Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

SCIENCE, NATURE, HISTORY & CULTURE


Recommended Posts

Black Wall Street was shattered 100 years ago. How the Tulsa race massacre was covered up and unearthed

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/31/black-wall-street-was-shattered-100-years-ago-how-tulsa-race-massacre-was-covered-up.html

 

A century ago, a prosperous Black neighborhood in Tulsa, Okla., perished at the hands of a violent white mob.

The Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921 killed hundreds of residents, burned more than 1,250 homes and erased years of Black success.

WHAT THE TULSA RACE MASSACRE DESTROYED

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/24/us/tulsa-race-massacre.html

 

block_ruin_toned-2000.jpg

im-343147

 

w620-9a35089b0b5c5df35a988c841324d903.jp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snow White and The Seven Dwarfs are based on real life characters.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/exploring-true-origins-snow-white-and-seven-dwarfs-004150

Margaretha von Waldeck, a German countess born to Philip IV in 1533.  At the age of 16, Margaretha was forced by her stepmother, Katharina of Hatzfeld, to move away to Brussels.

479e86d2aa648afc35a94df913e9da9c.jpg

 

The 7 dwarfs are miners were short in statue and probably malformed

Screen-Shot-2018-08-01-at-5.43.19-PM.jpg

 

Portrait of her stepmother Katharina of Hatzfeld.  Surprised that mirror didn't shatter!

250px-Ring_Katharina_von_Hatzfeld.jpg

 

The Mirror of Self Love.

Spieglein.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recalling a toy from the mid 1960's, Topper Tiger.  Don't confuse it with Tiger Joe which could not be steered.  Had wireless RC tech back then but would had made it outrageously expensive!  It was already $100.00 in 1965's dollars!  Today that is $847.79! :o

79483675_1_x.jpg?auto=webp&format=pjpg&q

1966-topper-toys-tiger-tank-remote_1_7e7

Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, hamradio said:

Recalling a toy from the mid 1960's, Topper Tiger.  Don't confuse it with Tiger Joe which could not be steered.  Had wireless RC tech back then but would had made it outrageously expensive!  It was already $100.00 in 1965's dollars!  Today that is $847.79! :o

79483675_1_x.jpg?auto=webp&format=pjpg&q

1966-topper-toys-tiger-tank-remote_1_7e7

Was this tank sold with different decals?   E.g.  the Nazi one?      

The Tiger I  was a German heavy tank of World War II that operated beginning in 1942 in Africa and in the Soviet Union, usually in independent heavy tank battalions.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, jamesjazzguitar said:

Was this tank sold with different decals?   E.g.  the Nazi one?      

The Tiger I  was a German heavy tank of World War II that operated beginning in 1942 in Africa and in the Soviet Union, usually in independent heavy tank battalions.

I don't know why Topper decided to call it that, guess the word Tiger was catchy.

There was a Tiger Cannon as well. The 1960's were a cool time to be a kid.

Starting at 5:12 time frame

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bygone days of manual changeover in projection room.  Operator is looking at the top right of screen....1st cue, start projector and raise down dowser.  2nd cue, hit change over button.

WRONG, my downtown theatre had that before it's last movie showing in 1991!

 

 

Example of cue marks 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, hamradio said:

Bygone days of manual changeover in projection room.  Operator is looking at the top right of screen....1st cue, start projector and raise down dowser.  2nd cue, hit change over button.

WRONG, my downtown theatre had that before it's last movie showing in 1991!

 

 

They meant it was the last time to use these projectors at this theater.  This was at the end of the summer season, and shortly thereafter the theater was chopped up from a large single screen auditorium into a 5 screen multiplex.  It's now a pizza restaurant.

Not many people went to the last picture show, apparently.  The house looks empty when the lights come up.

My little hometown theaters back in the 70s were on the 2nd run circuit for most movies (Jaws and Star Wars were a couple of exceptions).  All the theaters in town (totaling 7 screens, all but 2 of them in single screen configurations) were owned by a larger chain, and when they rented their films, they would distribute them to their properties in larger cities first.  Then, when those projectors had chewed them up, they sent it to their secondary houses.  I rarely saw a movie with a pristine print.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, txfilmfan said:

They meant it was the last time to use these projectors at this theater.  This was at the end of the summer season, and shortly thereafter the theater was chopped up from a large single screen auditorium into a 5 screen multiplex.  It's now a pizza restaurant.

Not many people went to the last picture show, apparently.  The house looks empty when the lights come up.

My little hometown theaters back in the 70s were on the 2nd run circuit for most movies (Jaws and Star Wars were a couple of exceptions).  All the theaters in town (totaling 7 screens, all but 2 of them in single screen configurations) were owned by a larger chain, and when they rented their films, they would distribute them to their properties in larger cities first.  Then, when those projectors had chewed them up, they sent it to their secondary houses.  I rarely saw a movie with a pristine print.

One thing I don't miss are the days of film breaks. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, hamradio said:

One thing I don't miss are the days of film breaks. 

 

Young folks don't know what they missed.  Limited distribution of prints (no openings on 3000 screens in those days), broken/spliced film, dirt & hair, scratches, and torn sprocket holes...

Link to post
Share on other sites

- PaulCraigRoberts.org - https://www.paulcraigroberts.org -

The Truth About Slavery

Posted By pcr3 On June 3, 2021 @ 6:29 am In Articles & Columns | Comments Disabled

The Truth About Slavery

Don’t look for it in black studies programs

Paul Craig Roberts

Support your website: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/pages/donate/  [1]

Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution?

Did slavery originate in the English colonies in North America in the 17th century or do its origins go back before the time of recorded history?

Is slavery racist or is it based on economic motive?

If a person wants understanding, these are important questions.

But if a person wants to engage others in emotion for the purpose of gaining preferment and its rewards, money and power, or simply to enjoy the self-righteousness of moral denunciation of one’s fellows, these questions are in the way.  The fact that these questions are never asked and are not a part of black studies programs in universities or the New York Times’ fake history project–the 1619 Project–is conclusive evidence that today slavery is an emotive word used to demonize white people and to bring preferment to black people.

Slavery is presented to American school children as something that white people did to black people.  Therefore, white people are racists and must pay in some way for the slavery of black people that ended in the US 156 years ago.  

There are so many unasked questions.  For example, how did the blacks brought to North America become slaves?  Who enslaved them?  The answer, which explodes the narrative, is that blacks were enslaved by other blacks.  

The main source of slaves for the slave trade was the black Kingdom of Dahomey.  Dahomey engaged in slave wars with other black kingdoms or tribes and became the dominant power.  

As Encyclopedia Britiannica says, “Dahomey was organized for war, not only to expand its boundaries but also to take captives as slaves. Slaves were either sold to the Europeans [or Muslims] in exchange for weapons or kept to work the royal plantations that supplied food for the army and court.” 

The socialist Karl Polanyi wrote the classic work:  Dahomey and the Slave Trade published in 1966. The book does not fit our woke time and the black studies agenda, and it is no longer available in print.  

Today Dahomey is known as Benin.  On the beach at Ouidah there is a contemporary monument, the Gate of no Return, commemorating the lives of the Africans captured by the black Kingdom of Dahomey and sold to Arabs and Europeans as slaves or traded for firearms.

In other words, the origin of black slaves was black slave traders.  

Why did European sea captains bring black slaves to North America?  The answer is that there was fertile land capable of producing profitable crops and no labor force.  Those who held land grants or charters from the English king needed labor to make the land useable.  There was no other work force.  

Slaves were brought to the US not because of racism but for economic motives. Black Africans sold other black Africans to merchants for firearms that established Dahomey’s dominance. The merchants sold the slaves as a labor force to those who held land that originated in land grants or charters from the English monarch and had no one to work it.  Slavery was established as the agricultural labor force long before the United States existed.

This brings us back to the opening question of this essay.  Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution?  Whether or not something is wrong depends on the morality of the time.  At the time the black Kingdom of Dahomey and the other blacks with whom Dahomey engaged in slave wars did not consider slavery wrong.  Neither did the Arabs who for centuries had raided European coastal towns for white slaves.  Neither did the Europeans who brought the purchased slaves to North America.  Neither did the colonists who purchased a labor force.  Neither did the original slaves, captives who themselves had fought in slave wars.

Slavery had been a fact of life for millenniums. Long before white peoples had black slaves, they had white slaves, and were themselves slaves owned by Arabs.  In the late 18th and early 19th centuries North Americans were enslaved when US merchant ships were captured by North African provinces of the Ottoman Empire.  For some years the US Congress paid large sums to ransome Americans enslaved in Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli.  President Thomas Jefferson tired of it and sent US Naval forces that captured Tripoli and broke up the practice of enslaving captured American merchant ship crews—thus in the US Marines anthem—“to the shores of Tripoli.”

Slavery was everywhere.  It was an inherited institution.  In the African slave wars, a man could begin the battle a free person and if defeated find himself a slave. A person born to slave parents knew no other life. In North America where slaves comprised the agricultural labor force, everyone was born into a society in which slavery was an established institution.  It was the result of a choice made in a distant time when there was no alternative labor force.

The American and French revolutions, as they are called, resulted in an idealism of the free autonomous person, and those affected by this ideal turned on slavery as wrong, as it seems to be under this ideal of Western Civilization.  However, it was not wrong in black Dahomey.

How one disposes of an entire labor institution and replaces it was never described by those who wanted an end to slavery in the 19th century.  Landowners owned the land and the labor.  To require them to free their slaves would be to deprive them of a large part of their capital. If they freed their work force, they would have to hire them back with wages, but after such a capital loss where would the wages come from?  Would taxpayers fund a government program to compensate owners for freeing their slaves?  These are major questions during a time period when many other major questions took precedence.  To reconfigure a country’s established institutions is an extraordinary undertaking.  The Communists attempted it in the 20th century, and did not meet with success.

Mechanization has replaced the bulk of the agricultural work force, but it wasn’t an available alternative at the time.  If it had been, what would have provided the livelihood for the freed slaves? In the end it was sharecropping, which kept the former slaves tied to the land as they had been as slaves and as medieval serfs had been tied to the land.  Instead of wages, sharecroppers shared in the ownership of the crop and the proceeds from the sale.

In the US the heavy immigration would have eventually produced a free labor force except for the fact that until the frontier was closed at the end of the 19th century, immigrants could move west and claim land they occupied.  Most prefered working their own place to working as labor for another person.

Jobs offshoring has eliminated most of the American manufacturing labor force, and those who had manufacturing jobs find themselves today with diminished living standards.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots are eliminating much of the rest of human employment.  The question of human employment in a world of automation and AI remains an evaded question, just as abolitionists evaded the question of the fate of freed slaves.  President Lincoln wanted to send them back to Africa or to a Central or South American destination.

If slavery was such an evil, why did Congress resurrect slavery with the 16th Amendment in 1909 and the states ratify it in 1913?  To understand what I mean, ask yourself what is the definition of a slave?  A slave is a person who does not own his own labor or the products of his labor. If you are subject to an income tax, you do not own your own labor.

Part of a slave’s work goes to his own maintenance.  Otherwise, if he is not fed, clothed, housed, and his health attended to, his owner loses his labor.  The rest of his labor could be appropriated by his owner to cover the cost of the slave’s purchase and to turn a profit.  For a 19th century slave in the US the tax rate was approximately 50%.  For a medieval serf, the tax rate was lower as he had less technology and therefore was less productive.  A medieval serf could not reproduce if his tax rate exceeded 30%, or such was the view years ago when I studied the medieval economy.  Unlike a slave, a serf was not bought and sold.  He was attached to the land.  Like a slave, he was taxed in terms of his labor.  The lord of the manor had use rights in the serfs’ labor, and the serfs had use rights in the land.

Formerly serfs were free farmers.  After the collapse of Roman power, they had no protection against Viking, Saracen, and Magyar raiders.  To survive they provided labor to a chieftian  who constructed a walled tower and maintained fighting men.  In the event of raids, serfs had a redoubt to which to flee for protection.  In effect, serfs paid a defense tax.  They exchanged a percentage of their labor for protection.  Serfdom became an established institution and continued long after the raids had stopped.  In England serfdom was ended by the Enclosures which stripped serfs of their use rights in land and created a free labor market.

Consider the US income tax.  When President Reagan was elected the tax rate on investment income was 70%.  The top tax rate on wages and salaries was 50%.  In other words, the privileged (mainly white) rich were taxed at the same rate as 19th century black slaves.

How is an American on whose labor the government has a claim a free man?  Clearly, he is not a free man.  We can say that there is a difference between a present day American and a slave, because the government only owns a percentage of his labor and not the person himself–unless the person does not pay his taxes, in which case he can be imprisoned and his labor hired out to private companies who pay the prison for the use of the prisoner’s labor.

The extraordinary failure to ask the relevant questions discussed in this essay has caused a racial division in the US infused with hatred.  This hatred is cultivated every day by an irresponsible media, by the Democrat Party, by the universities, by the NY Times 1619 Project, and by the critical race theory taught in public schools. Now that all this hate has been created, how do we get rid of it?  With misinformation passing as scholarly fact, how do we recover truth and escape the lies that are destroying us?

 
Share this page
 

Article printed from PaulCraigRoberts.org: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org

URL to article: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/06/03/the-truth-about-slavery/

URLs in this post:

[1] https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/pages/donate/ : https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/pages/donate/

 

Click here to print.

Copyright © 2020 PaulCraigRoberts.org. All rights reserved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah we shouldn't forget an abusive drunk whom punched Shirley out while carrying their first child Susan. :angry:

Shirley was quoted...I never saw the fist coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
© 2021 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...