madridc Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 *blah blah blah blahdy blah.* *Yes! I am a spammer. fxreyman wins the prize for reporting me first.* Edited by: TCMWebAdmin on Dec 19, 2011 8:49 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesJazGuitar Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 This same thread was already posted elsewhere. Is someone getting paid for the number of hits on that website? This smells of advertising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagladymimi Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 Tom Cruise totally leaves me cold - I could care less whether he is in a movie or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modernah Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 *I also am a spammer. And I have juvenile taste in movies.* Edited by: TCMWebAdmin on Dec 19, 2011 8:52 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrroberts Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 Give it about 25 years, if its still being talked about then it may be considered a classic and suitable for discussion here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyGeetar Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 > {quote:title=mrroberts wrote:}{quote}Give it about 25 years, if its still being talked about then it may be considered a classic Oh, it's happening. I'm positive 25 years from now people will be saying: "wow, do you remember Mission Impossible IV: Ghost Protocol ? That movie totally sucked. " It's funny, a friend of mine and I were talking yesterday about how much someone would have to pay us to watch MI:IV:GP . I settled on $80.00 because I am superbroke, yet somehow $60.00 just wouldn't be enough for my pain and suffering. My friend, who has a good chunk of change in the bank, said she'd see it for $1,000. (she can afford to charge the adequate and fair pain and suffering rate.) Edited by: JonnyGeetar on Dec 17, 2011 3:32 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrroberts Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 You mean your health care insurance provider doesn't provide for potential injuries from seeing a major motion picture blockbuster? These insurance companies look for any excuse to reject a claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SansFin Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 > {quote:title=mrroberts wrote:}{quote}You mean your health care insurance provider doesn't provide for potential injuries from seeing a major motion picture blockbuster? These insurance companies look for any excuse to reject a claim. I have heard there is a new government program which will help those who do not have any health insurance. It will be a toll-free number they can call and hear a recording telling them that their claim is denied. This will ensure they are on an equal footing with people who have HMOs. I have to say I am sorry. I truly have resisted posting this. It is only that I found that so very funny when I heard it and I have found I it is impossible to resist my perverse side. My only avenue of forgiveness is in the fact that it is obvious the original poster is a spammer and this thread should quickly disappear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joefilmone Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 The film has been released in the over charged IMAX ( just a big screen with louder sound)-I wonder how many people are willing to pay this tired franchise with a has been star? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomJH Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Oh, Mr. TCMWebAdmin, he's baaaaaack! But he's got a brand new name. Mr. Spammer Strikes Again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Yep joe, gotta say you're pretty much on target there, alright. Mr. Cruise's best acting was done over 20 years ago in a little movie titled *Born on the Fourth of July.* I never thought "the kid" had any talent and just got by on that bright smile o' his until I saw him in that movie. Yep, it's a shame he's never reached that height in his career since, if ya ask me...OR has seemed to accept a role with that sort of range required in it since then, anyway. (...which begs the question: Why does he keep taking these roles in these over-produced and under-scripted bang-bang action type movies?...of course, I suppose the same question could be asked of Nick Cage too, eh?!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joefilmone Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Cage needs the money because of tax problems- he keeps searching for that elusive franchise but keeps making crap like " Ghostrider" which he is simply to old to play or crazy fx spectacles like " The Sorcerer's Apprentice" which nobody goes to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts