Kid Dabb Posted August 12, 2014 Costello: Look, you gotta pitcher on this team? Abbott: Now wouldn't this be a fine team without a pitcher. Costello: The pitcher's name. Abbott: Tomorrow. Costello: You don't wanna tell me today? Here's the whole routine: Click Here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scsu1975 Posted August 12, 2014 (edited) It looks like the moderator removed a post. Not necessarily. The poster may have removed it. On the old boards, there was some "statute of limitations" for editing posts; 24 hours, I believe. Now, it appears you can go back farther than that to edit a post. OK, I was just able to edit my post from a month and a half ago in this thread. Hey, this is interesting. I wonder if I can go back several years and edit posts. I can predict the results of the presidential election in 2012, who will win the World Series in 2011, etc. and look like Nostradamus. Edited August 12, 2014 by scsu1975 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamesjazzguitar Posted August 12, 2014 Not necessarily. The poster may have removed it. On the old boards, there was some "statute of limitations" for editing posts; 24 hours, I believe. Now, it appears you can go back farther than that to edit a post. OK, I was just able to edit my post from a month and a half ago in this thread. Hey, this is interesting. I wonder if I can go back several years and edit posts. I can predict the results of the presidential election in 2012, who will win the World Series in 2011, etc. and look like Nostradamus. Yes, I know a poster can edit their post and therefore 'remove it' by removing all the text in said post. But this is what the original poster posted with regards to that: "Because the previous post was removed just want to post that I had nothing to do with that,,,,,,". Since the original poster said they had 'nothing to do with that', I assumed 'that' was removing the post. But hey, maybe I just have a misunderstanding. Either way, I was surprised to see this thread rise to the top and was hoping it would go away. Of course now I'm helping to keep it on top! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scsu1975 Posted August 12, 2014 Yes, I know a poster can edit their post and therefore 'remove it' by removing all the text in said post. But this is what the original poster posted with regards to that: "Because the previous post was removed just want to post that I had nothing to do with that,,,,,,". Since the original poster said they had 'nothing to do with that', I assumed 'that' was removing the post. But hey, maybe I just have a misunderstanding. Either way, I was surprised to see this thread rise to the top and was hoping it would go away. Of course now I'm helping to keep it on top! I think you are laboring under a misdemeanor, or something like that. I assume that the party of the first part (the poster whose comment was removed) edited his/her post, and the party of the second part (the respondent) explained that he/she had nothing to do with said removal, either by magically making it disappear or contacting a moderator and saying "please remove the post posted by the party of the first part." Hopefully, someone will keep us posted on all this. We have now broken through the 1000 view mark. Let's go for 10,000. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamesjazzguitar Posted August 12, 2014 (edited) I think you are laboring under a misdemeanor, or something like that. I assume that the party of the first part (the poster whose comment was removed) edited his/her post, and the party of the second part (the respondent) explained that he/she had nothing to do with said removal, either by magically making it disappear or contacting a moderator and saying "please remove the post posted by the party of the first part." Hopefully, someone will keep us posted on all this. We have now broken through the 1000 view mark. Let's go for 10,000. Like I said I could be mistaken. Anyhow, I think Kid had it right with his take on the Abbott and Costello routine. Who is on first? Now that I think about it the Marx brothers routine related to contracts (the party of the first part,,,), works better here. Wasn't that in The Cocoanuts? Edited August 12, 2014 by jamesjazzguitar Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kid Dabb Posted August 12, 2014 Like I said I could be mistaken. Anyhow, I think Kid had it right with his take on the Abbott and Costello routine. Who is on first? Now that I think about it the Marx brothers routine related to contracts (the party of the first part,,,), works better here. Wasn't that in The Cocoanuts? Does the contract have a sanity clause? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scsu1975 Posted August 12, 2014 Like I said I could be mistaken. Anyhow, I think Kid had it right with his take on the Abbott and Costello routine. Who is on first? Now that I think about it the Marx brothers routine related to contracts (the party of the first part,,,), works better here. Wasn't that in The Cocoanuts? A Night at the Opera Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scsu1975 Posted August 12, 2014 Does the contract have a sanity clause? You can't fool me, there ain't no sanity clause. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lavenderblue19 Posted August 13, 2014 James, you TOTALLY misunderstood my post! Rich is CORRECT. Jeez.. primo made a remark and an emoticon in response to my post. Either the moderator or primo REMOVED that post., but my moniker remained in the quote portion of my original post that she used as a quote. I had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE REMOVAL OF HER POST, or REMOVAL OF MY QUOTE. Not hard to understand. THANK YOU RICH Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
darkblue Posted August 13, 2014 James, you TOTALLY misunderstood my post! Rich is CORRECT. Jeez.. primo made a remark and an emoticon in response to my post. Either the moderator or primo REMOVED that post., but my moniker remained in the quote portion of my original post that she used as a quote. I had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE REMOVAL OF HER POST, or REMOVAL OF MY QUOTE. Not hard to understand. THANK YOU RICH primos removed her own post. Who knows why? If a moderator had edited it, he'd have left a message to that effect. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dargo Posted August 13, 2014 primos removed her own post. Who knows why? My guess: She suddenly got the feeling that Warren William wouldn't have approved of whatever she said there. (...yep, it's kind'a like me and how I always first run everything I'm about to post past the spirit of Groucho before I hit this here "enter" button!) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
primosprimos Posted August 22, 2014 My guess: She suddenly got the feeling that Warren William wouldn't have approved of whatever she said there. (...yep, it's kind'a like me and how I always first run everything I'm about to post past the spirit of Groucho before I hit this here "enter" button!) Cute, Dargo. I love the Ignore function only a little less than I love Warren William. And I love Warren William a LOT! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CaveGirl Posted August 6, 2015 I think Warren William should be forced to approve every post made here, from the beyond...even though he did treat Claudette Colbert kind of shabbily in that earlier IOL. Either him or maybe Jack Oakie. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DownGoesFrazier Posted August 7, 2015 Cute, Dargo. I love the Ignore function only a little less than I love Warren William. And I love Warren William a LOT! I have made two big pushes for SOTM, Susan Hayward and Warren William. Apparently the Susan Hayward campaign worked. Now, let's concentrate on Warren William. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamesjazzguitar Posted August 7, 2015 I have made two big pushes for SOTM, Susan Hayward and Warren William. Apparently the Susan Hayward campaign worked. Now, let's concentrate on Warren William. I agree, Warren Williams for SOTM, but right after George Sanders. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DownGoesFrazier Posted August 7, 2015 I agree, Warren Williams for SOTM, but right after George Sanders. Warren William didn't commit suicide, so he gets priority. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FredCDobbs Posted August 8, 2015 Hope that's clear, in other words I'm innocent! Ha! That's what they all say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lavenderblue19 Posted August 8, 2015 Not sure fred why you brought this up again. I was quoted by another poster and my moniker showed in the quote. The poster who quoted me had their post removed either they did that or the mods did that but whoever deleted their post did not remove my monkier from my quote they used and their post which was deleted. What's not to understand ? So weird that you wrote that, not funny and what's your point? unless you were teasing me in a good natured way, I hope so Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DownGoesFrazier Posted August 8, 2015 Ha! That's what they all say. Responding a full year later? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FredCDobbs Posted August 8, 2015 So weird that you wrote that, not funny and what's your point? unless you were teasing me in a good natured way, I hope so Sorry, I was just trying to be funny. Please don't blame me!!! I didn't do it to be rude!!! Aggggg..... I'm INNOCENT!!!!! See? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamesjazzguitar Posted August 8, 2015 Sorry, I was just trying to be funny. Please don't blame me!!! I didn't do it to be rude!!! Aggggg..... I'm INNOCENT!!!!! See? Ha! That's what they all say. (and so the circle of life continues on). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DownGoesFrazier Posted August 9, 2015 Sorry, I was just trying to be funny. Please don't blame me!!! I didn't do it to be rude!!! Aggggg..... I'm INNOCENT!!!!! See? She's saying you were a day late and a dollar short. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
