Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

THE RESISTANCE TO THE ILLEGITIMATE (MENTALLY CHALLENGED OCCUPANT) BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ...


Recommended Posts

The greatest evils in the world will not be carried out by men with guns, but by men in suits sitting behind desks
C. S. Lewis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good.

Vince Lombardi

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is my prayer: that your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that you may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless for the day of Christ,

Philippians 1:9-10 (NIV)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Washington Examiner

The Equality Act must die in the Senate

 
 | March 03, 2021 12:00 AM

The House last week passed the Equality Act, a deceptively named bill that claims to secure equal rights but threatens the liberties of millions of people who disagree with the Left’s extremist gender ideology. The bill now moves to a split Senate, where a few centrist members voted in its support the last time it was introduced. This time, they should rethink the issue and defeat it.

The Equality Act’s purpose is to add to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit housing and workplace discrimination on the basis of “sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity.” But this is unnecessary because the Supreme Court’s recent decision Bostock v. Clayton County already prohibits such discrimination. The bill’s proponents know this, but they’re using the Equality Act as a front for the much bigger and more dangerous purpose of making the Left’s fanciful and anti-science ideas about sex and gender the law of the land.

Three clauses in the Equality Act prove this. The first is the phrase “gender identity,” which falls under the bill’s protected classes. By including “gender identity” alongside “sex” and “sexual orientation,” the Equality Act essentially eliminates biological sex as a distinct legal category and opens gender-exclusive spaces, such as women’s sports teams and female prisons, to intrusion by biological males.

Under the bill, every federally funded entity, including public schools, would be forced to allow men who say they are women into female-only spaces, such as locker rooms and bathrooms. Women’s shelters, prisons, and sports teams would also be forced to accept men so long as they identified as transgender. This is a serious threat to the physical safety of women, and it also threatens their chances at success, especially in the athletic world.

In Connecticut, for example, a handful of female high school track athletes are in court fighting a school district-mandated policy that forced the girls’ team to allow male competitors who identified as women to compete alongside them. The biological males won 19 girls state championship races in 2019, which cost the biological female runners scholarship opportunities and further competition.

The second big red flag in the Equality Act is a clause that bans discrimination on the basis of “pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition.” Because the courts and the federal government have interpreted “related medical condition” to mean “abortion,” the Equality Act could be used to force government healthcare programs and private insurers to cover abortion services. In other words, the legislation is designed to let Washington mandate taxpayer-funding of abortion and force all medical providers, even religious ones, to perform abortions.

With legislation this bad, it is difficult to say any aspect is better than others. But worst of all is the Equality Act’s insidious attempt to delete vital religious liberty protections. The bill would block the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from applying to its provisions, which means people of traditional faith could not protect their beliefs from the Left’s radicalism. Churches and religious schools that require employees not to live in open contravention of their teachings would be stripped of one of their most important lines of defense. Bakers, florists, photographers, and every other person of faith who chooses to withhold services that would make them participate in something they believe to be wrong would be left vulnerable to legal attacks from anyone who might disagree with their beliefs.

The Equality Act is a declaration of war against anyone who dares to speak out against the Left’s wild theories about sex and gender identity. It is an attempt to force the rest of the country to accept a bigoted ideology by making it legally binding and then removing the means by which concerned citizens can object.

The Senate must see the Equality Act for what it is and reject it. No bill that disenfranchises women and strips citizens of legal protection in the exercise of their faith can seriously claim to advance equality or justice. It is shameful that this bill was ever drafted. It certainly should never become law.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

rcp-logo-ss-red-250.png

Trump's Triumph at CPAC

Conrad Black, American Greatness March 2, 2021
 

The dream of a return to the pre-Trump party of post-Reagan amiable Democratic lookalike losers will not come true.

Read Full Article »
 

Is It Racist to Expect Black Kids to Do Math for Real?

John McWhorter, Substack March 2, 2021
 

Yes, serious people are arguing this. Make sure they don't infect your school district.

Read Full Article »
 
 

Can Democrats Rig the Vote Forever?

Julie Kelly, American Greatness March 2, 2021
 

Democrats, shrewdly describing election fraud as a “Big Lie,” are emboldened to get their way.

Read Full Article »
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

Luke 6:38 (NIV)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Image result for fox lnews ogo

Sean Hannity: Biden border crisis 'another political lie of the left'
Mar. 05, 2021 - 4:10 - 'Hannity' host chastises president, mainstream media for pretending southern border surge isn't happening

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237345642001#sp=show-clips

 

Sara Carter: Migrant children see Biden's stop on deportations as an 'invitation'
Mar. 05, 2021 - 6:40 - Investigative journalist sounds the alarm on growing crisis at the border in 'Hannity' exclusive

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237341144001#sp=show-clips

 

Tucker: 'Military takeover of Washington' meant to prop up Biden
Mar. 05, 2021 - 13:08 - 'Tucker Carlson Tonight' host explains the bipartisan hysteria that had lawmakers fleeing Capitol Hill

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237326751001#sp=show-clips

 

Biden administration blames Trump for crisis at US-Mexico border
Mar. 05, 2021 - 5:40 - Former Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller joins 'The Ingraham Angle' to discuss impact of Democrats' immigration policies

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237349444001#sp=show-clips

 

Will American cities see repeat of last summer's chaos?
Mar. 05, 2021 - 4:00 - Sergeants Benevolent Association President Ed Mullins gives his thoughts on 'The Ingraham Angle'

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237348031001#sp=show-clips

 

Ingraham: Democrats preside over sordid 'tale of two invasions'
Mar. 05, 2021 - 10:48 - "Ingraham Angle" hosts blasts Democrats for ignoring true threat in favor of political fearmongering

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6237344827001#sp=show-clips

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

“I tell you the truth, those who listen to my message and believe in God who sent me have eternal life. They will never be condemned for their sins, but they have already passed from death into life.

John 5:24 (NLT)

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/1/2021 at 10:48 AM, JakeHolman said:
 
 

 

 

Right, it's been about 30 days since taking office, shoot he should had painted Washington's version of the Sistine Chapel by now.

<_<

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/18/2021 at 10:35 PM, Dargo said:

Re one of good ol' boy Jake's little cut and paste offerings up there. The one where it shows little Rand Paul's spouting the following:

"They will destroy the Republican Party if the leadership is complicit with an impeachment or if leadership votes for an impeachment."

Eeeh, don't you worry about THIS here Jake, you good ol' backwater boy, you!

Nope, and because as I type this out here, I'm SURE much of the leadership of the Republican party is now sitting cowardly in many a back room throughout this country and attempting to devise WHOLE NEW WAYS to keep the participation in our elections as low as possible.

And because of course, THAT right THERE you good ol' backwater southern boy you,  the FACT that MORE people FINALLY got off THEIR fat apathetic butts in this country and actually voted, and NOT some damn stupid and FALSE idea that your fat boy Donny was "robbed", WAS the PRIMARY reason that your fat boy was legitimately DEFEATED in this past election.

And so CHEER UP here Jake, you good ol' backwater southern boy you, and because I'll BET your damn Republican leadership WILL somehow come up with new ways to keep the larger MAJORITY of this country's electorate's voices from being heard in the future, and with their thoughts and rationale being that even still having only TWO out of every THREE legitimate voters casting a ballot in this past election is STILL way too many people being involved in our electoral process.

(...uh-huh, CHEER UP, you good ol' backwater southern boy you, as who KNOWS?...maybe they'll come up with something very similar to how for so many years you good ol' backwater southern boys down there were able to keep black folks from voting)

 

That is total BS Dargo. ONLY someone as liberal as you must think this way. The whole thing about voter suppression is total BS. We on the right only want to insure that the people who ARE voting are the actual people who exist in their precincts that are enrolled to vote. If we are going to have laws in this country that one must show proof of age or identity to buy tobacco, alcohol, board airplanes and or any other enterprise requiring proof of who they are for security, it is not going to be that inconvenient for people to go and get an ID card to show who they really are, where they live, and how old they are.

It is the people on the left who only view this ID requirement as some sort of racist ploy to suppress the vote.

The average Black American who goes to buy alcohol or tobacco products more than likely never has to show ID because most of the poorest Black Americans go to their local corner stores to purchase these products and never have to show anything. It is a total lack of any requirement in most of these local stores that do not require any proof to purchase simply because they do not care. Most average middle Americans usually have to show ID to purchase these products and that is the case almost everywhere. Except poor black communities.

Why is this? Can you answer that?

If the poorest amongst us can afford to pay rent, pay their bills, and purchase products usually that require proof of ID, they sure as hell can go down to their local town offices or election offices and get a photo proof of ID. Currently 29 of the fifty states do not require any photo ID of a voter to allow them to vote. Proponents see increasing requirements for identification as a way to prevent in-person voter impersonation and increase public confidence in the election process. That is ALL I am asking.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fxreyman said:

That is total BS Dargo. ONLY someone as liberal as you must think this way. The whole thing about voter suppression is total BS. We on the right only want to insure that the people who ARE voting are the actual people who exist in their precincts that are enrolled to vote. If we are going to have laws in this country that one must show proof of age or identity to buy tobacco, alcohol, board airplanes and or any other enterprise requiring proof of who they are for security, it is not going to be that inconvenient for people to go and get an ID card to show who they really are, where they live, and how old they are.

It is the people on the left who only view this ID requirement as some sort of racist ploy to suppress the vote.

The average Black American who goes to buy alcohol or tobacco products more than likely never has to show ID because most of the poorest Black Americans go to their local corner stores to purchase these products and never have to show anything. It is a total lack of any requirement in most of these local stores that do not require any proof to purchase simply because they do not care. Most average middle Americans usually have to show ID to purchase these products and that is the case almost everywhere. Except poor black communities.

Why is this? Can you answer that?

If the poorest amongst us can afford to pay rent, pay their bills, and purchase products usually that require proof of ID, they sure as hell can go down to their local town offices or election offices and get a photo proof of ID. Currently 29 of the fifty states do not require any photo ID of a voter to allow them to vote. Proponents see increasing requirements for identification as a way to prevent in-person voter impersonation and increase public confidence in the election process. That is ALL I am asking.

 

 

 

Interesting how you target just the black community in terms of IDs.

In Kansas when they legislated that you had to have a proper ID to vote, the only people who were affected were white senior citizens-- many living in nursing homes.

I'm sure they're a great many number of poor white people who don't have IDs and who probably might have a hard time paying for one.

Targeting one specific Community as being the only poor group of people in the United States is symptomatic of what's wrong with this country.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • JakeHolman changed the title to THE RESISTANCE TO THE ILLEGITIMATE (MENTALLY CHALLENGED OCCUPANT) BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ...
  • TCMModerator1 locked this topic
  • TCMModerator1 unlocked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
© 2021 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...