LawrenceA Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 I ran across this list on Bloody Disgusting (which credits BuzzFeed) of the "Most Unwatchable Horror Films Ever Made". By unwatchable they don't mean awful (although more than a few on this list are, in my opinion), but the most gut-wrenching, brain-searing depravities. How many have you seen, and are there others that you can think of that should be on the list? Martyrs (2008) A Serbian Film (2010) Nekromantik (1987) Atroz (2015) Excision (2012) The Human Centipede series (2009, 2011, 2015) Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom (1975) I Spit on Your Grave (1978) Inside (2007) Grotesque (2009) Megan Is Missing (2012) Dead Alive (1992) Guinea Pig series (1980-1990) Naked Blood (1996) Cannibal Holocaust (1980) August Underground series (2001, 2003, 2007) I've seen Martyrs, The Human Centipede, Salo, I Spit on Your Grave, Inside (which I like a lot but it doesn't belong on this list), Dead Alive (neither does this one), Cannibal Holocaust, and August Underground (absolute garbage). I've seen Nekromantik 2 but not the first one. I had never heard of Atroz, Excision, Grotesque, Megan Is Missing, or Naked Blood. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaragon Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 "A Serbian Film" sounds truly horrible as far as the plot. I have never gotten the point "The Human Centipede" But Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsan404 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 I give the "prize" to Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom, definitely. I saw it once and I haven't seen it since. I would add Saw, I never "got" the movie, so I thought it was graphic gore for the sake of graphic gore. A Serbian Film I've seen, and The Human Centipede, hard movies to watch, but not as unpleasant as the other two that I mentioned above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaragon Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 I've always been curious about "Salo" because it's suppose to be art not a torture porn. The first "Saw " movie is not bad but the rest of the series is crap. I would have to add the unpleasant and homophobic "Hostel" which is unpleasant and not scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawrenceA Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 1 hour ago, jaragon said: I've always been curious about "Salo" because it's suppose to be art not a torture porn. Salo is an odd film. Its notorious reputation leads to disappointment for many first-time viewers who have been led to believe that it's some kind of unspeakable grotesquerie. It's much more high-minded and intellectual than the other films on this list. Time has also rendered a lot of the shocking elements less so. I recommend it, but be prepared more for an art film with a leisurely pace than a shock-and-awe thriller or horror spectacle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaragon Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 51 minutes ago, LawrenceA said: Salo is an odd film. Its notorious reputation leads to disappointment for many first-time viewers who have been led to believe that it's some kind of unspeakable grotesquerie. It's much more high-minded and intellectual than the other films on this list. Time has also rendered a lot of the shocking elements less so. I recommend it, but be prepared more for an art film with a leisurely pace than a shock-and-awe thriller or horror spectacle. It's Passolini not "Ten Thousand Maniacs" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaragon Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 The silliest scene in Salo has to be the pagan gay wedding in which the evil torturers in drag marry studly young men- the priest is dressed up like an extra in a Maria Montez picture- seriously were people shocked by this in 1976?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts