JackFavell Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 kingrat - Port of Shadows hit me like a ton of bricks too. It's just a great movie! I realize looking at my list today that I should have put it higher, but I was moving films up and down, and it kind of got forgotten in a spot lower than I wanted it. I'd probably put it in at number 7 or even higher. I just have great love for the top 7 movies on my list so it's hard to rank it above those old faves. I can totally see how your ratings work. The movies you chose are probably ordered from best films to worst, at least in groups. You have great taste. I have a weird mix of old faves and new ones, and it makes my list rather scattered. In the thirties, I tend to like comedies best, although there are some dramas too that really grab me. It's just that the list skews more toward comedy (usually with something important to say, but still comedy). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankGrimes Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Good evening, Spunky -- *That actually bugs me too, so I totally understand. I am a more out-of-the-box thinker anyway, maybe because I am a classic film watcher. It's definitely not your run of the mill thing to do, and it defines me in a way that not much else does. Anyway, I think dreamers are looked down on, generally speaking, by the majority of people. They are 'weird' or 'different', so I get a lot of people, some of whom are nice in every other way, telling me that the things I think are 'weird'. This is about the only place I feel I can say what I think without getting told how to be different from who I am.* I'd agree with you, dreamers are looked down upon. I can understand why. The world is about doing. Dreaming tends to be more of a private, personal thing. And what does dreaming really get you unless you apply it? *Yes, but there is nothing I've done in my life that I can't talk about. I couldn't be blackmailed. I'm not proud of everything I've done, some of it was stupid, but I am not ashamed of anything I've done. I'm more ashamed of who I am inside (though less and less over the years). This is why I love Curse of the Cat People. I am Ann Carter. I don't understand others, and they don't understand me. Imagine her growing up different like that, still believing in imaginary friends... that's me, though I learned my lesson over time, don't reveal that softness.* All of that is terribly interesting. Some people like to shove their "different" in people's faces. There's an insecurity to that. You look to secretly guard your different. You're very much an "interior" woman. You're protective and you don't like confrontation. *Blanche Dubois is another character I can relate to strongly. I'm a tender person on the inside, I have nothing to hide but that tenderness.* Now this is one I wouldn't expect. Blanche is someone who is holding onto the past, so she is living behind a serious facade. She's full of vanity. Blanche is a very fragile woman, for sure. *same here. I've always felt we were alike. The ramblers here I can really feel a kinship to because I know you all won't hurt me.* I feel we do share some similarities. I'm similar to everyone here in some shape or form. And I'm talking personality. But my overall view of life is probably closest with you. *Only every once in a while do you put out the spikes! I think you are more about pushing to get me to fess up to my weirdness cause it's really not bad.* I'd hope you'd know I wouldn't intentionally look to upset you. And I'd hope you'd feel comfortable to disagree with me. *But on the other hand, they are alone together now. They need one another to talk to. And they have shared experience. Very powerful for bringing them together.* You are right about that. But the key is wanting to come together and to do so with the idea of finding a togetherness. That needs to be the desire. *Gosh, you could have just described me! Except for the big game. I do need quiet time, but maybe it's because I don't have the outlet of talking much anymore. None of my friends here are talkers.* None? Really? That's tough. But I'm in a similar position. Much of it is my own doing, however. You and the other "Ramblers" have given me a wonderful outlet, and much more. I'm learning a lot because of you all. And not just about classic film. *It can be romantic to take charge. Look at Lisa Fremont!* I'm looking! I'm looking! I'm definitely a "Jeff." *Being pursued is great. Pursuing can be great too. It's day to day living that's hard.* You know what? You just solved a riddle with myself. It's the day-to-day where I would be good. It's the start that's my issue. And that definitely makes me more of a "Charles" than a "Rosy." Rosy is all about the start. *Well.....maybe. I do like silents a lot. But I haven't seen nearly as many as most of the guys who hang out down in the silents forum.* But isn't that their primary focus? You're watching all kinds of films. *Wow! I'm so surprised that Robin Hood came in so high! I thought you didn't like it. Or is it that you hate the thirties a lot? * I mostly liked *The Adventures of Robin Hood*. I just don't like it as much as others do. *I think you will, but sporadically. He directed a lot, but only a few of his films really exhibit his personality. The others are either less well done, due to inferior actors and scripts, or they are just work jobs.* Walsh is the adventure director, to me. I feel he's at his best doing such films. *Me too! It's funny, he's so multi-dimensional when you really look at his work, very very.... vulnerable, actually. It's surprising.* When John Wayne shows vulnerability, I feel he really does lift a picture to another level. And you are right, I've been surprised to see the variety of peformances and films by Duke. *Yes, he's the ancestor of the modern day Donat. So it's a double role. In fact, he competes against his ancestor for the lady's heart.* Hmmmmm, sounds interesting. *You should take a look one more time. It's hilarious how he acts. But very different. I only noticed him in the film recently and was very surprised at what he does. It's very different from Yosemite Sam. * I do remember his being very quiet, but I can't say that I remember much of the comedy with him. *Maybe it was movieman who saw it or Molo? I distinctly remember you watching it though.* What's going on around here?! You and Miss G are both distinctly remembering me watching films I've never seen! *They've been faring a lot better with me lately. Probably because I am running out of movies that interest me, or maybe I am just old enough to understand that war movies aren't always about war... like westerns they can delve into other situations, like racism or love or power.* I've been learning the same. The "rah rah" won't get me, but the ones that feature good emotion and psychological depth will usually register well with me. *I'm actually reading the most interesting book right now about the Civil War, by Shelby Foote. He really captures the panache of all the different generals and commanders, their strengths and weaknesses. It's a pretty brilliant story of completely different individuals and what brings them down and what makes them stronger in battle than their opponent. It's not always brilliance or tactics that makes a man a leader, it can be something else, their spirit or fire, or often it's just a slow comfortable way of being with his men. It kind of reminds me sometimes of They Were Expendable, the war was a lot of sitting around waiting..* That does sound like a very good read. It's that kind of depth that will pull me in. So how did you come to choose such a book? *I didn't mind the happy ending at all, it was done well. But for me the music and something about the initial concept didn't work. If she had been a prostitute it would have seemed less contrived. It felt like they were trying to do everything to keep her from looking like she was bad. Then suddenly she gets a job? So what if she's a torch singer? I know the times were different, but her numbers didn't seem racy enough to warrant the reaction they got. Also I think the direction was a little slow? maybe. I'm not sure. How did you like it?* I liked the first half of the film, but once the radio program becomes a plea by "Aunt Jenny" (Claudette Colbert), it loses me. I did think Claudette was quite good. It's clearly her film. I didn't mind the shorthand for "morally-loose woman." I could see the shock of a torch singer being the star of children's program. And Sally (Claudette Colbert) was getting a big kick out of the irony. She was basically taunting the producers and even her audience. *Why me, in particular? I'm just curious.* You, more than anyone else, respond to the visual look of a film, and I felt you'd really like *Le Plaisir* for the camerawork. Also, you are more open to tales of "loose women," Denver. *Le Plaisir* is not a film for Quiet Gal, and probably not Movieman. Fordy Guns would like some of it, particularly the style, but not the entire film. The stories and themes are not "her." *I've also recently read some de Maupassant stories. He's really brilliant at bringing out the true hypocritical nature of human beings, it's just the way we are. I swear, one of the stories I read was the basic idea of Stagecoach !* I never heard of him until very recently. See how far ahead of me you are! *The middle one is really a masterpiece. There is so much in it, it makes you want to go back and watch it again right away. The way the girls bring life to the community, and pretty much any place they are.. they are the vitality that beauty and most of all openness can bring to a place. Their very real emotion and feelings and basic kindliness were contagious... the entire community actually benefited from their presence, no matter what community. I also liked the unspoken things between Rosa and the father, Gabin, that remained unspoken. Very nicely done.* But what they do isn't morally right. Would you like your husband to visit their place? That's why I found the story to be very interesting. On one hand, the ladies are exactly what you say. They bring life to the hum-drum town. The businessmen look forward to their encounters with these ladies. And once they leave, these men and the town are a wreck. They don't know what to do with themselves. They are worried these ladies are gone for good. And then to see these ladies on their one-day holiday was wonderful. They are all at ease. They all seem to enjoy themselves being "one of many." Some experience the spiritual. It's completely ironic when you consider how these ladies would normally be received in such a place. *They don't even realize their effect on people, which is so radical.* That's a really good point. I'm not sure many people know their effect on others because we rarely verbalize it. How many people tell others, "you make me feel good"? *That's very good, I never thought about that. To me it's the way Ophuls films emotion catching from one to another then all around the church, It's wonderful, I can't think of anyone else who could film something so ephemeral.* You're so right. Ophuls' moving camera is perfect for capturing such feelings. *I was a bit confused by the first story. It didn't really seem to go anywhere, but then, does it have to? It's really just another riff on the theme of Pleasure.* I liked "Le Masque" the most. The fight with age, the seeking of past pleasure is such a universal feeling. The masked man (Jean Galland) still wishes he were young and could do the things he used to do. To him, youth is pleasure. Then there is his wife (Gaby Morlay). She is comfortable with who she is and where she is, yet she completely understands her husband's war. The story is such a stylish truth. It's a loving story. *I loved the voice over by de Maupassant, who I thought was the artist friend in the last section of the film... was he? Or was the friend a different character altogether? I wasn't quite clear on that.* Yes, Jean Servais plays the friend and is the voice of Guy in "Le Modele." *I guess what I liked best was the way that pleasure was portrayed as multifaceted - it is both fleeting and something more deeply meaningful to us than we realize.* That's lovely. I loved seeing the different takes on pleasure. The desiring of a past pleasure. A communal pleasure. Spiritual pleasure. The pleasure of being with a woman. The pleasure of a vacation, albeit a short one. The pleasure of finding love. And then there's the great pain that comes with the losing of such pleasures. *I wonder if Ophuls was making a statement about film-making itself through this movie? that the people who bring pleasure are important to society?There is also the hint that the seeking of pleasure can be dangerous to the soul, as in the first and last sections. What's your take on them? I'm especially curious about the last one, how does that relate to pleasure? Is pain a pleasure?* Oh, I'm sure Ophuls could relate to the pleasures and pains of filmmaking. Evidently the final story was to be a different one but the producer didn't allow for more funds, so Ophuls had to scrap the story and go with "Le Modele." I do feel as if "Le Modele" is about pain being not that far behind pleasure. Is it a pleasure? For some, it is. But I don't feel as if the final story is about that. I feel it's about acquiring things only to find out they don't bring you the pleasure you thought it would. Very ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxgirl48 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 You're on the right track with Tom Kennedy, Jackie, but no, and then I thought Harry Bellaver, but he's not it, either, so, my search continues... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxgirl48 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 >I get all those square-jawed "mugs" confused---but love them all! I think the idea of that TV series is great, Bronxie. Maybe Paul Douglas could be a regular guest star? And the Nortons and Cramdens their neighbors. > Yes, I could see Paul dropping by! As well as Ralph and Alice and Ed and Trixie, lol. ("What the world needs now...") Oh my gosh, Goddess, I cannot tell you how much I adored Dan in CHICAGO CALLING! Even the kid was (fairly) tolerable, considering how necessary he was to the narrative with its themes of redemption, second chances, the nature of morality, etc. I did indeed see echos of neo-realism, specifically as you mentioned, THE BICYCLE THIEF. Not a false note in Duryea's performance, and he lifts the material above the usual cloying, moralising '50's Hollywood fare. Think of it -- Dan Duryea acting alongside a young boy and a cute dog, but there's nary a sickeningly sweet moment between any of them! I only got up to part 3 of THE BURGLAR but will watch the rest tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxgirl48 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I just found HEAVEN WITH A BARBED WIRE FENCE on YouTube and am so thrilled! I can't believe Ricardo Cortez is the director! Plus a young Glenn Ford and Richard Conte, oh, joy! I'll make it a double bill this evening with the rest of THE BURGLAR. Mom was watching THE DELICATE DELINQUENT this afternoon (she enjoyed Pierre Etaix, by the way) and didn't care for Lewis solo. "He was better with Dean Martin". She asked me the inevitable question: "Are they alive?" and had to update her about Dean... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Richard Conte really does a GREAT job here. Wonderful. Dang! I was hoping Tom Kennedy was the one. I'll have to see if I can think of any more mugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxgirl48 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Can't wait! (even though Conte always leaves me feeling off kilter; like Charles Bickford, you never know when he's going to kiss you or bust you in the chops) I had my first exposure to Richard in I'LL CRY TOMORROW, so you can understand, lol. Thanks for joining me on the mug hunt, Jackie! I've simply got to nail him down! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I never liked Conte precisely because that was my first movie introduction too. He's really good in this one though. I'm checking my classic movie mug shots! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankGrimes Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Hi, Kingrat -- *{font:Calibri}I haven’t seen that many of Frank’s 1938 films, and I always struggle with numbering a list, but here goes:{font}* You listed 18 films. Is that how many you have seen from that list? I've seen 19. I would be surprised to find out I've actually seen more than you from the list, albeit just one. I really liked how you categorized what films you've seen. That was great. {font:Times New Roman} {font} {font:Calibri} {font}*{font:Calibri}Candidate for all-time favorites list:{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}1. Port of Shadows{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* That just convinced me to watch it in the next group. {font:Calibri} {font} {font:Times New Roman} {font}*{font:Calibri}Among the best of the year, in no real order:{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}2. Jezebel (Wyler’s great direction, Bette at her best){font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}3. Alexander Nevsky (haven’t seen this in decades; it might fall on a second viewing){font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}4. La bête humaine{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}5. The Lady Vanishes{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}6. Bringing Up Baby{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}7. The Adventures of Robin Hood{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* *{font:Calibri}8. Pygmalion{font}* *{font:Times New Roman} {font}* Those are the biggies. I'm impressed by you and Jackie having seen *Alexander Nevsky*. {font:Calibri}{font} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankGrimes Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Hola, Miss G -- *From the 1938 list of the ones you have not seen, I'd definitely recommend Jezebel though I can't see you liking it much. Thank heavens it has George Brent in a surprisingly "Rhett Butler" type role. Fonda's character makes Ashley Wilkes look like...Rhett Butler. * Fonda is that bad?! Oh, no! Is George Brent as good in this one as he is in *The Rains Came* ? *I can't say any of the others (that you haven't seen) thrill me. The foreign ones I have not yet seen.* How many have you seen, altogether? What are the three highest placing films you haven't seen? *If you are looking for more to watch I found yet another little "sweet"* *film, unexpectedly, on YouTube. It has the boring title Chicago* *Calling (1951), so it's no wonder I never saw it. It was only when I* *caught Dan Duryea's name attached that I figured I would give it shot,* *in case it was an underrated film noir like The Burglar, in which he* *was so brilliant. He continues to amaze me with his depth as a really* * feeling actor. He broke my heart in this little "B" movie which* *could have been more aptly titled: Did You Ever Have One of* *Those Days?. It is something in the vein of It's a Wonderful Life* *and even Heaven With a Barbed Wire Fence, in that you find* *humanity and friendship in unexpected people and ways. The ending* *had me bawling. I recommend this little movie to all the Ramblers* *here....I think Jackie and Rohanaka would like it, too. (Bronxie, I have* *to warn you, there is a little boy in it, lol....however it is not all* *sweetness and lite).* It certainly isn't all sweet and light! It's an unpredictable one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > I'd agree with you, dreamers are looked down upon. I can understand why. The world is about doing. Dreaming tends to be more of a private, personal thing. And what does dreaming really get you unless you apply it? You remind me of the teacher in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. > All of that is terribly interesting. Some people like to shove their "different" in people's faces. There's an insecurity to that. You look to secretly guard your different. You're very much an "interior" woman. You're protective and you don't like confrontation. I'll say! And yet I think of myself as outgoing and friendly. > Now this is one I wouldn't expect. Blanche is someone who is holding onto the past, so she is living behind a serious facade. She's full of vanity. Blanche is a very fragile woman, for sure. I am holding on to the past, it's just someone else's! The classic film past. I am a bit vain, but I try to contain it or control it. I'm not the best looking woman around, but dang, I'd say I wasn't bad looking. Now as I age, I see what I had that I didn't realize was good! My mom was very pretty, but she never made a big deal out of it. I'd say she was a Jackie Kennedy-Onassis type. One who thought more of inner quality than outer. So I've always thought it was wrong to care too much about how you look. It created quite a problem for me when I was younger, made me feel guilty for taking too much time with myself, even though I did. So no, in that way, I'm no Blanche. But Blanche's inner fear, her wish for kindness and beauty, well that I can relate to strongly. Like Lost Horizon, I'm looking for a world where people would 'be kind'. > I'd hope you'd know I wouldn't intentionally look to upset you. And I'd hope you'd feel comfortable to disagree with me. I do know that. And I do feel comfortable enough to disagree. I just hope I'm not too snippy or obnoxious when I do! > You are right about that. But the key is wanting to come together and to do so with the idea of finding a togetherness. That needs to be the desire. And we don't really know that... darn it! I need resolution. Though I'm sure they stay and grow together. But then, I'm the deluded Blanche type.... > None? Really? That's tough. But I'm in a similar position. Much of it is my own doing, however. You and the other "Ramblers" have given me a wonderful outlet, and much more. I'm learning a lot because of you all. And not just about classic film. Oh, I have friends who talk. But it's not the kind of talk I mean. I like to have in depth discussions, like here. Or talk about the things you love. I really miss the theatre people I used to hang out with. They loved to talk about all sorts of profound or not so profound things. All I hear about anymore are the kids and the school and husbands and what TV show someone is watching. Or aches and pains, or parents who don't measure up. No artistic feelings, or creative drive or even dreaminess among these friends. > I'm looking! I'm looking! I'm definitely a "Jeff." Ha! I guess so. I don't think you are as negatve as Jeff. So would you say that Jeff is the male equivalent of Blanche Dubois? Do you think he will be able to make a relationship with Lisa? Will his negativity be too much in the end? > You know what? You just solved a riddle with myself. It's the day-to-day where I would be good. It's the start that's my issue. And that definitely makes me more of a "Charles" than a "Rosy." Rosy is all about the start. I see. But isn't the problem that most Charles's are drawn to Rosy's? I think sometimes the day to day are attracted to the starters, and the starters are attracted to the day by day people of the world. When the attraction dries up, what's left? > But isn't that their primary focus? You're watching all kinds of films. I do like to mix it up. > I mostly liked *The Adventures of Robin Hood*. I just don't like it as much as others do. OK. > Walsh is the adventure director, to me. I feel he's at his best doing such films. I would agree. Though I just watched his first big silent film, called *Regeneration*. It had all the Walsh keynotes in it. It had unrequited love, a leading woman who was just a bit more interesting than the average heroine, a big canvas for a setting, and a tough hero with some sensitivity built in. It was a straight drama, but the best scenes were ones of fighting and action. Or suspense. No one can build up to a big finish like Walsh. > I do remember his being very quiet, but I can't say that I remember much of the comedy with him. It isn't very overt. There are so many other things in the movie that get direct attention. And yet he impressed me. But only after seeing it about a million times! > What's going on around here?! You and Miss G are both distinctly remembering me watching films I've never seen! Are you SURE you've never seen them? Cmon! > I've been learning the same. The "rah rah" won't get me, but the ones that feature good emotion and psychological depth will usually register well with me. I don't mind the rah rah, as long as I can put it into historical context. Patriotic I have affection for. Propaganda is OK if it's about pulling together for the good of our country. Talking about the japs or the krauts makes me wince. Pure racial hatred I can't take, unless it's to make a point about racism. I can't really tell where I draw the line. I only know it when I see it. Maybe I should try to get through Back to Bataan when you watch it. if I can find it on youtube or Netflix. Ugh. why did I just say I'd watch a war movie? > That does sound like a very good read. It's that kind of depth that will pull me in. So how did you come to choose such a book? I watched the Ken Burns Civil War documentary again recently. It was just as good this time as when it came out. Shelby Foote was one of the experts who talked about certain battles and feelings that people had during the war. He's got a wonderful voice and a very southern colloquial way of telling a story, with humor. he's smart but hides it under a relaxed down home manner. He's fair, more a historian than a partisan. He comes at history with a flair. I remembered he had written several books, some history books, some novels. I wanted to read his voice, and dig a little deeper into the Civil War. I have caught MissG's love of Lincoln as well in the last few months, reading his speeches. So I got Foote's history book. He writes it like a novel or a series of short stories. It's very entertaining because he delineates character. He just tells a good story with flourish. > I liked the first half of the film, but once the radio program becomes a plea by "Aunt Jenny" (Claudette Colbert), it loses me. I did think Claudette was quite good. It's clearly her film. Yeah, I like the first half better too now that you mention it. I like the grit of it. > I didn't mind the shorthand for "morally-loose woman." I could see the shock of a torch singer being the star of children's program. And Sally (Claudette Colbert) was getting a big kick out of the irony. She was basically taunting the producers and even her audience. I liked that part. I just thought that the reactions to her were too severe. Not about the radio show, which I could understand, but the other reactions, just to her name being mentioned. > You, more than anyone else, respond to the visual look of a film, and I felt you'd really like *Le Plaisir* for the camerawork. Also, you are more open to tales of "loose women," Denver. *Le Plaisir* is not a film for Quiet Gal, and probably not Movieman. Fordy Guns would like some of it, particularly the style, but not the entire film. The stories and themes are not "her." That's funny! I'm open to loose women! :D I did like the stories, they were different than any we would have over here in America. Boy I wish I could sit down and have talked to Ophuls. I'd love to know why he picked these stories and how he visualized his films. > I never heard of him until very recently. See how far ahead of me you are! Naw. I was just always weird, you see! I actually liked the classics. > But what they do isn't morally right. Would you like your husband to visit their place? That's why I found the story to be very interesting. On one hand, the ladies are exactly what you say. They bring life to the hum-drum town. The businessmen look forward to their encounters with these ladies. And once they leave, these men and the town are a wreck. They don't know what to do with themselves. They are worried these ladies are gone for good. No I wouldn't like my husband to visit, but if I was pleasing him then maybe he wouldn't want to go. If I were the type of woman whose husband was frequenting the place, maybe he would come back in a better mood, so it's good for everyone. > And then to see these ladies on their one-day holiday was wonderful. They are all at ease. They all seem to enjoy themselves being "one of many." Some experience the spiritual. It's completely ironic when you consider how these ladies would normally be received in such a place. And this is what I found most charming about the story. > That's a really good point. I'm not sure many people know their effect on others because we rarely verbalize it. How many people tell others, "you make me feel good"? No one. > I liked "Le Masque" the most. The fight with age, the seeking of past pleasure is such a universal feeling. The masked man (Jean Galland) still wishes he were young and could do the things he used to do. To him, youth is pleasure. Then there is his wife (Gaby Morlay). She is comfortable with who she is and where she is, yet she completely understands her husband's war. The story is such a stylish truth. It's a loving story. I loved the wife's reaction too. > Yes, Jean Servais plays the friend and is the voice of Guy in "Le Modele." I liked him. Have you seen him in anything else? I should see what other movies he was in. I know the name but can't quite figure out why, > Oh, I'm sure Ophuls could relate to the pleasures and pains of filmmaking. Evidently the final story was to be a different one but the producer didn't allow for more funds, so Ophuls had to scrap the story and go with "Le Modele." I didn't know that. How frustrating! Still, he did an amazing job, for his second best pick. > I do feel as if "Le Modele" is about pain being not that far behind pleasure. Is it a pleasure? For some, it is. But I don't feel as if the final story is about that. I feel it's about acquiring things only to find out they don't bring you the pleasure you thought it would. Very ironic. Yes, that sounds right. he was too quick to grasp at pleasure, mistaking it for an eternal love with this young woman, and because of his mistake they lost everything. Their pleasure became twisted, to see the other hurt... but it went top far. I don't really think it was their pleasure to hurt one another, but they were caught in a dance, kind of like the beginning story. > > > > > I guess not. Or maybe it is? Is life even about happiness? Can one grasp happiness and keep it going, or is it something so fleeting that it slips through our grasp before we realize it's over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
movieman1957 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Re: Happiness: I guess not. Or maybe it is? Is life even about happiness? Can one grasp happiness and keep it going, or is it something so fleeting that it slips through our grasp before we realize it's over? If life isn't about happiness or even contenment than what is it about? I'm not sure you can chase it down. How wonderful if you can fall into it. However, I fear it is more that it is fleeting and the worst of it being that you didn't know you were happy while you were in the middle of it. Because something always comes along....at least for me. We were never promised it though. End of sermon. (wonderful chat you two are having.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > {quote:title=movieman1957 wrote:}{quote}Re: Happiness: > If life isn't about happiness or even contenment than what is it about? I'm not sure you can chase it down. How wonderful if you can fall into it. However, I fear it is more that it is fleeting and the worst of it being that you didn't know you were happy while you were in the middle of it. Because something always comes along....at least for me. > > > We were never promised it though. > > > End of sermon. (wonderful chat you two are having.) > Thanks Chris! Gosh, you have completely grasped what this movie seems to be saying. We chase happiness and yet it's something that we sometimes don't even know we have when we have it. It's such a weird intangible thing. Ophuls films the intangibles That's what makes him fascinating. He always opts to film what happens in between people, what crosses through the air when they speak or look at one another. It's funny, so many directors film words or movement, not thought or emotion, And here I am happy now...discussing with my friends... and it's time to go to bed. Darn! happiness IS fleeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
movieman1957 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I guess I should watch the movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGoddess Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 >> I watched the Ken Burns Civil War documentary again recently. It was just as good this time as when it came out. Shelby Foote was one of the experts who talked about certain battles and feelings that people had during the war. He's got a wonderful voice and a very southern colloquial way of telling a story, with humor. he's smart but hides it under a relaxed down home manner. He's fair, more a historian than a partisan. He comes at history with a flair. I remembered he had written several books, some history books, some novels. I wanted to read his voice, and dig a little deeper into the Civil War. I have caught MissG's love of Lincoln as well in the last few months, reading his speeches. So I got Foote's history book. He writes it like a novel or a series of short stories. It's very entertaining because he delineates character. He just tells a good story with flourish. I loved the civil war documentary...i even bought it for my mother, who is a civil war buff. what i was most touched by was the readings from the all the letters, especially those by ordinary people. and you make me want to read that book now, too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGoddess Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > Fonda is that bad?! Oh, no! Is George Brent as good in this one as he is in *The Rains Came* ? > Better, I think. I believe you will like George in this one, though he does not have a huge amount of screen time. Yet there is something rather "Tom Doniphon" about his character. It's my favorite GB role. Fonda is extremely ill at ease. He's "Ranse", ha. There is one very funny scene between Fonda and Bette involving a riding crop, lol. And Bette really is terrific in her role, it's her show all the way. I just love watching George watching her with amusement. > How many have you seen, altogether? What are the three highest placing films you haven't seen? > Definitely *Port of Shadows* is the biggest that I most want to see. I know I've added it to my ClassicFlix "queue". I love how Gabin and Morgan look in that one, so typically "French" from that era. After that, I know I have to watch Eisenstein one day, lol, it's just the LENGTH of those movies and the settings really put me off. But he adored John Ford so I should not be so banal about movies like *Nevsky*. I haven't seen *The Bakers Wife* or *Hotel du Nord*, either. It takes a lot for me to watch a foreign movie these days. Haven't seen *Topper Takes a Trip* but I'm not into those movies, either. I'm not that into "ghosts", humorous or otherwise. I never heard of *Blond Cheat*, I wonder why it's rated so high. Same with *Child Bride* and *Five of a Kind*. *Blondie* was a hugely favorite series when I was a kid. I think I would not be able to stand it now, lol. *Four Daughters* is interesting, mainly because it introduces us to John Garfield. This movie was remade with Frank Sinatra and Doris Day as *Young at Heart*, which I kind of prefer---not because it's necessarily better, but because Doris and Frank (and Jack Carson) are so good in it. The weird thing about *Young at Heart* is that Frank looks and acts as if he were in an entirely different movie---a film noir, while the rest of the cast is in a bright, shiny musical, lol. The original is much more cohesive and natural overall. All my "cousins" are in it, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGoddess Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > Oh my gosh, Goddess, I cannot tell you how much I adored Dan in CHICAGO CALLING! Even the kid was (fairly) tolerable, considering how necessary he was to the narrative with its themes of redemption, second chances, the nature of morality, etc. this is great news! i can never be sure how odd films like this will go over with others. i certainly did not know what to expect. as i said earlier, dan duryea has really grown in my esteem, he's not just talented, he's very touching and i was surprised by that from a "tough guy" who often played sneering or sniveling types. > I did indeed see echos of neo-realism, specifically as you mentioned, THE BICYCLE THIEF. Not a false note in Duryea's performance, and he lifts the material above the usual cloying, moralising '50's Hollywood yes, it had an almost documentary feel to certain moments, i thought it felt like a very personal film. i don't even remember who directed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I cried and cried watching that Ken Burns documentary. You are right, it's the little people's words that are so moving. The book is pretty much a bird's eye view of the start of the war and then the military battles. It's called The Civil War: A Narrative, Vol. 1. Heaven help me if I finish it! I'm a little over halfway through and am feeling very proud of myself. I doubt I'll ever get to Vol. 2! Foote goes back and forth between the different leaders, describing them, and making them seem real. I'm not crazy about the descriptions of the battles themselves, though he's pretty clear explaining them (even to someone as clueless as me! I can't even find my way around my own home town, much less a battlefield in Virginia) but every one of the military men is such a hoot to read about that he makes it interesting. They had personality back then. I can't wait for you to get Port of Shadows! It really snuck up on me, I didn't know anything about it. It's a pretty perfect film, and seems way ahead in terms of when it was made. This one and Gueule d'Amour are my favorite Gabin films so far. They are both extremely adult to me, and a bit noirish without hitting you over the head with it. it's definitely a precursor to our 40's films. The french were so far beyond us! Gabin reminds me of Bogie in this film, his character does anyway. I know how you feel about Nevsky and the Ivans. They are just so gorgeous though, I just let the images wash over me. You can't possibly get everything from it, especially reading subs along with it, so eventually I just sit back and let go. If you tried to glean every little thing from the symbolism I think you'd explode! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGoddess Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > {quote:title=JackFavell wrote:}{quote}I cried and cried watching that Ken Burns documentary. You are right, it's the little people's words that are so moving. > what also struck me about their letters is how extraordinarily fine their writing was---I mean so expressive and so literate. i really wept over a lot of those letters. These are the regular folks I'm talking about---they expressed themselves far better than academic professors do today, lol. and these were the days of limited education. oh, brother! > The book is pretty much a bird's eye view of the start of the war and then the military battles. It's called The Civil War: A Narrative, Vol. 1. Heaven help me if I finish it! I'm a little over halfway through and am feeling very proud of myself. I doubt I'll ever get to Vol. 2! > hmmm...i wonder if i should look for those for my mother. she would probably love them. > Foote goes back and forth between the different leaders, describing them, and making them seem real. I'm not crazy about the descriptions of the battles themselves, though he's pretty clear explaining them (even to someone as clueless as me! I can't even find my way around my own home town, much less a battlefield in Virginia) but every one of the military men is such a hoot to read about that he makes it interesting. They had personality back then. > i would probably skip the battle passages, ha! > I can't wait for you to get Port of Shadows! It really snuck up on me, I didn't know anything about it. It's a pretty perfect film, and seems way ahead in terms of when it was made. This one and Gueule d'Amour are my favorite Gabin films so far. They are both extremely adult to me, and a bit noirish without hitting you over the head with it. it's definitely a precursor to our 40's films. The french were so far beyond us! Gabin reminds me of Bogie in this film, his character does anyway. > i do get all of that just from the trailer...and Gabin looks incredibly appealing. i look forward to it! > I know how you feel about Nevsky and the Ivans. They are just so gorgeous though, I just let the images wash over me. You can't possibly get everything from it, especially reading subs along with it, so eventually I just sit back and let go. If you tried to glean every little thing from the symbolism I think you'd explode! > i'm sure of that. he was so influential and not without reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGoddess Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 if you didn't have it, i found #32 on your list here *the terror of tiny town* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hv8lRdiLwo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 > {quote:title=MissGoddess wrote:}{quote} > what also struck me about their letters is how extraordinarily fine their writing was---I mean so expressive and so literate. i really wept over a lot of those letters. These are the regular folks I'm talking about---they expressed themselves far better than academic professors do today, lol. and these were the days of limited education. oh, brother! Oh boy do you ever have that right! Their writing back home from the front is so poetic and beautiful. So evocative of pure emotion. And the women who saw it all, occupation, death, disaster, battle, starvation, well, they really put it all out there for you in their writings. What I loved the most about the series is the way that they followed certain people all the way through the war. Not generals, but foot soldiers and the rank and file. It was fascinating to me how well spoken they were and how sharp and in some ways modern their words seemed. I think that Burns must have started with those letters when he decided to make the series, I can't see how you couldn't have begun at that point. >hmmm...i wonder if i should look for those for my mother. she would probably love them. He's a wonderful writer. He captures flavors, rather than just relating dry facts. The thing is, in relating the battles, he does it through the eyes and minds of these incredibly lively and vital characters. He will set up one against the other - tell what their strategies were, how brilliant they thought they were, lol, and then tell you how it all came out.Each man's brilliance and each man's folly is given an equal hearing. It makes you want to read about the actual battles just to see how it all comes out! > i do get all of that just from the trailer...and Gabin looks incredibly appealing. i look forward to it! He really is appealing. I was so surprised, because he didn't have much effect on me in the two other films I'd seen. Now I begin to see what makes him a one-named guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankGrimes Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Good evening, Miss Gun for Hire -- *Better, I think. I believe you will like George in this one, though he does not have a huge amount of screen time. Yet there is something rather "Tom Doniphon" about his character. It's my favorite GB role.* I really like him a lot in *The Rains Came*, so if he's even better, I may like *Jezebel*. *Fonda is extremely ill at ease. He's "Ranse", ha. There is one very funny scene between Fonda and Bette involving a riding crop, lol.* Maybe I'll like him! *And Bette really is terrific in her role, it's her show all the way. I just love watching George watching her with amusement.* Bette may be the test for me. *Definitely Port of Shadows is the biggest that I most want to see. I know I've added it to my ClassicFlix "queue". I love how Gabin and Morgan look in that one, so typically "French" from that era.* I've been enjoying the majority of French films that I've seen of late, and this looks like another one I'll like. *After that, I know I have to watch Eisenstein one day, lol, it's just the LENGTH of those movies and the settings really put me off. But he adored John Ford so I should not be so banal about movies like Nevsky.* It's the setting that worries me. *I haven't seen The Bakers Wife or Hotel du Nord, either. It takes a lot for me to watch a foreign movie these days. Haven't seen Topper Takes a Trip but I'm not into those movies, either. I'm not that into "ghosts", humorous or otherwise. I never heard of Blond Cheat, I wonder why it's rated so high. Same with Child Bride and Five of a Kind.* *Blond Cheat* sounds interesting. Well, just because Joan Fontaine being described as "playful" intrigues me. *Child Bride* is an exploitation film, hence its interest. I'm surprised to see *Five of a Kind* ranking as highly. *Blondie was a hugely favorite series when I was a kid. I think I would not be able to stand it now, lol.* I'm not sure how I'd like the serial. The comic strip is all right. *Four Daughters is interesting, mainly because it introduces us to John Garfield. This movie was remade with Frank Sinatra and Doris Day as Young at Heart, which I kind of prefer---not because it's necessarily better, but because Doris and Frank (and Jack Carson) are so good in it. The weird thing about Young at Heart is that Frank looks and acts as if he were in an entirely different movie---a film noir, while the rest of the cast is in a bright, shiny musical, lol. The original is much more cohesive and natural overall. All my "cousins" are in it, too.* Frank and Doris?! What a pair they'd make! *if you didn't have it, i found #32 on your list here* *the terror of tiny town* I'm not sure I want to watch a western starring midgets. That's one of the three exploitation films in the top 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFavell Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 The Baker's Wife is Pagnol, and Pagnol is fantastique! I predict you will like it. Where did you get a copy if I might ask? I love Doris and Frank in Young at Heart. I don't know if you'll like it but I think they have great chemistry, and I really enjoy the movie. Probably more than the original. It's pretty much perfect casting. Edited by: JackFavell on Apr 24, 2013 9:30 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
movieman1957 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 what also struck me about their letters is how extraordinarily fine their writing was---I mean so expressive and so literate. i really wept over a lot of those letters. These are the regular folks I'm talking about---they expressed themselves far better than academic professors do today, lol. and these were the days of limited education. oh, brother! There is a lyricism without being overthought. It was quite natural and there was often an elegant melancholy to them, Shelby Foote was my favorite historian on the program. He has a down to earth conversational quality that teaches without the sense of lecture. My brother was so impressed he bought Foot's Civil War collection. By contrast James MacPherson has an amazing incredibly detailed book on the war but while fine as a commentator he is no Shelby Foote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankGrimes Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 *You remind me of the teacher in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.* I hope it's the good teacher! As a dreamer, I know how self-destructive it can be. *I'll say! And yet I think of myself as outgoing and friendly.* A hider can be anything. I'm on the shy side until I feel comfortable with someone. But I can be comfortable with someone and still not let them in. *I am holding on to the past, it's just someone else's! The classic film past. :DI am a bit vain, but I try to contain it or control it. I'm not the best looking woman around, but dang, I'd say I wasn't bad looking. Now as I age, I see what I had that I didn't realize was good!* Age does that to is, does it not? We'd love to have our looks of the past, even if we didn't like them at the time. I feel we all possess some vanity. I'm very self-conscious. *My mom was very pretty, but she never made a big deal out of it. I'd say she was a Jackie Kennedy-Onassis type. One who thought more of inner quality than outer. So I've always thought it was wrong to care too much about how you look. It created quite a problem for me when I was younger, made me feel guilty for taking too much time with myself, even though I did. So no, in that way, I'm no Blanche.* And I'd probably love your mom because of all of that. I like beautiful women/pretty girls, but I don't like the ones who think of themselves as beautiful/pretty. Those are the tough ones to please. *But Blanche's inner fear, her wish for kindness and beauty, well that I can relate to strongly. Like Lost Horizon, I'm looking for a world where people would 'be kind'.* Selfishness guarantees unkindness. Blanche's pride can be too much for me. I love that she's delicate and needs to be protected, but that pride is worrisome. I feel she values herself too much, even though I know so much of it is a charade. *I do know that. And I do feel comfortable enough to disagree. I just hope I'm not too snippy or obnoxious when I do!* I'm used to snippy! *And we don't really know that... darn it! I need resolution. Though I'm sure they stay and grow together.* And I've got a bad feeling about them! *Oh, I have friends who talk. But it's not the kind of talk I mean. I like to have in depth discussions, like here. Or talk about the things you love. I really miss the theatre people I used to hang out with. They loved to talk about all sorts of profound or not so profound things. All I hear about anymore are the kids and the school and husbands and what TV show someone is watching. Or aches and pains, or parents who don't measure up. No artistic feelings, or creative drive or even dreaminess among these friends.* Oh, yes... the real world. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Once again, we are similar. I do like to gossip and want to analyze people, but I also love my escapes. *Ha! I guess so. I don't think you are as negatve as Jeff. So would you say that Jeff is the male equivalent of Blanche Dubois? Do you think he will be able to make a relationship with Lisa? Will his negativity be too much in the end?* Awesome questions! And guess again! I'm very similar to "Jeff" (James Stewart), negativity and all. I think just as he does with relationships. I focus on all the reasons why a relationship will never work. And just like "Jeff," I do this while being completely in love with the woman. You just know "Jeff" is crazy about Lisa Carol (Grace Kelly). But he's right, the two of them are very different. She doesn't care, though. Will she care in time? That's always the question. "Jeff" will always gripe and grumble. If Lisa Carol continues to beam and fuss over him, their relationship would be fine. *I see. But isn't the problem that most Charles's are drawn to Rosy's? I think sometimes the day to day are attracted to the starters, and the starters are attracted to the day by day people of the world. When the attraction dries up, what's left?* You may be right. The ol', "opposites attract." The thing is, a "Charles" needs a "Rosy" more than a "Rosy" needs a "Charles." The tough thing with a "Rosy" is that it's all projection. So long as that projection is interesting and rewarding, things will be all right. Once that projection fades away, it spells trouble. *I would agree. Though I just watched his first big silent film, called Regeneration. It had all the Walsh keynotes in it. It had unrequited love, a leading woman who was just a bit more interesting than the average heroine, a big canvas for a setting, and a tough hero with some sensitivity built in. It was a straight drama, but the best scenes were ones of fighting and action. Or suspense. No one can build up to a big finish like Walsh.* I'm going to watch this and eventually reply to your post in "Rambles." I'm a sucker for unrequited love. *Are you SURE you've never seen them? Cmon! * *I don't mind the rah rah, as long as I can put it into historical context. Patriotic I have affection for. Propaganda is OK if it's about pulling together for the good of our country. Talking about the japs or the krauts makes me wince. Pure racial hatred I can't take, unless it's to make a point about racism. I can't really tell where I draw the line. I only know it when I see it. Maybe I should try to get through Back to Bataan when you watch it. if I can find it on youtube or Netflix. Ugh. why did I just say I'd watch a war movie? * It just seems like the "rah rah" kind of war films are bland and treat us as brain-washed children. I get nothing out of that. I probably won't be getting to *Back to Bataan* for a month or so. I've got two more 50s flicks for Duke before I reach the 40s. *I watched the Ken Burns Civil War documentary again recently. It was just as good this time as when it came out.* Wow! You watched it all? That's impressive. I've been trying to get through Burns' "Baseball," but I just haven't found the needed momentum to get through it all. My focus has been on film. *Shelby Foote was one of the experts who talked about certain battles and feelings that people had during the war. He's got a wonderful voice and a very southern colloquial way of telling a story, with humor. he's smart but hides it under a relaxed down home manner. He's fair, more a historian than a partisan. He comes at history with a flair. I remembered he had written several books, some history books, some novels. I wanted to read his voice, and dig a little deeper into the Civil War. I have caught MissG's love of Lincoln as well in the last few months, reading his speeches. So I got Foote's history book. He writes it like a novel or a series of short stories. It's very entertaining because he delineates character. He just tells a good story with flourish.* I know of him because of "Baseball." He's very "southern." *Yeah, I like the first half better too now that you mention it. I like the grit of it.* The opening of the film lets you know right away that you're in the world of "pre-code." Then I liked Sally's (Claudette Colbert) journey from there. It was until the last act that I just didn't go for the film anymore. *I liked that part. I just thought that the reactions to her were too severe. Not about the radio show, which I could understand, but the other reactions, just to her name being mentioned.* It was rather "easy." But, ironically, it ends up being accurate because the "Code" really did behave like those in the film. *That's funny! I'm open to loose women! * You are! You're someone who places a great deal of value on personal freedom and I feel you attach such a value with the loose women. *I did like the stories, they were different than any we would have over here in America. Boy I wish I could sit down and have talked to Ophuls. I'd love to know why he picked these stories and how he visualized his films.* He's one of the most stylish directors of all. And for him to combine such rich emotion with mesmerizing visuals makes his films works of art. I have great appreciation for him. *Naw. I was just always weird, you see! I actually liked the classics.* That is weird! *No I wouldn't like my husband to visit, but if I was pleasing him then maybe he wouldn't want to go. If I were the type of woman whose husband was frequenting the place, maybe he would come back in a better mood, so it's good for everyone. * I highly doubt that! And we men are stupid. We can love our wife but wish for the other thing from someone we don't care about. It can be a powerful urge. *I loved the wife's reaction too.* I also loved the wife in "Le Masque." *I liked him. Have you seen him in anything else? I should see what other movies he was in. I know the name but can't quite figure out why,* The only other time I've seen Jean Servais is *The Longest Day*, and I can't remember him. *Rififi* is the film he's probably best known for. I've yet to watch it. I'm due to watch it, too. I'm a fan of Jules Dassin. *I didn't know that. How frustrating! Still, he did an amazing job, for his second best pick.* Evidently they had the set built for the other story, which was to be "Paul's Mistress." *Yes, that sounds right. he was too quick to grasp at pleasure, mistaking it for an eternal love with this young woman, and because of his mistake they lost everything. Their pleasure became twisted, to see the other hurt... but it went top far. I don't really think it was their pleasure to hurt one another, but they were caught in a dance, kind of like the beginning story.* He flipped the switch on her. She went from being the center of his life to being the bane of his existence. *I guess not. Or maybe it is? Is life even about happiness? Can one grasp happiness and keep it going, or is it something so fleeting that it slips through our grasp before we realize it's over?* I do think life is about happiness. Where our failures start to mount is when we lose sight of real happiness in favor of the fleeting. What is real happiness? I feel it's spending time with those you love and care about. What do you with that time? That's where it gets tricky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts