Herman Bricks Posted April 10, 2022 Share Posted April 10, 2022 The other night I watched BULL DURHAM (1988) which features one of the most realistic (Kevin Costner) and one of the least realistic (Tim Robbins) attempts by an actor to play professional baseball on-screen. In real-life professional baseball, players and prospects are rated on a scale of 20 to 80 for their abilities to hit, hit with power, run, field and throw. 20= terrible- no potential 30= well below average 40= "fringy" 50= average 60=above average 70= outstanding 80= top of the scale, like in today's MLB, Juan Soto might be an 80 Hit, Aaron Judge an 80 hit with power. American League MVP Shohei Ohtani is 70 or 80 in every category. How would you rate actors/actresses as baseball players in movies? I will add a category- Looking good in a baseball uniform, because sometimes in baseball movies there is not much baseball action, but the actor should at least look like they could play. My ratings from BULL DURHAM? Kevin Costner, hit 60, hit with power 70, run 50, field 70, throw 70, looking good in the uniform= 50. Overall about a 60. Although Costner flashed very good good baseball skills, I did not think he quite looked right in his baseball uniform. He played a catcher, and catchers (especially 15 year veterans like Crash Davis) typically are bigger through the thighs and butt than Costner was. To me, that is the only flaw in his performance, though it is not his fault. Tim Robbins, we only saw him throw (I give him a 20 for this pitching- well below average, not credible) but I give him credit for wearing the uniform well, and if I may add points for his playing Nuke LaLoosh as being very **** and semi-intellectual (could be a plausible portrayal of a fringy athlete), I give him a 45 (not that bad). One of my least favorite actors as a baseball player? Robert DeNiro, BANG THE DRUM SLOWLY (1973) Poor DeNiro looks like he weighs 145 pounds (he does not resemble an athlete in any type of sport). Why does he chew tobacco in his hotel room, but not on the field? And his pitiful Southern drawl? I give him a 20. Terrible, not credible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMagoo Posted April 10, 2022 Share Posted April 10, 2022 I have no problem with any of your takes, Herman. Especially with DeNiro. I would suggest that Costner, in FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME (1999) looked the part of a real major league pitcher. I would give him a 70 in that one. On the other hand, John C. Riley played Costner's catcher in that movie and he was DeNiro-esque. Definitely a 20 there. I would add a couple other baseball turns, as well. Dennis Quaid was credible as a high school teacher who gets a shot at the big leagues in THE ROOKIE (2002). On your scale I'd give Quaid a 60. Above average. As for THE NATURAL (1984) I never felt like Redford came off credibly as a baseball player. I fine movie but Redford was no better than a 40. EIGHT MEN OUT (1988) had no serious looking ballplayers beyond 50 (average at best) D.B. Sweeney as Shoeless Joe Jackson. David Strathairn is fine actor but 30 as a ballplayer. I know Charlie Sheen had some high school baseball experience and he had some credibility in the MAJOR LEAGUE franchise. I'd give him a 50. Some others. John Goodman in THE BABE(1992). Another actor in the DeNiro/Riley baseball category...ugh...another 20. Going back farther. Jimmy Stewart played handicapped player Monty Stratton in THE STRATTON STORY (1949). Mediocre movie with sketchy baseball scenes. Stewart gets a generous 40 (fringy) from me. And William Bendix in 1948's THE BABE RUTH STORY was a 30 (below average). And finally, Gary Cooper's portrayal of Lou Gehrig in PRIDE OF THE YANKEES (1942) was 40...fringy at best. Overall....Costner has the best baseball playing performances. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyWhit Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 That Touch of Mink (1962) These guys looked......oh, yeah......never mind..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cinemaman Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 How about Tab Hunter in Damn Yankees 1958 , Anthony Perkins in Fear Strikes Out 1957 and Kevin Costner/ Ray Liotta in Field of Dreams 1989 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyWhit Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Bernie Mac in Mr. 3000 (2004) hitting -- 65 -- The cast trained with big leaguers to be able to make their efforts look as real as possible. Looks like Bernie is a little stiff. That is likely due to both his actual age and the age of the back-from-retirement character he plays. Raw score on hitting might be more like a 50, but he does a credible job of showing his character's improvement as the film moves along, so I'm adding points for that. hitting with power -- 55 -- Bernie lacks some range of motion here, so followthrough is not very good. Looks like his hips and low back are incapable of enough rotation. running -- 45 -- Bernie pretty much lumbers and seems stiff. Again, this is likely a combination of a 44 year old actor playing a 47 year old character. fielding -- 50 throwing -- 50 looking good in a uniform -- going with a 75 here because Bernie had the stature, carriage, and swagger to really pull this off. And Bernie loved baseball. He was a South Sider, a die-hard White Sox fan. Bernie played baseball in high school. He was a dedicated student of the game. average = 57 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMagoo Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 7 hours ago, cinemaman said: How about Tab Hunter in Damn Yankees 1958 , Anthony Perkins in Fear Strikes Out 1957 and Kevin Costner/ Ray Liotta in Field of Dreams 1989 I really liked FEAR STIKES OUT but never for a second thought of Perkins as a bona fide baseball player. As for Liotta in FOD, he barely had any scenes where he actually played, I think he caught a couple fly balls and that's about it. I will give him a 70 however for his character portrayal. Though Joe Jackson was described as illiterate, Liotta made him seem authentic. I might give D.B Sweeney more credit for a more historically accurate portrayal of Jackson in EIGHT MEN OUT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyWhit Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 On 4/10/2022 at 5:18 PM, MrMagoo said: And finally, Gary Cooper's portrayal of Lou Gehrig in PRIDE OF THE YANKEES (1942) was 40...fringy at best. I agree that Cooper did not possess the skills. That's why I find it sort of funny that he looks about as good in Pride of the Yankees (1942) as he does in the imaginary baseball game he pitches in a hotel room in Meet John Doe (1941). Cooper goes with a sidearm delivery as John Doe, but it looks less like a physiological peculiarity and more like a guy who hadn't seen very much baseball. I wonder if he even dabbled in the game as a kid. Walter Brennan, on the other hand, doesn't look all that bad as the imaginary catcher. He seems to have an ease, even grace, about his movements and understanding the space his body is in. For Meet John Doe, I'd give Coop a generous 38, and Brennan a 42. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cinemaman Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Here is an pair of movies about pitchers , The Pride of St. Louis 1952 with Dan Dailey as Dizzy Dean and The Winning Team 1952 with Ronald Reagan as Grover Cleveland Alexander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMagoo Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 I've seen both but don't remember the Dailey turn enough to pass judgement. My guess is it's average at best. I did see the Ronald Reagan portrayal of Grover Cleveland Alexander and thought it was silly. Reagan was a 30, below average as a HOF baseball pitcher. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman Bricks Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 My comments on some of the analyses above... Dennis Quaid was fairly credible in THE ROOKIE, but did not look like a guy throwing 97MPH! Not even 77 (which, close-up, could appear fast!). So I go with a 50. Robert Redford in THE NATURAL has an very good throwing motion! Authentic-looking enough. His hitting is less impressive, his swing is just not likely to generate the power for the roof-top homeruns in the movie. He looks nice in his uniform. Certain mannerisms were good, like his between pitch routine and the way he ran on and off the field. I'll go with a 55. As for THE STRATTON STORY, Mr. Magoo yer right Jimmy Stewart was fringy, I give him a 40, tops. June Allyson however, caught well, threw the ball harder than Stewart does, and filled out her wardrobe convincingly! She rates a 65! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMagoo Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 This guy, Joe Massingill, played the hitting phenom who was the scouting target of Clint Eastwood's and Justin Timberlake's characters in TROUBLE WITH THE CURVE (2012). Though he looked the part he was not particularly credible as a big time hitter...maybe a 40. I liked TWTC. It was a passably decent baseball themed movie. I actually thought Chris Platt in MONEYBALL (2011) looked halfway decent fielding a couple grounders...a 50. Though, like Liotta in FIELD OF DREAMS, neither actually played much baseball in their respective movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts