Jump to content
 
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

HITS & MISSES: Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow on TCM


Bogie56
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oooh...Le Plaisir is House of Pleasures? I'm a dummy! 

 

Yes, Spirits of the Dead  is on the US schedule at 4:30 AM EST. However it's not on the Canadian schedule, they have Remorques in that timeslot.

SOTD was scheduled in the original booklet but now seems to have been removed.

 

No problem since of all the anthology ones scheduled, that is the one I would give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the other two covers for the other Ophuls films released on DVD at the same time

 

La Ronde

 

443_box_348x490_original.jpg

 

The Earrings of Madame de...

 

445_BD_box_348x490_original.jpg

It's so funny because I had already seen and had on tape all three of these Max Ophuls' films but when Criterion came out with those new dvd covers back in the day, I had to buy all three of them. The art truly is beautiful and worthy of being a giant poster to be sure!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info!

 

My mind was blown when I saw the promo for this because I DID NOT KNOW THIS MOVIE EXISTED, and I'm like a solid 7.5 on the "Film Buff's Knowledge of Golden Age Obscurities and Esoterica" scale.

 

The only version of RED CHIEF that I have seen is in color, I am assuming that this is not Hawk's version...no?

 

ps- Zanuck had terrible taste, so I'm willing to bet there's nothing wrong with Hawks' contribution.

I have not seen RED CHIEF in colour.

But it stars Fred Allen and Oscar Levant

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen RED CHIEF in colour.

But it stars Fred Allen and Oscar Levant

CF, don't forget it also stars Lee Aker, who played Rusty in "Rin Tin Tin", as the little brat, uh...I mean small dear child who is kidnapped.

 

I wonder what he is doing today?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow, Tuesday, I'll hopefully be taping The Fallen Sparrow.

It's a great film, and focuses on the psychological aspects of Garfield's character having been a POW.  The inability to control a dripping water faucet is mentioned as an example.  In Garfield's case, it is the sound of a man he never sees but who has a heavy limp. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone watch The Flame Within on Maureen O'Sullivan's birthday?  Ann Harding was quite good and I always enjoy Herbert Marshall but this was post pre-code so Dr. Anne had to be oh-so subtle in her desires.  She gave up her career in the end and decided to leave all the decision-making to Dr. Herbert.  This is why I sometimes hate the code.  It could have been a much more interesting movie made about two years earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow I'm recording The Phantom of Paris because phantoms, and The Double Man because it's a Yul Brynner film I haven't seen.

The Double man is new to me too.

 

I will be recording it to make sure that I can watch it when I am not disturbed - and well, there is power washing going on next door this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could say that I enjoyed THE FALLEN SPARROW...but, no.

 

It was not for a lack of effort and substantial charm on the part of a very seductively lit John Garfield, who does everything he can short of waving a pair of semaphore flags and doing a little softshoe to keep the audience focused, but the story is a mess.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

May 18th/19th--All times E.S.T.

 

6:15 p.m. "Eyes Without a Face" (1959)--Horror film finally not scheduled in the late night hours. :)

 

4:00 a.m. "The Last Frontier" (1956)--Anthony Mann western is Arguably the best of the night, buried in the early morning hours--worth recording if you can't stay up for it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could say that I enjoyed THE FALLEN SPARROW...but, no.

 

It was not for a lack of effort and substantial charm on the part of a very seductively lit John Garfield, who does everything he can short of waving a pair of semaphore flags and doing a little softshoe to keep the audience focused, but the story is a mess.

Well,, you can cross that movie off of your list of John Garfield films.

 

That's always good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could say that I enjoyed THE FALLEN SPARROW...but, no.

 

It was not for a lack of effort and substantial charm on the part of a very seductively lit John Garfield, who does everything he can short of waving a pair of semaphore flags and doing a little softshoe to keep the audience focused, but the story is a mess.

 

I did enjoy the movie (last night was the first time I saw it) but the story was confusing e.g. matching the faces to the names as the various characters,  many actors unknown to me,  appear.  (well except for Beavers dad!).     There were also characters that had nothing to do with the story like Garfield's ex-girlfriend.   Okay that was done to not expose the bad guys right off the bat but it just added more confusion and dragged the story down.

 

Garfield was in fine form and O'Hara was so beautiful in black and white,  but I wish she her character was just a more straight forward femme fatale.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did enjoy the movie (last night was the first time I saw it) but the story was confusing e.g. matching the faces to the names as the various characters,  many actors unknown to me,  appear.  (well except for Beavers dad!).     There were also characters that had nothing to do with the story like Garfield's ex-girlfriend.   Okay that was done to not expose the bad guys right off the bat but it just added more confusion and dragged the story down.

 

Garfield was in fine form and O'Hara was so beautiful in black and white,  but I wish she her character was just a more straight forward femme fatale.

Exactly, James. That is why the movie is confusing.

 

We were not supposed to know who the bad guy was.  Because of stereotyped casting of Slezack usually playing a bad guy, we know who it is in retrospect.

 

But movies are not made in retrospect unless it is a remake, sequel or prequel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did enjoy the movie (last night was the first time I saw it) but the story was confusing e.g. matching the faces to the names as the various characters,  many actors unknown to me,  appear.  (well except for Beavers dad!).     There were also characters that had nothing to do with the story like Garfield's ex-girlfriend.   Okay that was done to not expose the bad guys right off the bat but it just added more confusion and dragged the story down.

 

Garfield was in fine form and O'Hara was so beautiful in black and white,  but I wish she her character was just a more straight forward femme fatale.

Exactly, James. That is why the movie is confusing.

 

We were not supposed to know who the bad guy was.  Because of stereotyped casting of Slezack usually playing a bad guy, we know who it is in retrospect.

 

But movies are not made in retrospect unless it is a remake, sequel or prequel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow, Thursday, I'll be taping Once Upon a Time, featuring Cary Grant and a dancing caterpillar. Sounds awful, but it's a Grant film I haven't seen.

Yes, I will be recording too as it is a Cary Grant movie I have not seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow, Thursday, I'll be taping Once Upon a Time, featuring Cary Grant and a dancing caterpillar. Sounds awful, but it's a Grant film I haven't seen.

 

It is not just awful, but incredibly awful.  You have to see it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

© 2022 Turner Classic Movies Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings
×
×
  • Create New...