victorkong Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 In the Week 1 module, Richard notes that film scholar Don Crafton describes gags of early slapstick serving "as as a source of narrative 'excess'". In other words, gags tend to be breaks from the plot and traditionally storytelling, intending to be used just for exaggerated humor. What I'm wondering is if there have been gags, either in early slapstick or present-day, where they were crucial and pivotal to the progression of narrative--where the plot simply wouldn't drive forward without the execution of said gags? Buster Keaton--perhaps?--whose gags tend to be forces of nature outside his control, and which very often sets off the circumstances of the rest of his films. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkbrenna Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 I think "One Week" moves the plot forward with Keaton. It has a beginning, a middle and an end, with gags included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 In improvisational comedy, a gag is defined precisely as an attempt at humour that doesn't develop naturally from the narrative. http://improvencyclopedia.org/glossary//Gagging.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martha S. Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 I guess in "One Week" you could say the gags are the plot. Or you could say that they do interrupt the plot, since he's never successful at getting the piano into his house. And it looks like he's not even successful in building the house, since it's all off kilter and then gets further destroyed by Buster cutting a hole in it, holes being made in the roof, etc. I think I option #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts