died outside of hospital settings. 

      Allow for the fact that the disease takes some 3 weeks to kill people, and allow 1 week for antibodies to appear, this implies we need to look for total deaths in New York on or around the 14 May, to estimate fatality from those who had been infected by  May 1. Below I present a calculation assuming the same ratios between hospital and non hospital deaths.

      So this is somewhat higher and is still conservative, since not all people infected on the 1 May who will not recover will have died by the 13th May.



      We have a range of estimates of the death rate going from an absolute lower limit of 0.61% for Italy to 1.68 for New York, with the cruise line figure of 1% sitting in the middle.

      The New York data is arguably more reliable than the Bergamo data, based as it is on larger samples and being backed by random sampling of the population for antibodies. 

    • Thanks 1

  4. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/488650-slavoj-zizek-schmidt-cuomo-matrix/

    Slavoj Zizek: The Schmidt-Cuomo digital future is a highway to the Matrix

    The basic functions of New York state could soon be “reimagined” under the alliance of Governor Andrew Cuomo and Big Tech personified. Is this the testing ground for a dystopian “no-touch” future?

    It may appear that the basic choice we have in coping with the pandemic is the one between the Trump way (return to economic activity in the conditions of market freedom and profitability, even if this means thousands of more deaths) and what our media decry as the Chinese way (total digitalized state control of individuals).

    However, in the United States, a third option is now propagated by the New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and ex-CEO of Google Eric Schmidt, with Michael Bloomberg plus Bill and Melinda Gates in the background – Naomi Klein of the Intercept called this option a “Screen New Deal.” It promises safety from infection while maintaining all the personal freedoms liberals care for – but does it have a chance to work?

© 2020 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
  • Create New...