Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

FredCDobbs

Members
  • Posts

    25,502
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by FredCDobbs

  1. I think some people, maybe some low-level guys at print or electronic labs, or some higher level “restorers” at major studios or distributors do some of their own manipulating, without asking anyone's permission..

     

    Anyone along the way, during any of the copy and dub sessions, can program their printers (mechanical or electronic) to turn ANY outdoor daylight scene into a day-for-night final result.

     

    I think some people have done this, because I know I’ve seen much brighter prints on TCM in the past, and the first meeting between Wilson and Shane was almost in full daylight originally, since the expressions on their faces were very important to see. But we could not see those expressions in tonights dark scenes. Someone was responsible for making tonights print too dark in the day-for-night scenes.

     

    This puts TCM people in the position of demanding a print with "Bye Shane" on the sound track, and the day-for-night scenes being brighter than tonight's print, just like the film original day-for-night scenes were much brighter when I first saw it on the big screen in 1953, and on earlier TCM prints, which is an impossible position for TCM to be in.

  2. Thanks fellas.....

     

    I don’t know the reason why, but it seems that if a new wide-open country has millions of head of native wild cattle already in place, rounding them up for sale would be the easiest thing to do.

     

    The buffalo weren’t all killed off until after the Civil War and the completion in 1869 of the trans-continental railroad. For 300 years the Spanish imported cattle from Europe, and the cows didn’t do as well on the open grazing land as Buffalo did.

     

    So why go to the expense of importing thousands of cattle and waiting years for herds to expand and grow, while there were millions of free buffalo still available in the 1700s and early 1800s? Why didn’t they sell the meat and the hides? They did that to the cows. Cow hides have always been used for clothes, shoes, boots, coats, etc. But I think they didn’t need to import the cows.

     

    I’m thinkin’ maybe that buffalo might have been more independent than cattle and were perhaps too difficult to keep in one small range, and to difficult to round up, control, and herd. Like trying to herd cats. In early cattle decades, fences weren’t used and weren’t needed, so maybe they stayed around grazing in one place better than the buffalo did, in the era before fencing.

     

    It might have taken too many cowboys to move a small group of buffalo. Plus, the lack of pickup trucks back in the old days........ :)

     

     

     

  3. If they had named him Jerry Lipschitz, it would have been even more obvious. Of course, the character was played on Broadway by Edward G. Robinson, who actually WAS Jewish.

     

    In a New York Times review of a revival of the play, it says he was Jewish and she was Gentile, which caused some of the stress in the relationship because of their different families' opinions about the relationship.

     

     

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/01/theater/middle-of-the-night-a-paddy-chayefsky-play.html?_r=0

     

    Sparks fly, only to detonate discord among their families: the Girl’s protective Mother (Amelia Campbell) and Kid Sister (Alyssa May Gold); and the Manufacturer’s spinster Sister (Denise Lute), headstrong Daughter (Melissa Miller) and milquetoast Son-in-Law (Mr. Bartels again).

     

    Another source of tension: He’s Jewish and she’s gentile, a difference Chayefsky uses to associate their union with a larger societal need for tolerance.

  4.    Jewish people are a very happy people when they are not harassed or at the worst murdered by people who call themselves Christians. The last two thousand years bear this out. Why did many Jewish actors change their names ? They didn't do it because they were ashamed of their heritage. They did it so they could work and be popular among those misguided souls out there who went to the movies.

     

    So, instead of talking about films, you are going to use this thread to attack a lot of other people on this board who haven't done anything wrong?

    • Like 1
  5. Has this one been on TCM?  there is a terrific British film and I cannot remember the name. The little boy and a butler and a staircase and it's driving me crazy????

     

    I don't think that is this film because there is only one death in the one you are thinking about, and it's a lady. The title is something about "disappointment", the kid is disappointed in his male hero because the kid thinks he killed the lady by pushing her down the stairs. I can't remember the name either.

     

    HA! THE FALLEN IDOL 1948 was that other film.

     

    ============

     

    But I seem to remember this kid in Kid's film who gets rejected by other kids when he tries to join their soccer game. Seems like he lives upstairs in an apartment and has no children as friends.

  6. It is interesting that  Jewish film executives such as Mayer, Warner, Cohn, Goldwyn, and Selznick stayed away from Jewish subjects, While the non-Jewish Zanuck went and made GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT.

     

    I wonder if they got any backlash from making films like the two George Arliss films I linked below.

     

    Those films seem wide open about old history in England, they are interesting, and they certainly portray the Jewish Disraeli and Rothschild as being very ethnic and quite intelligent and good men, which I like about the films. And in fact they tend to suggest in the films that some Gentiles weren't so bright. But that doesn't bother me because I grew up learning that by observation. Other ethnic Europeans were shown as being nice guys too, in many old films, and harder working and brighter than some of America's Anglo Saxons. Well, I know that too.

     

    But those kinds of early Jewish films were phased out, and Jews pretty much weren't mentioned much in Hollywood movies or on TV during the 1950s and 60s and 70s, except in the increasing number of new-type Holocaust films.

  7. I only wish that the programmers had included a few films from the early sound era that were set on the Lower East Side. One in particular would be Fannie Hurst's Symphony of Six Million, one of the under the radar classics that TCM has brought to our attention in the past.  It's a film that's got a bit of everything, but most particularly it depicts the moral struggle with all its shades of ambiguity,   an internal conflict that's been so central to the "Jewish experience."

     

    That is a great movie. TCM aired it a couple of times. The music is wonderful, by Max Steiner. Seems to be modeled after Cantor music.

     

    I also like DISRAELI, with George Arliss. That is a fantastic film, with a lot of racial arguments between some of the Anglo Saxons in England and George. He wins every argument. :)

     

    The Bank of England refuses to grant him a loan to buy the Suez Canal for England, so he goes to one of his Jewish banker friends and gets the loan.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtH80dw4KOg

  8. Yes, true.

     

    This very same discovery of mine also applies to THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION.

     

    This was a booklet published in the US, Germany, and I think a few other European countries, early in the 20th Century, and it was supposed to be a “secret” plan of The Jews to take over the world.

     

    After years of searching, I finally was able to track down a copy, and I discovered that the booklet can apply to ANY GROUP, including Republicans, Democrats, Nazis, Communists, Vegetarians, Motorcycle Buffs, and any group at all that wants a lot of publicity or that wants to dominate a country or the world.

     

    So, to claim it belongs to or originated with one particular group, is just meaningless. And, in fact, in the 1990s I read that some crazy Japanese cult was using it as their own cult Manifesto and Guidebook.

     

    :)

  9. And thank you Kidd for these wonderful puzzles.

     

    I read somewhere that doing puzzles like this helps postpone dementia and altimeters. :)

     

    +++++++++++++++++

     

    Opps, not altimeters.... that's what you measure altitude with. :)

     

    I mean to say alzheimer's

  10. Well, it looks English, maybe in London. It seems to start off with a flashback to around 1905 and an old horse-drawn fire wagon, and an early Roosevelt type Teddy Bear. Then it flashes forward to a new modern fire truck of the 50s or 60s.

     

    The destroyed buildings I'm trying to figure out. Is that WW II damage or demolition for modern buildings to go up?

     

    Ok, what are our two young British friends up to? Is it business, crime, comedy?

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...