classiccinemafan Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 In that interview TCM aired yesterday before Vertigo, Kim Novak was speaking to Robert about that last film she was in. Why was she upset ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sepiatone Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 Maybe she didn't WANT it to be her last? Sepiatone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesJazGuitar Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 In 1991, she played the role of a terminally ill writer with a mysterious past in the thriller Liebestraum opposite Kevin Anderson and Bill Pullman. However, owing to battles with director Mike Figgis over how to play her character, most of her scenes were cut. "I know he thinks I'm a total ****," Novak later told Hollywood Life magazine in 2005. "That role was fabulous, full of depth. When I interpreted it the way I thought was evident in the incredible script, he said, 'We're not making a Kim Novak movie, just say the lines. If you continue to play the role this way, I'm going to cut you out of the movie,' and he pretty much did that." In the interview, Novak admitted she was "unprofessional" not to obey her director. Since then, Novak has usually cited the Liebestraum experience as the reason for her decision to retire from the film industry. In 2004, she told the Associated Press: I got so burned out on that picture that I wanted to leave the business, but then if you wait long enough you think, "Oh, I miss certain things." The making of a movie is wonderful. What's difficult is afterward when you have to go around and try to sell it. The actual filming, when you have a good script?which isn't often?nothing beats it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted September 6, 2013 Share Posted September 6, 2013 ...although she also said that her film career REALLY ended much earlier, after Harry Cohn died. That is not really true. She was in a few decent '60s films, including STRANGERS WHEN WE MEET, BOYS NIGHT OUT, and THE NOTORIOUS LANDLADY, none of which was mentioned by either of them in the interview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Yes, she didnt leave Hollywood till the late 60s/early 70s. Dunno why she implied she left a decade earlier. She made Lylah Clare in 69 I believe.....I think that was her last Hollywood film for awhile.........She did replace Rita Hayworth (ironically) in some British episodic horror film in the 70s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Well, it sounds a bit unprofessional to have cut her out of the film as well. Maybe that's why it bombed............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John2Bad Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 I think a lot of movie stars have rather selective memories. She was still active up until the mid 1960s, but her career wasn't what it had been ten years before, so the late 1950s was more of a rough divid- ing line than a sudden stop to her acting career. I felt bad for Uncle Bob when she started crying. Not much you can do or say in that situation. Best to let it past for the most part. You expect the old timers to laugh a bit or grow serious, but not to start sobbing out loud. Yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 I checked imdb and there's a 3 year gap between Moll Flanders in 65 and Lylah Clare in 68. So maybe she did leave Hollywood around then and returned for a few more films. (werent too many).... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twinkeee Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 < You expect the old timers to laugh a bit, not to start sobbing out loud. Yikes. > If you were 80 years old, you would cry too ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 He could have said, "Now, now....", and offered her a tissue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 He WAS holding her hand. There was an edit after that. I assume they stopped filming for awhile. It switched to a discussion of Vertigo from there......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrroberts Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 This was such a great interview. Kim Novak was so open, so honest. And obviously some of these memories are very painful for her. And a big thumbs up to Robert Osborne. He's very sensitive to her. He asks her a question, if she gets too emotional, he backs off a little, or even changes the subject. No gotcha stuff here and in the long run he gets the most out of the interview. I would believe most anyone would be comfortable sitting with him and conversing (like we see with the Johnny Carson interviews). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Maybe O.J. Simpson would feel comfortable sitting down with RO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo2 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Well, word IS O.J. cried a little bit ALSO after he killed those two people. (...and ironically, it was ONLY because he knew that that would be the end of HIS film career TOO!!!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twinkeee Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 < Maybe O. J. Simpson would feel comfortable sitting down with RO > ...but daddy O. ?!...not so much ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Would RO call him "Juice"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo2 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Maybe, but whatever he'd call him, wouldn't it be kinda cool if Bob would ask him slip on a pair of gloves while he interviewed him? (...just as sort of a "re-creation" of the "greatest performance" that he ever gave, ya see...you know how most actors just LOVE to relive their most triumphant moments, doncha?!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo2 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Btw finance, maybe we ought'a get back to Kim here, as I got me a feelin' not everybody is happy that we've taken this baby in this direction. (...you "bad influence", you!!!) LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John2Bad Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Things did get a little spotty after the mid to late 1960s for Kim. She likely could have soldiered on, but I suppose she decided she had better things to do. Probably a wise decision. I don't know. If I reach 80 I'd just be happy to be alive. And if "now, now..." didn't work, he could have tried "there, there...." From what I recall, she was still thinking of her hard childhood also. Maybe it's not so straange that something so long in the past could produce that reaction. I like Kim and enjoyed the interview, but I was hoping she would have talked a little bit more about the directors and actors she worked with. She didn't go into much detail as I recall. If the gab doesn't fit, you must acquit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Her unwillingness to fight for roles is what took her career downhill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Well, the 60s pretty much stalled or ended many 50s female stars careers. A whole new crop came up with the big cultural shift in the late 60s. Liz continued for awhile, but she was no longer box office. Grace retired, Audrey retired etc. Kim's last few 60s films flopped so she probably saw the writing on the wall.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo2 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Very good point, Hibi. Yep, this was the era when newcomers such as Faye Dunaway(Bette Davis' favorite co-star LOL) would come on the Hollywood scene and seem to replace the stars of the late studio era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 LOL "Not for a million dollars, Faye Dunaway!".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesJazGuitar Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Since you listed Grace Kelly and then Audrey Hepburn as retired I just want to clarity that Kelly retired in the 50s and Hepburn 10 years later in 1967. One could say that Hepburn's best decade was the 60s. (I'm sure you knew that but it might of been confusing to others). But I agree with what you're saying here. In the late 60s the early studio era stars were too old (as defined by Hollywood), and for most second 'wave' stars (ones that got their start in the late 40s early 50s), their career stalled. Of course now you got me interested. I wonder who where the top box offices actresses of the late 60s into the 70s. i.e. when did the new crop pass the second wave at the box office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hibi Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Yes, I know Grace retired much earlier, but I've no doubt she would not have continued on either. It wasnt just age, but the type of films that were made as well from 1968 or so on. The stars werent comfortable with nudity/swearing etc and the newer filmmakers no doubt thought of them as passe. Male stars had an easier time of it, but even then had limited film choices, particularly as the western genre died out. There really were few female box office stars in the 70s outside of Streisand until late in the 70s when Jane Fonda and a few others broke out of the pack. Dunaway started out well, but then floundered. Glenda Jackson had prestige, but her vehicles rarely brought in money...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now