MrWriteLA Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 No, no, don't take it personally. We're happy to have you contribute, and it's perfectly understandable if you didn't grasp the conventions. It's not like they're posted anywhere, it's just kind of "understood." Please continue to contribute. :-) Link to post Share on other sites
inglis Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 Thank you ! I was a little confused I felt that maybe I was doing something wrong and I appreciate you answering back.Have a good day ! Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 I think it's JackBurley's go... Link to post Share on other sites
JackBurley Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 I think it's Mr.Write's turn. Inglis was my emissary and Write knew "it was the key". Please feel free to post the next query Mr.W. Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 What anatomical feature did Hitchock lack (due to surgery)? Link to post Share on other sites
RobertEmmettHarron Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 Gall bladder? Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 Heh heh. No. Something...um... external. Link to post Share on other sites
morkeleb8 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 bellybutton? Link to post Share on other sites
CineSage_jr Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 Could Hitch have had something in common with...Hitler? Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 > bellybutton? Very good! You're correct! Your turn. Link to post Share on other sites
morkeleb8 Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 ok, what did hitchcock have written on his tombstone? Link to post Share on other sites
CineSage_jr Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 "I'm in on a plot" (though he had joked that it should say "This is what we do to bad little boys." Link to post Share on other sites
morkeleb8 Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 yes! i find his original idea very "hitchcock" your turn! Link to post Share on other sites
CineSage_jr Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 One Hitchcock villain can be identified by a missing body part. Who is he (Herbert Marshall's real-life artificial leg doesn't count), and what didn't he have? Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 That would be Godfrey Tearle's Professor Jordan in "The 39 Steps," and he was missing his little finger. ("Again with the finger!") Link to post Share on other sites
vallo13 Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 Also Otto Kruger (Charles Tobin) in missing the tip of his finger in 1942's Saboteur vallo Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 Kruger's character was very similar to Tearle's and the circumstances of the two scenes are almost identical, but I don't think Kruger was missing a finger joint. You're probably conflating the two. Link to post Share on other sites
CineSage_jr Posted May 27, 2006 Share Posted May 27, 2006 Even if he was, it wasn't a plot-point, as in THE THIRTY-NINE STEPS. Link to post Share on other sites
MrWriteLA Posted May 27, 2006 Share Posted May 27, 2006 Name the Hitchcock movie this line comes from: "Isn't it touching how a perfect murder has kept our friendship alive all these years." Link to post Share on other sites
RockyRoad Posted May 30, 2006 Share Posted May 30, 2006 . Message was edited by: RockyRoad Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now