Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

FredCDobbs

Members
  • Posts

    25,502
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by FredCDobbs

  1. Actually, it's the method of taxation that seems a little odd. British government spies dirving around neighborhoods with special vans searching for people who have TVs turned on.

     

    In the US our government taxes everybody and then gives a little of that money to our PBS network.

  2. > Here is my question. How do you know whether your TV

    > is up to date or not?

     

    It would have cost you $500 more to have a digitial tuner built into it.

     

    Here is a list of TVs from Wal Mart. Regular TVs that can show high definition pictures, but they DON'T have the digital tuners in them. You have to buy one extra and Wal Mart doesn't sell them yet.

     

    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.do?cat=548996

     

    It's called an ATSC tuner.

     

    Here are the Wal Mart sets that already have them built in:

     

    http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_constraint=3944&search_query=ATSC+tuner&ic=24_0&Continue.x=22&Continue.y=14

  3. > I am curious being new to Us society, are

    > terrestrial board cast Free ie unlike cable you

    > don?t have to pay, even for a license.

     

    In cities people can receive up to 6 to maybe 10 free TV channels. In rural areas it might be two or three, what we call "the major networks" or "the broadcast networks".

     

    >if so

    > then this would be forcing many people who do not

    > watchTV viva cable or satellite to take a paying

    > service with cable or satellite provider.

     

    I think the major networks will still be free.

     

    Some people in rural areas do have to pay for them if they have to get all their signals via Satellite, such as if they live 30 or more miles away from a TV transmitter. I'm 20 miles from a small town, so I get 5 broadcast channels free, and the other special channels for about $49 a month via satellite.But I also get about 150 satellite channels I never watch.

  4. Well, obviously, they?ll need to set up a National Bureau for Elderly and Stupid Television Viewers, with teams of social workers who will go out and set up their converters for them. The bums and non-working hobos will have federal offices where they can get the converters for free. The tax for this service will be attached to the telephone bills of all us middle-class people, just as we now pay for free home phones for Indians via our telephone taxes. Out where I live, it is too expensive to run long telephone lines to remote homes on the reservation, so the feds give out free cell phones to them here. The new hidden cameras in the HD TVs and the reverse transmitters will keep the feds informed as to what we are doing and saying in our own homes, so remember never to complain about the government.

  5. I don?t go to the movies anymore because the movies aren?t any good anymore.

     

    The last films I went to see in the theater were Selena, Schindler?s List, and Jurassic Park.

     

    I?d like to go see ?The Good Soldier?, because I liked the TCM commercials about it, but looks like that movie was not shown in theaters because it got such bad reviews.

  6. > I'm sorry, Fred, but I thought the ending was a

    > horrible deus ex machina.

    >

    > Better (in my opinion) would have been for Sadie to

    > be put on the junk, and then when Davidson wondered

    > where she went, have the response be that, well, he

    > wanted Sadie off the island on the first boat -- and

    > Sadie did indeed leave the island on the first boat.

     

    That would have been a nice ending. But there have been other types of endings to real stories that resemble this one. They are rare but I've heard of them happening.

     

    I think this film should have been nominated for a few academy awards, but it wasn't.

     

    I think the whole package was good, the music, the filming, the editing, the acting, the script, and the editing.

  7. > I think the people who were interviewed in the

    > documentary that TCM showed with the latest batch of

    > Forbidden Hollywood made a pretty compelling

    > case that there were better and stronger roles for

    > women before the code than those made after the code,

     

    I dated some of those kinds of women. Woopie, but they are not the kind to marry.

     

    > where women were often put in more unfavorably

    > conditions

     

    Yeah, like mother, wife, decent girls.

  8. Several years ago TCM aired the short version, then a documentary about the reconstruction of the long version and then they showed the long version. Now I'm mixed up about which is which, but I think I have copies of both.

  9. I might add that back in the 1930s, '40s, and into the '50s, the original novels these stories were based on were published in the form of very cheap paperback novels, printed on crude pulpy paper, and they were sold in bus and train station newsstands and at other news stands. Before TV, news stands were a big business, selling cheap books, magazines, and newspapers from around the country.

     

    So, many men read the original books which were mostly uncensored and were very explicit in dealing with matters of sex. So, for .05cents or .10 cents a guy could buy one of these novels and read it on a bus or train trip. Then when he went to see the movie version, he knew every part of the plot that was censored out of the movies. For example, when Carmen was dressed in a kimono in the movie in the photo house, she was actually naked in the novel. While the drug she was high on was not mentioned in the movie, the book said it was ether.

     

    The books weren't censored in those days and they always served as "guides" for men who went to see the Hays Code movies but wanted to know what was really going on in the films. But the books weren't allowed to be sold to anyone under 18 or 21, depending on state law.

  10. Hmm.... I wanted to make you something outstanding or make you into something outstanding?

     

    Sounds a little like what Kane said to his wife, but not the same words.

     

    How about Clark Gable talking to Scarlett about the new house he built for her?

     

    Maybe Svengali to Trilby?

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...