Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Bethluvsfilms

Members
  • Posts

    4,734
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bethluvsfilms

  1. Love, love LOVE this flick! Cary Grant at his manic best, Raymond Massey at his most sinister, Peter Lorre at the height of his haplessness and Jack Carson as the eternally clueless keystone cop....what more can you ask for?
  2. 1385, 1389 and 1390 I know I haven't seen as of yet. Not so sure about 1381, 1383 and 1384. 1387 and especially 1388 are my favorites in here. I also like 1382 really well.
  3. Great scene. (SPOILERS here) This was Logan's revenge against Clayton for hunting down and killing all his friends. I think it was also partly for survival, Logan knew he was a marked man as long as Clayton was alive, but still his main motivation for slitting Clayton's throat was for Clayton's dispatching every last one of Tom's gang.
  4. I agree, CAMELOT, despite its fine cast, was a real dud, and not the kind of movie I would want to see again. Perhaps the movie might have worked better if they had tossed out the songs and just made it a big dramatic epic. Frankly it's a real bizarre viewing experience watching Richard Harris and Vanessa Redgrave sing.
  5. Total agreement with you there. Rex, good as he was, was probably the least deserving of the nominees. It's too bad that it couldn't have been Burton or O'Toole who won that year, neither man won any competitive Oscars despite later nominations (though O'Toole did get an Honorary one many years later).
  6. Been awhile since I saw that one. Will have to catch that one. Should be interesting to see Moore during his younger, pre-ARTHUR days.
  7. As far as the Best Actress of 1964 goes, my vote would not have gone to either Audrey Hepburn or Julie Andrews (Andrews made a great Mary Poppins but it wasn't an Oscar worthy performance IMO). Both great actresses, but neither of them could touch Kim Stanley in SEANCE ON A WET AFTERNOON.
  8. I love THE BREAKING POINT and I totally agree Garfield turns in one of his best performances. It's a shame he wasn't nominated for Best Actor that year. Patricia Neal also shines as does Wallace Ford as the sleazeball trying to arm-twist Garfield into going along with the mission. I try not to compare POINT with TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT, both great films in their own right regardless of which film was more faithful to Hemingway's story. POINT does end on a bit of a sad note, I feel so sorry for the little boy. Classic film all the way.
© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...