Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Drew Barrymore Gives Birth (Welcome To To World Olive Koperman)


sfpcc1
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

OLIVE?

 

 

NOT "Apple", "Peach" or "Pomegranate-Darjeeling" or whatever dumb-sh** names celebrities conjure up these days?

 

 

I like the three of them already!

 

 

Congratulations to the new parents. The fun is just beginning.

 

 

Sepiatone

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> {quote:title=Hibi wrote:}{quote}I think I heard he was an art dealer or something..........

 

 

 

 

Yes, congrats. to proud parents of Baby Barrymore Kopelman... Mazel Tov Al Holedet Habat

(מזל טוב על הולדת הבת)!!!

Father is "art consultant" and son of former Chanel CEO Arie Kopelman:

http://www.zimbio.com/Will+Kopelman

 

At least they didn't name her Addison, eh Hibi...

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/02/olive-kopelman-celebrity-babies-edible-objects_n_1933938.html

 

Edited by: RMeingast on Oct 3, 2012 6:23 PM

Corrected typo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When parents give their children odd names, they never think to consider what torment the children will go through all during their lifetimes, because of teasing, starting at about age 6, and especially in school.

 

They should have named her Olivia, with a nickname of Olive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of the thousands of times in her life she will be asked "Is that a nickname for Olivia?", when she fills out forms at doctors offices, drivers license bureaus, other government agencies, and other places that require the full legal name.

 

Think of all the errors on important forms when she says "Olive", and the lady writes down "Olivia".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't dislike the name Olive. She might have been named after early silent film star Olive Borden. I always thought her name was nice. But she was a movie star, not a kid in school. The teasing and errors with the name always start in school, and they go on for decades.

 

In the 19th Century, some girls were named with nice sounding names that were already being used for something else, such as India Wilkes, in Gone With the Wind. I think that is a beautiful name, and in fact I think Olive Borden is a beautiful name too.

 

And no, the world will never change, and mean little boys will always make jokes about people's names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> {quote:title=Hibi wrote:}{quote}SHEESH. I was responding to the previous poster who spelled it that way. Makes no difference to me HOW it's spelled! Idiotic name either way!

Take it easy, Hibi... All we need is a flamewar about some baby name... ;)

 

Check out what stats. are for popularity of "Olive" from Social Security Admin. of the USA.

AS you can see, "Olive" ain't too popular over the past 5 years and wasn't even in the top 1,000 names between 1950 and 2006. It's greatest popularity seemed to be between 1887 and 1903...

See stats. below.

 

 

Social Security Online Popular Baby Names tinylogo.gifhttp://www.ssa.gov/

h1. Popularity of a Name

*Popularity of the female name Olive* Year of birth Rank 2011 416 2010 543 2009 588 2008 806 2007 989 2006 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2005 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2004 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2003 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2002 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2001 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 2000 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1999 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1998 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1997 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1996 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1995 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1994 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1993 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1992 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1991 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1990 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1989 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1988 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1987 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1986 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1985 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1984 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1983 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1982 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1981 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1980 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1979 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1978 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1977 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1976 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1975 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1974 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1973 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1972 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1971 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1970 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1969 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1968 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1967 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1966 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1965 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1964 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1963 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1962 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1961 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1960 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1959 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1958 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1957 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1956 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1955 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1954 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1953 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1952 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1951 [a|http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi#fn] 1950 892 1949 902 1948 780 1947 903 1946 728 1945 630 1944 721 1943 529 1942 555 1941 487 1940 529 1939 441 1938 441 1937 409 1936 382 1935 371 1934 348 1933 317 1932 283 1931 274 1930 277 1929 245 1928 223 1927 216 1926 214 1925 203 1924 198 1923 179 1922 169 1921 155 1920 151 1919 150 1918 143 1917 138 1916 132 1915 123 1914 127 1913 129 1912 131 1911 121 1910 125 1909 112 1908 111 1907 118 1906 111 1905 107 1904 106 1903 97 1902 99 1901 98 1900 95 1899 98 1898 93 1897 92 1896 90 1895 91 1894 88 1893 82 1892 83 1891 85 1890 89 1889 88 1888 87 1887 85 ^a^ Not in top 1,000 names for indicated year of birth Note: Rank 1 is the most popular, rank 2 is the next most popular, and so forth. Name data are from Social Security card applications for births that occurred in the United States.

 

Check out your own name here: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's up there with Agnes and other names from that era (turn of the century)...........A name you'd picture your grandmother or an old aunt having (I did have an Aunt Agnes.......)

 

It amazes me how you find this stuff...........

 

Edited by: Hibi on Oct 3, 2012 6:11 PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

© 2023 Turner Classic Movies Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...