misswonderly3 Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Thanks for the clarification, Fred. Definitely a resemblance there. Also, both actors often played tough guys, although Dane Clarke's tough guy would have been easily beaten up by Richard Conte's. I like both actors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dabb Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 For me always these two, Warren Stevens left, Barry Sullivan right: And I'm always getting these two mixed up. Whenever I see one of them, it takes me 10 minutes to figure it out. Barry Sullivan Henry Silva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 No, actually dark, I think Fred might have been referring to Dane Clarke, who boasted a magnificent seven......inches! (...that of course would be Dane Clarke the '70s porno star, NOT Dane Clark with the 1940's Warner Brothers contract) You really have no idea how many inches were boasted by the '40s WB star, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 For me always these two, Warren Stevens left, Barry Sullivan right: Oh God, Yes. Find me two actors who looked more alike than these two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 When I was a dopey kid, years before becoming the sophisticate about movies that I am today, I used to confuse . . . Robert Alda with the immortal Cary Grant LOL Looks like you still do, Tom! (...yeah, I caught the joke) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 7 inches is not all that magnificent for a porn star. I think it's pretty much the minimum requirement. Ah! But don't forget there's always "the girth factor" in these sort'a things, dark!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 LOL Looks like you still do, Tom! (...yeah, I caught the joke) Coincidentally, I confuse Robert Alda's son, Alan Alda, with Cary Grant's son, Alan Grant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 You really have no idea how many inches were boasted by the '40s WB star, do you? Well, according to the very first line in Dane's Wikipedia page which states the following... Dane Clark (February 26, 1912 – September 11, 1998) was an American film actor who was known for playing, as he labeled himself, "Joe Average". ...I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess...oh...about 6 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredCDobbs Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Regarding the dimensions someone mentioned, this is simply relative. Any issues can be solved this way: A small guy needs a small girl and a small girl needs a small guy. A large guy needs a large girl, and a large girl needs a large guy. The physical height of the partners is often irrelevant, as in this example: http://nypost.com/2013/06/16/ava-gardners-deathbed-confessions-reveal-stories-of-booze-sex-and-stardom/ Among the shocking revelations: first husband Mickey Rooney was such a womanizer that he cheated on Ava, then considered the most beautiful woman in the world, in their marital bed — while she was in the hospital recovering from an appendectomy. “He went through the ladies like a hot knife through fudge,” she said, adding that her best friend Lana Turner — who’d slept with Rooney first — called him “Andy ****-On.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 Wow! Thanks for that, Fred! (...I always DID wonder how that little squirt was able to land the gorgeous Ava, and now I guess I know!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Wow! Thanks for that, Fred! (...I always DID wonder how that little squirt was able to land the gorgeous Ava, and now I guess I know!) Ava's quote about Sinatra, "Sure, he only weighs 125 pounds, but 100 pounds of that is in his ****." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bundie Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Ben Gazzara and John Cassavetes Robert Alda and Richard Conte Ava Gardner and Yvonne DeCarlo --------------- BLU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredCDobbs Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Lupe Velez and Gary Cooper: Lupe Velez and Johnny Weissmuller: Johnny Weissmuller and Ailene Gates Gary Cooper and wife Rocky Alan Ladd and wife Sue Carroll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dabb Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 delete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredCDobbs Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 delete Kid_Dabb's message deleted by Fred C. Dobbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dabb Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Kid_Dabb's message deleted by Fred C. Dobbs. Dang! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Kimble Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 For me always these two, Warren Stevens left, Barry Sullivan right: Stevens is such a stiff, and Sullivan has such an infinitely better hairpiece, that I never had trouble distinguishing them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Kimble Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Find me two actors who looked more alike than these two. Rod Cameron: Don Megowan: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 Rod Cameron: Don Megowan: Excuse me here Doc, but while yes, Rod Cameron and Don Megowan DID resemble each other quite a bit, I'm PRETTY sure that the picture you posted as Megowan is actually just another picture of Cameron which somebody mislabeled as Megowan when they uploaded it into the Internet. Here is a couple of pictures of Megowan.... ...and notice if you will the difference in the ears between these two actors, and of which Cameron's earlobes being larger and more pronounced than Megowan's somewhat lack of same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 ...and notice if you will the difference in the ears between these two actors, and of which Cameron's earlobes being larger and more pronounced than Megowan's somewhat lack of same. I think that one's a shot from 'The Werewolf' (1956). Excellent - and seemingly lost, considering how rarely seen or even mentioned it is - movie with a terrific werewolf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 I think that one's a shot from 'The Werewolf' (1956). Excellent - and seemingly lost, considering how rarely seen or even mentioned it is - movie with a terrific werewolf. Hmmmm...I don't think I've ever seen that one, dark, however you appear to agree with one Richard Brandt of Colorado Springs' assessment of this film and who's following review appears in the IMDb webpage for it.... User Reviews 3 January 2005 | by Richard Brandt (Colorado Springs) – See all my reviews Ever since Lon Chaney played Lawrence Talbot, werewolves have been depicted as pawns of a cruel destiny, doomed to a bad end, and this Fifties twist on the theme is no exception. That sense of our poor protagonist as a helpless victim of forces beyond his control is what sticks with me from this movie: The burden of guilt falls squarely on the shoulders of the sinister government scientists who devise this atomic-age curse, and their victim's innocence provides no redemption for him. Not sure how much of this was intentional on the part of the writers and director (Fred F. Sears, not far from helming the unfortunate shipwreck of "The Giant Claw"), but I find it superior to the rank and file of Fifties-era drive-in horror films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Kimble Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Excuse me here Doc, but while yes, Rod Cameron and Don Megowan DID resemble each other quite a bit, I'm PRETTY sure that the picture you posted as Megowan is actually just another picture of Cameron which somebody mislabeled as Megowan when they uploaded it into the Internet You're probably right. I actually suspected that, but it was labeled Megowan so I went with it. They still look a heckuva lot alike though. But the resemblance is fluid -- not quite so pronounced when Megowan is doing his "stupid" look (Don seems to have a somewhat wider range of expression than the rather grimfaced Rod). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Hmmmm...I don't think I've ever seen that one, dark, however you appear to agree with one Richard Brandt of Colorado Springs' assessment of this film and who's following review appears in the IMDb webpage for it.... User Reviews 3 January 2005 | by Richard Brandt (Colorado Springs) – See all my reviews Ever since Lon Chaney played Lawrence Talbot, werewolves have been depicted as pawns of a cruel destiny, doomed to a bad end, and this Fifties twist on the theme is no exception. That sense of our poor protagonist as a helpless victim of forces beyond his control is what sticks with me from this movie: The burden of guilt falls squarely on the shoulders of the sinister government scientists who devise this atomic-age curse, and their victim's innocence provides no redemption for him. Not sure how much of this was intentional on the part of the writers and director (Fred F. Sears, not far from helming the unfortunate shipwreck of "The Giant Claw"), but I find it superior to the rank and file of Fifties-era drive-in horror films. It's a good one alright. I'm not surprised you haven't seen it - hasn't been on the tube (that I've been able to find) since 1964. Considering the quality of the transformation scenes - excellent, dark, slobber-dripping human to animal, much scarier than Lon Chaney Jr.'s - how this one has been allowed to disappear is a mystery to me. And it's an intelligent werewolf movie to boot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 It's a good one alright. I'm not surprised you haven't seen it - hasn't been on the tube (that I've been able to find) since 1964. Considering the quality of the transformation scenes (excellent, dark, slobber-dripping human to animal - much scarier than Lon Chaney Jr.'s) - how this one has been allowed to disappear is a mystery to me. And it's an intelligent werewolf movie! Maybe Swengoolie will find this little gem and show it one day...errr...night? (...but then again of course, we'd have to put up with his lame jokes...which I might add are often even lamer than MINE are around here...well, okay...ALMOST as lame as mine, anyway!!!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Kimble Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I admit I'm far from an expert on Don Megowan, but his moment of glory surely must be the classic grade-Z scifier The Creation of the Humanoids. If y'all are extra special nice to me, I might even consider posting my classic essay on COTH. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now