Jump to content

 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
DownGoesFrazier

Hillary Clinton - take 4

Recommended Posts

More B.S. from a fugitive from justice.

 

There is no justice. That was proven today.

 

Clinton is worse than Assange. He's about the peoples' right to know. She's about doing anything she wants out of sheer arrogance and self-glory.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Ms. Clinton will take office because she gamed the nomination process brilliantly, but she was victimized by classic tragedy.  In the most bizarre political season in memory, she was the right person in the right place at the wrong time...

 

Ms. Clinton then undertook an orthodox campaign of inoffensive platitudes, defining the issues with customary clichés, and proposing vacuous solutions: doing more for this cause, making improvements in that one, assuring everyone’s access to the American Dream, I’ve been working all my life to benefit the downtrodden, and let’s build on President Obama’s successes. Her campaign was exquisitely choreographed, but it was a campaign-by-formula, unimaginative and conventional...

 

A Hillary Clinton presidency, then, would face a national majority of citizens in open rebellion. Either intuitively or consciously they are incensed with the dominance of corporate political power. This is the template of governance Ms. Clinton helped create, the one in which she is historically and demonstrably comfortable, and the one which finances her campaigns for elected office.  Wed to those donors, and locked into this mindset of the New Democratic Party, her presidency could not and would not alter significantly the status quo. Proudly she claims as much: “Let’s not start from scratch,” she says.  Corporate dominance would remain unchallenged, the rebellion ignored...

 

Reform is neither difficult nor unprecedented.  Our history displays a number of means of subordinating corporate interests to the welfare of the American people...

 

http://alicewalkersgarden.com/2016/06/the-chaos-of-a-hillary-clinton-presidency/

 

Doesn't matter.

 

Like Bush Junior, every appearance and speech will be carefully arranged to be sure that cheering sycophants are all the cameras will record, while the enormous mass of boo-ers will be shut out, confined to 'free speech zones' and kept absolutely invisible by the media.

 

The impression of her being special will be artificially maintained. And Hillary-bots everywhere will be ecstatic with the illusion..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B.S.

 

If that is the best response you can come up with there must be a lot of truths in that post.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Horowitz: The Most Frightening Political Fix
hillary_clinton_testimony_to_house_selec

Today we have witnessed a most frightening manifestation of the corruption of our political system. Doubly frightening because of what it augurs for all our futures if Hillary Clinton should prevail in the November elections. At the center of this corruption – but hardly alone - are the criminal Clintons – the Bonnie and Clyde of American politics - and their Democratic Party allies; but we should not fail to mention also the Republican enablers who would rather fight each other and appease their adversaries than win the political wars.

 

Read more Truth Revolt >

 

http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/horowitz-most-frightening-political-fix

 

11514-animated_gifchat8etf.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and is it any wonder obama endorses her?

 

 

where is his honesty and integrity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red diaper baby wingnut Horowitz doesn't

like the Clintons. What a big surprise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and is it any wonder obama endorses her?

 

 

where is his honesty and integrity?

 

The last president that has some vestiges of that was Eisenhower.

 

That bunch running in 2016 (all contenders) with any honesty and integrity?  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red diaper baby wingnut Horowitz doesn't

like the Clintons. What a big surprise.

 

That's what Charlton Heston is laughing about.

 

I always have the impression all those laughers that are posted at the end of some of these posts are laughing at the poster who posted the post. One who posts with such regularity the likes of Horrorweetz and Bullllllllllllllcannnnnon, and lean and hungry Annie who have been partisan hacks for decades. One who fears to post the likes of some observer who smacks of some even-handedness and truth, and fairness who might even have something good to say about Donnybrook and perhaps even provide a bit of enlightenment on Donnybrook's peculiar person, but no that's not good enough, to much fairness, to much light to hateful eyes, no bring on the tired old perennial nasties who must be on script and spew something that has some relish of hate in it, and to a choir that doesn't even exist, not here anyway (two or three persons do not a choir make). No wonder Heston laughs.

 

:lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRUMP THROWS DOWN: CLINTON BRIBED LYNCH

Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump suggested presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was bribing Attorney General Loretta Lynch during his campaign rally in Raleigh, North Carolina on Tuesday night.

 

bribe-2-pasted_image_at_2016_07_05_10_49

 

Crooked Hillary
 

Read more Breitbart >

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/05/trump-clinton-keeping-lynch-attorney-general-bribe/

 

11514-animated_gifchat8etf.gif

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don'tcha just HATE it when "Trump the Chump" keeps chewing on them SOUR GRAPES?

 

"Rigged"?

 

He sounds like ex heavywheight boxer LARRY HOLMES, who whenever he lost a fight, couldn't admit he'd been outboxed.  Always blamed the "rigged" system.

 

Sepiatone

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how long it will take the Republicans in Senate and House to set up committees to investigate FBI director James Comey?  Next question, how many committees will they set up?

Also, why did Trump even bring up how great Sadam Hussain was at killing terrorists?  Of course, for Sadam anyone who opposed him was a terrorist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how long it will take the Republicans in Senate and House to set up committees to investigate FBI director James Comey?  Next question, how many committees will they set up?

Also, why did Trump even bring up how great Sadam Hussain was at killing terrorists?  Of course, for Sadam anyone who opposed him was a terrorist.

 

I heard that there are currently 3,000 ISIS members on death row in Iraq.  And Trump tries to say that Obama and Clinton are so soft that they are inviting them to America as refugees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how long it will take the Republicans in Senate and House to set up committees to investigate FBI director James Comey?  Next question, how many committees will they set up?

Also, why did Trump even bring up how great Sadam Hussain was at killing terrorists?  Of course, for Sadam anyone who opposed him was a terrorist.

 

Once the Dems win back the Senate there will be no more Senate investigating committees wasting tax payer dollars.....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poppy Bush was the king of 'lost' documents.  He clawed back a huge amount for his Presidential Library where they are kept out of sight from the public and safe from freedom of information requests. The Bush's aren't called the Family of Secrets for nothing.  That CIA training stood him in good stead.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what Charlton Heston is laughing about.

 

I always have the impression all those laughers that are posted at the end of some of these posts are laughing at the poster who posted the post. One who posts with such regularity the likes of Horrorweetz and Bullllllllllllllcannnnnon, and lean and hungry Annie who have been partisan hacks for decades. One who fears to post the likes of some observer who smacks of some even-handedness and truth, and fairness who might even have something good to say about Donnybrook and perhaps even provide a bit of enlightenment on Donnybrook's peculiar person, but no that's not good enough, to much fairness, to much light to hateful eyes, no bring on the tired old perennial nasties who must be on script and spew something that has some relish of hate in it, and to a choir that doesn't even exist, not here anyway (two or three persons do not a choir make). No wonder Heston laughs.

 

:lol:

Anybody who is familiar with Horowitz's work can see what a

right wing loony tune he is. He makes many of the other wingnuts

look almost sane. He went from being a hard core Trotskyite to

a right wing kook with no stops in between. As nutty as they

come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

?????????????

 

I believe it has to do with her dealings with foreign agents who give vast amounts of money to her "Foundation".

 

I was gonna recommend you ask her personally - but you can't trust a word she says to be true, so I'm not sure it would do you any good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

?????????????

 

Because HRC is lazy and entitled.    She did what was convenient for her and her staff. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it has to do with her dealings with foreign agents who give vast amounts of money to her "Foundation".

 

I was gonna recommend you ask her personally - but you can't trust a word she says to be true, so I'm not sure it would do you any good..

 

...as if she would deign to give us the time of day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it's started.  The Republicans are going to subject Director Comey to an interrogation in both the House and Senate.  Hopefully, McConnell and Ryan will limit it to one committee per chamber and that will be it.

Of course, they will drag it out until late October to make sure their "findings" have most detrimental effect possible on election.

While Clinton is not blameless, there are millions of people and thousands of corporate and government exectutives (including military and intelligence) who assume their IT people know whereof they speak when say: the system is secure.  How many government and corporate systems have been hacked - and how many have we never heard about?

Do wew really know that the DOS system would have been any more secure?  Part of problem is that everyone uses too many devices with too easy access to various systems.

Bottom line is that she should not have done it, but there is no "criminal" act.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

© 2020 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
×
×
  • Create New...