ElCid Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 in Dixville NH, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 in Dixville NH, anyway. With a name like I woulda thought Clinton and Trump had it in the bag. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 9, 2016 Author Share Posted February 9, 2016 With a name like I woulda thought Clinton and Trump had it in the bag. Actually it is Dixville Notch, vote was 4-0 Sanders over Clinton and Kasich 3-2 over Trump. Only votes cast. They vote at 12:01 AM on Tuesday morning. The battle has begun in SC. Found a Cruz worker on my doorstep at 1:00 PM today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Actually it is Dixville Notch Were you too lazy to type "Notch" in your opening post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 9, 2016 Author Share Posted February 9, 2016 Were you too lazy to type "Notch" in your opening post? Nope, just forgot to do it. Think I also heard it referenced as Dixville on news, but maybe not. Speaking of "lazy," think I'll go watch TCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 The interesting thing will be who comes in second and third behind Trump, as he was supposed to win anyway. Granted, the margin (so far) is probably larger than anyone expected. Clinton did do poorly, but then she was supposed to. With Sanders nomination, I see another McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis scenario. While times have changed, they haven't changed that much. Trump or Cruz may do same for Republicans. Sanders vs. Trump or Cruz. Sort of like Hitler vs. Stalin. There isn't a good choice. This will especially be true if the stock market continues to do poorly. However, that is a reaction to the political and economic siutation in Europe, the Chinese economy and market and the drastic decline in the energy segment in US and the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 The interesting thing will be who comes in second and third behind Trump, as he was supposed to win anyway. Granted, the margin (so far) is probably larger than anyone expected. Clinton did do poorly, but then she was supposed to. With Sanders nomination, I see another McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis scenario. While times have changed, they haven't changed that much. Trump or Cruz may do same for Republicans. Sanders vs. Trump or Cruz. Sort of like Hitler vs. Stalin. There isn't a good choice. This will especially be true if the stock market continues to do poorly. However, that is a reaction to the political and economic siutation in Europe, the Chinese economy and market and the drastic decline in the energy segment in US and the world. You're beginning to babble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr6666 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 #NHPrimary numbers. http://nbcnews.to/1o0xoHs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamradio Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 #NHPrimary numbers. http://nbcnews.to/1o0xoHs At 0% Mike Huckabee should get the hint - DROP OUT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 With Hillary floundering and Sanders an unrealistic nominee, aren't there other qualified Democrats who might jump into the race? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 With Hillary floundering and Sanders an unrealistic nominee, aren't there other qualified Democrats who might jump into the race? Bloomberg? Although not for the Democratic nomination. He is toying with idea of running as an independent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 At 0% Mike Huckabee should get the hint - DROP OUT! Didn't Huckabee drop out after Iowa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Didn't Huckabee drop out after Iowa? Huckabee is tied with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 aBloomberg? Although not for the Democratic nomination. He is toying with idea of running as an independent. Who would be a viable candidate who hasn't shown any interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dargo Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Didn't Huckabee drop out after Iowa? Huckabee is tied with me. Yeah, but from what I saw of the guy during his short run for the White House, it still looked like he's got a good 80-90 pounds on you, DGF! (...saaaay, maybe now that he's out of the race, he could maybe find the time to also get into whole Spinning class thing that you do and loose some of that fat gut he's sportin' lately?!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMadness Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Who would be a viable candidate who hasn't shown any interest? Are things that desperate, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblue Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yeah, but from what I saw of the guy during his short run for the White House, it still looked like he's got a good 80-90 pounds on you, DGF! (...saaaay, maybe now that he's out of the race, he could maybe find the time to also get into whole Spinning class thing that you do and loose some of that fat gut he's sportin' lately?!) I'm very surprised at you, Dargs - lose is spelled with only one "o", even in Canada. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownGoesFrazier Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 (edited) Who would be a viable candidate who hasn't shown any interest? Joe Biden could always re-****. Edited February 10, 2016 by TCMModerator1 Edited for Language Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now