AndyM108 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Having just seen Jett Rink's spectacular denouement in Giant the umpteenth time, I started wondering if this is the greatest crash and burn ending of them all in Hollywood history. I then thought of an entirely different but equally wonderful case of just desserts, that of Lonesome Rhodes in A Face in the Crowd, when Patricia Neal turns on the mike while Lonesome is trashing his own audience, in what he thought was a private conversation. To be honest, I find it hard to choose between these two scenes, or between James Dean and Andy Griffith, two great actors in parts that they were born to play. But are there better examples out there that I haven't thought of? Examples of charlatans who come out of nowhere to achieve the pinnacle of one dimensional "success", only to collapse like a house of cards under their own enormous egos. I guess some people might nominate James Cagney's Cody Jarrett "Top of the world!" ending in White Heat, but somehow compared to Jett Rink and Lonesome Rhodes, Cody Jarrett's ending seems almost conventional within the genre of gangster movies. Anyhoo, any other nominations? Link to post Share on other sites
FlyBackTransformer Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Lonesome Rhodes because you at least can understand what he is spouting. :^0 :^0 :^0 Link to post Share on other sites
FlyBackTransformer Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 With Jett Rink it's more like crash and fall. Link to post Share on other sites
casablancalover2 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Charles Foster Kane leaving Susan's room after destroying it in *Citizen Kane*. Link to post Share on other sites
Sepiatone Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 There are fundamental differences in Rhodes and Rink. In their cases, it's the women. Rhodes HAD Marsha. She would have done anything for him and gone anywhere with him, but he allowed his ego to screw that up. Rink WANTED Leslie, but could never have her, so he tried substituting her daughter, Luz, instead. It was all a hollow "victory". Nobody, except those closest to him, knew what Rhodes was all about. Once that was revealed, the public that once adored him instantly reviled him, and he lost everything. EVERYbody knew what Rink was all about. He might have lost some respect among his fellow business associates, but business being business, he would probably remained wealthy and powerful among the oil barons, and would have survived in spite of not being welcome in certain social circles or country clubs. In the MOVIE world, Rink might have been finished. In the REAL world, money ALWAYS trumps morality. Sepiatone Link to post Share on other sites
leobertucelli Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 yES AND I do wish most of those 30's films would do just that---CRASH & BURN all the way so that WE'D NOT HAVE TO SEE THEM ANYMORE! ENOUGH ALREADY. TOO BAD OSBORN REALLY DOESN'T CARE MUCH REGARDING WHAT IS PROGRAMMED - and I don't think I'd ever look at turners and see some films of value. And just because a movie is 80 years old, DOES NOT RENDER IT A CLASSIC!!! Link to post Share on other sites
hoytereden Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I read somewhere that the incoherent speech you hear after Jett's fall wasn't James Dean at all but dubbed in by Dennis Hopper. Seems they needed some post-filming dialogue added and, by that time, Dean had died. They made it mumbled so it wouldn't be too obvious it wasn't Dean. Anyway, that's what I read. More intriguing is that George Stevens wanted and offered the part to Alan Ladd. They had enjoyed a great success together with *Shane* and Stevens thought Ladd would be convincing as both the young and older Jett Rink. Ladd's wife, Sue Carol, who was also his agent, advised him not to take the part since he would be billed behind Elizabeth Taylor and Rock Hudson. Turned out to be a bad decision on many levels-Ladd never had another part comparable to this one and he and Stevens never worked together again. James Dean and George Stevens were constantly at odds with one another and, who knows, if Dean hadn't been in this film, he probably wouldn't have been in the Porche, on that highway, at that time............... Link to post Share on other sites
FlyBackTransformer Posted April 29, 2013 Share Posted April 29, 2013 Yeah, but Dean sounds like he mumbles throughout the whole picture. :^0 Link to post Share on other sites
AndyM108 Posted April 29, 2013 Author Share Posted April 29, 2013 > {quote:title=leobertucelli wrote:}{quote}yES AND I do wish most of those 30's films would do just that---CRASH & BURN all the way so that > WE'D NOT HAVE TO SEE THEM ANYMORE! ENOUGH ALREADY. TOO BAD OSBORN REALLY DOESN'T CARE MUCH REGARDING WHAT IS PROGRAMMED - and I don't think I'd ever look at turners and see some films of value. And just because a movie is 80 years old, DOES NOT RENDER IT A CLASSIC!!! In case you hadn't noticed it, Bright Boy, both Giant and A Face in the Crowd date from the 50's, not the 30's. You can now return to your regularly scheduled FXM schedule. Link to post Share on other sites
jamesjazzguitar Posted April 29, 2013 Share Posted April 29, 2013 Wow what a difference Giant would of been with the low key Ladd instead of the over the top Dean (but I admit I'm NOT a fan of Dean,,, I just see toooo much acting). Link to post Share on other sites
TopBilled Posted April 29, 2013 Share Posted April 29, 2013 >any other nominations? How about Cody Jarrett's crash and burn ending in WHITE HEAT...? Link to post Share on other sites
leobertucelli Posted April 29, 2013 Share Posted April 29, 2013 I agree with HOYT---so interesting and I feel same way ---if LADD did the part then Dean would probably never have died... Link to post Share on other sites
casablancalover2 Posted April 29, 2013 Share Posted April 29, 2013 h4. Mrs Danvers (Judith Anderson) in Rebecca (1940) h5. This time, burn and crash. Link to post Share on other sites
Dargo2 Posted April 30, 2013 Share Posted April 30, 2013 Andy, while I realize your thread title's intent was probably meant more in a figurative(a protagonist's mental breakdown) and not in a literal manner, however being a Gearhead, I just can't resist mentioning the ending of 1971's Vanishing Point, as I believe there may not have LITERALLY been a better "crash and burn ending" to a movie since Barry Newman's Kowalski drove his white 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T 440 Magnum right into the blades of those two bulldozers. Link to post Share on other sites
AndyM108 Posted April 30, 2013 Author Share Posted April 30, 2013 > {quote:title=Dargo2 wrote:}{quote}Andy, while I realize your thread title's intent was probably meant more in a figurative(a protagonist's mental breakdown) and not in a literal manner, however being a Gearhead, I just can't resist mentioning the ending of 1971's *Vanishing Point*, as I believe there may not have LITERALLY been a better "crash and burn ending" to a movie since Barry Newman's Kowalski drove his white 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T 440 Magnum right into the blades of those two bulldozers. You're right, it wasn't meant in a literal sense, although I did mention Cody Jarrett in White Heat as a possible alternate choice my own two favorites. But the beauty of threads like this is that they can go off in many different directions, none necessarily more valid than the others. Link to post Share on other sites
rewrite Posted April 30, 2013 Share Posted April 30, 2013 Bless you Dargo, for reminding me of one of my favorite guilty pleasures. The first time I saw "Vanishing Point," I was in college, in Missoula, Mont. It was on a double bill at the drive-in, with Peter Fonda's "Dirty Mary Crazy Larry". It doesn't get any better than that. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now