Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

THE RESISTANCE TO THE ILLEGITIMATE (MENTALLY CHALLENGED OCCUPANT) BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ...


Recommended Posts

- PaulCraigRoberts.org - https://www.paulcraigroberts.org -

The Democrats’ Attack on the Second Amendment Begins

Posted By pcr3 On February 1, 2021 @ 2:15 pm In Guest Contributions | Comments Disabled

The Democrats’ Attack on the Second Amendment Begins

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/martin-armstrong/here-it-is-the-bill-to-destroy-gun-ownership/ [1] 

 
Share this page
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

rcp-logo-ss-red-250.png

Rigged All Around: The Truth About 2020 Election

Jeremy Carl, American Greatness January 30, 2021

If you have a number of children, as I do, you might be familiar with something like the following scene: A child is caught red-handed doing something he shouldn’t, say, stealing a cookie from the cookie jar. When confronted, he immediately begins to deny guilt and deflect blame.

Read Full Article »
Link to post
Share on other sites

The tendency of liberals is to create bodies of men and women-of all classes-detached from tradition, alienated from religion, and susceptible to mass suggestion-mob rule. And a mob will be no less a mob if it is well fed, well clothed, well housed, and well disciplined.
T. S. Eliot

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

" A child is caught red-handed doing something he shouldn’t, say, stealing a cookie from the cookie jar. When confronted, he immediately begins to deny guilt and deflect blame. "

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LewRockwell.com

anti-stateanti-warpro-market

 

The Digital Police State Is Being Institutionalized Throughout the Western World

By Paul Craig Roberts

PaulCraigRoberts.org

February 5, 2021

Introduction and background by Global Research: Alarming News. In Germany the Parliament (Bundestag) ratified on 29 January 2021, the implementation of Agenda ID2020.

This is a centralized general electronic data collection of every citizen to which every government agency, police – and possibly also the private sector would have access.

It covers all that is known about an individual citizen, now up to 200 points of in formation and possibly more as time goes on, from your bank account to your shopping habits, health records (vaccination records, of course), your political inclinations, and probably even your dating habits and other entries into your private sphere.

Agenda ID2020 was designed by Bill Gates as part of the “vaccination package”. It is backed by the Rockefeller Foundation, Accenture, the WEF and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, now simply called the Vaccine Alliance), also a Gates creation (2001), with HQ in Geneva, Switzerland.

Read More >> https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/paul-craig-roberts/the-digital-police-state-is-being-institutionalized-throughout-the-western-world/

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JakeHolman said:

 

 

 

trump's idea of cancel culture was trying to destroy all of the accomplishments of Obama's 8 years.

But Obama's greatest accomplishment, Obamacare, is still very popular with the American people.

Looks like, the ACA will not be canceled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Image result for breitbart logo

 

Time Magazine: ‘Secret,’ ‘Well-funded Cabal’ Worked to ‘Protect’ 2020 Election

Time magazine has published a detailed account of what it describes as a “conspiracy” between “left-wing activists and business titans” to create “an extraordinary shadow effort” to “protect” the 2020 presidential election.

The New York Times had reported on the effort in January, referring to the “Democracy Defense Coalition.” The Daily Beast hinted at it in the fall. But the Time article is the most in-depth report at what others suggested was going on behind the scenes.

Read More >> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/05/time-magazine-secret-well-funded-cabal-worked-to-protect-2020-election/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20210205

Link to post
Share on other sites
- PaulCraigRoberts.org - https://www.paulcraigroberts.org -

Is the illegitimate Biden Regime Purging the Military of Patriots and Creating a Left-wing Force to Oppress the American People?

Posted By pcr3 On February 6, 2021 @ 6:36 am In Guest Contributions | Comments Disabled

Is the illegitimate Biden Regime Purging the Military of Patriots and Creating a Left-wing Force to Oppress the American People?

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/514780-extremism-military-pentagon-stand-down/ [1] 

 
Share this page
 

Article printed from PaulCraigRoberts.org: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org

Link to post
Share on other sites

LewRockwell.com

anti-stateanti-warpro-market

 

The State Is Destroying Freedom, Life, and History By Censoring and Eliminating Information and Speech

By Gary D. Barnett

February 6, 2021

The state, I call it, where all are poison-drinkers, the good and the bad: the state, where all lose themselves, the good and the bad: the state, where the slow suicide of all — is called “life.” Just see these superfluous ones! They steal the works of the inventors and the treasures of the wise. Culture, they call their theft — and everything becometh sickness and trouble unto them! Just see these superfluous ones! Sick are they always; they vomit their bile and call it a newspaper. They devour one another, and cannot even digest themselves.”

Friedrich Nietzsche, “Thus Spoke Zarathustra”

State censorship has been evident over all time, but what is happening today, especially considering the ease of access and the voluminous amount of information available, is far beyond the scope of understanding for most in this country. The Internet is a wonder, but it is a very sharp double-edged sword. The real power among us understands this concept intimately, while the ‘public’ has little awareness of the potential for the controllers to eliminate history and speech by using the very tool that should allow for an expansion of learning and intellect. The Internet can store and make available all the works of man, both past and present, and all this information is seemingly accessible to anyone with little effort, but is that really the case?

The risk that is missed by most, is that as easy as it is to access information today, that information can be manipulated, hidden, or eliminated just as easily, and that process could be controlled by a central ‘authority’ through any of its fascist partnerships. If much of the underlying information of recorded history; books, journals, letters, and all historical and political records and writings, can be captured, controlled, or even destroyed by nefarious efforts, then that would leave available only what is stored digitally. This would be an abomination, because it would also allow for the loss of much hard knowledge of the past and present by those controlling the Internet and communication systems. For this horror to occur, all books would not have to be destroyed, but if much of the important information were restricted from view by whatever means, or made very difficult to access, then people would know only what the state wanted them to know.

We live in a digitized age where physical classic and modern works, documents, books, and papers are very seldom sought. I find this very troubling, because the general population, especially the young, have been raised and trained in an era of television, cell phones and computers, and many have never read any physical material about history, culture, nature, science, art, or any other of a multitude of subjects. In other words, they are fully dependent on the mainstream media, technology, and the Internet for all the information they get, good or bad. It takes little imagination to realize that this could lead to a planned censorship over generations so as to mold minds in a way suitable to the state. If all information is thought to be available from limited sources that can be manipulated, censored, or fully controlled, what will be available in the future is what those that gain or hold power want to be available. In reality, the future is already here.

More >> https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/gary-d-barnett/the-state-is-destroying-freedom-life-and-history-by-censoring-and-eliminating-information-and-speech/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chronicles Magazine of American Culture

 

Blog
 
February 2, 2021

The Rules of Debate No Longer Work

 

Gun rights activist Dana Loesch recently complained that she had been denied the right to respond to her critics on Twitter, according to a story reported in the New York Post. Unlike her adversaries, who are free to swing away at her, Loesch is not allowed to use Twitter’s fact-checking platform to correct their misstatements.

Loesch has also observed that her censors are failing to grasp that a true discussion requires that both sides be heard. Even if we don’t like what another person is saying, she explains, it’s best to allow that person to speak and then respond.

This was hardly the first time I heard such a recommendation being communicated to the cancel culture and to those who scorn open discussion. Indeed, some critics seem to think that a true dialogue can take place if we make the nature of debate clear.

Unfortunately, those to whom this reminder is addressed really don’t care about their critics’ arguments. They are shutting down those whose speech clashes with their ideology and political goals. It may therefore be futile to defend open debate by engaging those who have no interest in this activity, a waste of time and energy to bring up values and forms of discussion that the other side totally rejects.

It’s time to adopt a different course of action. Rather than trying to reason with those who maliciously refuse to listen, it’s time to get serious about developing alternative electronic media. Those driving leftist cancel culture would be seriously hurt financially if more and more Americans transferred their communications to friendlier providers. Fortunately, that process is already ongoing.

Yet even while the process is underway, it seems we must deal with the continued hypocrisy of the left, which waffles back and forth in its views depending upon whether it serves their purposes. Juan Williams’ Jan. 26 appearance on Fox News is a case in point. I was struck by the utterly cynical way in which he defended the electronic media’s cancel culture as a proper exercise of the right of private property, as Williams had been among the numerous progressives who wanted to criminalize the refusal of a Christian baker in Colorado to provide a cake for a gay wedding. During Williams’s defense of high-tech companies that chose to exclude dissenters from using their property, he maintained that it was just and proper to deny both the religious and property rights of the prosecuted Christian baker. Gay rights trump other rights for Williams, for he contemptuously dismissed concerns about both the property and religious rights of the baker.

The defenders of Big Tech’s sacred property rights were also conspicuous among those who wanted to mandate transgendered restroom facilities in stores and buildings a few years back. Such an action would have been an obvious, colossal violation of property rights, which would have been carried out in the name of LGBT activism.

Other egregious, state-promoted attempts to trample on property rights have also been embraced by defenders of electronic media giants. In 2005, some of these fair-weather friends of property rights were on board when the Supreme Court made a controversial—and for me, shocking—decision in Kelo v. City of New London. In this case, the court expanded the government’s right of eminent domain to allow the forced sale of private property from its owner to someone whom the state chose to favor. The victim in this instance was a person of very modest means whose home was being handed over to a mall developer to “further economic development.” This move was permitted because the government claimed that a “public use” was being served. In the name of increased economic benefit, the managerial state can now take away your property to accommodate its donors. Apparently your property is not to be protected with the same care as the right of the Big Tech monopoly to cancel your Twitter or Facebook account. By the way, both The New York Times and The Washington Post, which have been in the vanguard of the defense of high-tech interests, were ecstatic over the Kelo decision.

My stomach churns when I think about those leftists who have never shown the slightest regard for property rights but who now dishonestly defend Big Tech’s “property right” in order to ride roughshod over the rest of us. But we are not going to dissuade these malefactors of wealth and their minions by talking about the need for open debate. One can only address their duplicity and suppression of free speech by creating alternative media and then urging our friends to shun their tainted services. There is no other way forward.

 
 

Paul Gottfried

 

Paul Gottfried is editor in chief of Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture. He is also the Raffensperger Professor of Humanities Emeritus at Elizabethtown College, where he taught for 25 years, a Guggenheim recipient, and a Yale Ph.D. He is the author of 13 books, most recently Fascism: Career of a Concept and Revisions and Dissents.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • JakeHolman changed the title to THE RESISTANCE TO THE ILLEGITIMATE (MENTALLY CHALLENGED OCCUPANT) BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ...
  • TCMModerator1 locked this topic
  • TCMModerator1 unlocked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
© 2021 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...